Identifying the impact of audit and feedback on the professional role of the nurse and psychological well-being: An integrative systematic review.
audit
feedback
nursing
professional role
psychological well-being
systematic review
Journal
Nursing & health sciences
ISSN: 1442-2018
Titre abrégé: Nurs Health Sci
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 100891857
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
revised:
29
11
2023
received:
22
03
2023
accepted:
20
01
2024
medline:
5
3
2024
pubmed:
5
3
2024
entrez:
4
3
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This systematic review aimed to critically synthesis evidence to identify the impact that audit and feedback processes have on the professional role of the nurse and psychological well-being. Little is known about the extent to which audit and feedback processes can positively or negatively impact the professional role of the nurse and psychological well-being. An integrative systematic review was conducted. Covidence systematic review software was used to manage the screening process. Data extraction and methodological quality appraisal were conducted in parallel, and a narrative synthesis was conducted. Nurse participation and responsiveness to audit and feedback processes depended on self-perceived motivation, content, and delivery; and nurses viewed it as an opportunity for professional development. However, audit was reported to negatively impact nurses' psychological well-being, with impacts on burnout, stress, and demotivation in the workplace. Targeting framing, delivery, and content of audit and feedback is critical to nurses' satisfaction and successful quality improvement.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13095Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Nursing & Health Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD-R approach. Annual Review of Organisational Psychology and Organisational Behaviour, 1, 389-411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). Evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 9(4), 510-520. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1279
Brook, J., Aitken, L., Webb, R., MacLaren, J., & Salmon, D. (2019). Characteristics of successful interventions to reduce turnover and increase retention of early career nurses: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 91, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.11.003
Brown, B., Gude, W. T., Blakeman, T., van der Veer, S. N., Ivers, N., Francis, J. J., Lorencatto, F., Presseau, J., Peek, N., & Daker-White, G. (2019). Clinical performance feedback intervention theory (CP-FIT): A new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Implementation Science, 14(40), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0883-5
Christina, V., Baldwin, K., Biron, A., Emed, J., & Lepage, K. (2016). Factors influencing the effectiveness of audit and feedback: nurses' perceptions. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(8), 1080-1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12409
Cooke, H. (2006). The surveillance of nursing standards: An organisational case study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(8), 975-984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.003
Dall'Ora, C., Ball, J., Reinius, M., & Griffiths, P. (2020). Burnout in nursing: A theoretical review. Human Resources for Health, 18, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9
De Groot, K., Triemstra, M., Paans, W., & Francke, A. L. (2019). Quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(7), 1379-1393. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13919
de Gutiérrez, M. G. R., & Morais, S. C. R. V. (2017). Systematization of nursing care and the formation of professional identity. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 70(2), 436-441. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0515
Drobny, S. D., Snell, A., Morris, L., Harshbarger, C., Village, P., & Fischer, S. A. (2019). Collaborative rural nurse peer review: A quality improvement project. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 34(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000331
Giesbers, A. (2017). Feedback, the way forward? How feedback on quality measurements affects nurses' well-being and quality improvement [Sl]:[Sn].
Giesbers, S. A., Schouteten, R. L. J., Poutsma, E., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & van Achterberg, T. (2021). Towards a better understanding of the relationship between feedback and nurses' work engagement and burnout: A convergent mixed-methods study on nurses' attributions about the ‘why’ of feedback. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 117, 103889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103889
Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., & Nicolau, B. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of copyright, 1148552, 10 https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12884
International Council of Nurses. (2021). The ICN code of ethics for nurses. https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/2023-06/ICN_Code-of-Ethics_EN_Web.pdf
Iula, A., Ialungo, C., de Waure, C., Raponi, M., Burgazzoli, M., Zega, M., Galletti, C., & Damiani, G. (2020). Quality of care: Ecological study for the evaluation of completeness and accuracy in nursing assessment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093259
Ivers, N., Brown, B., & Grimshaw, J. (2020). Clinical performance feedback and decision support. In M. Wensing, R. Grol, & J. Grimshaw (Eds.), Improving Patient Care (pp. 235-251). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119488620.ch13
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Briend, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012). Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(6), CD000259. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3
Ivers, N. M., Grimshaw, J. M., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., O'Brien, M. A., French, S. D., Young, J., & Odgaard-Jensen, J. (2014). Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, MetaRegression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care. Journal of Internal Medicine, 29, 1534-1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2913-y
Johnson, M., Cowin, L. S., Wilson, I., & Young, H. (2012). Professional identity and nursing: Contemporary theoretical developments and future research challenges. International Nursing Review, 59(4), 562-569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2012.01013.x
Jones, T. L. (2016). Outcome measurement in nursing: Imperatives, ideals, history, and challenges. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 21(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol21No02Man01
Kelly, S. E., Moher, D., & Clifford, T. J. (2016). Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: An exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0258-9
Michl, G., Paterson, C., & Bail, K. (2023). ‘It's all about ticks’: A secondary qualitative analysis of nurse perspectives about documentation audit. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79, 3440-3455.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2016). Registered nurse standards for practice. https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/registered-nurse-standards-for-practice.aspx
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version, 1, b92.
Ramukumba, M. M., & El Amouri, S. (2019). Nurses' perspectives of the nursing documentation audit process. Health SA Gesondheid, 24, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v24i0.1121
Sermeus, W., Aiken, L. H., Ball, J., Bridges, J., Bruyneel, L., Busse, R., De Witte, H., Dello, S., Drennan, J., & Eriksson, L. E. (2022). A workplace organisational intervention to improve hospital nurses' and physicians' mental health: Study protocol for the Magnet4Europe wait list cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 12(7), e059159.
Sinuff, T., Muscedere, J., Rozmovitz, L., Dale, C. M., & Scales, D. C. (2015). A qualitative study of the variable effects of audit and feedback in the ICU. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24(6), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003978
Smyth, S., Whalen, M., Maliszewski, B., & Gardner, H. (2021). Audit and feedback: An evidence-based practice literature review of nursing report cards. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 18, 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12492
Suleiman-Martos, N., Gomez-Urquiza, J. L., Aguayo-Estremera, R., Cañadas-De La Fuente, G. A., De La Fuente-Solana, E. I., & Albendín-García, L. (2020). The effect of mindfulness training on burnout syndrome in nursing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(5), 1124-1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14318
Tuti, T., Nzinga, J., Njoroge, M., Brown, B., Peek, N., English, M., Paton, C., & van der Veer, S. N. (2017). A systematic review of electronic audit and feedback: Intervention effectiveness and use of behaviour change theory. Implementation Science, 12(61), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0590-z
Vabo, G., Slettebø, Å., & Fossum, M. (2017). Participants' perceptions of an intervention implemented in an action research nursing documentation project. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(7-8), 983-993. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13389