Testing Mechanical Properties of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants and Their Degradation.
Breast implant
Breast implant rupture
Breast implant testing
ISO standards
Implant degradation
Journal
Aesthetic plastic surgery
ISSN: 1432-5241
Titre abrégé: Aesthetic Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7701756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
11
07
2023
accepted:
30
01
2024
medline:
5
3
2024
pubmed:
5
3
2024
entrez:
4
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Breast augmentation procedures using silicone implants have become increasingly popular over the past six decades. This article addresses the concerns of patients regarding implant strength by providing clinicians with valuable information in addition to video and pictorial evidence to share, fostering reassurance. The article focuses on the structural integrity and stability of breast implants, which play a critical role in their long-term performance and patient satisfaction. Specifically, it examines the industry standards outlined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), with a particular emphasis on ISO14607-2018, which encompasses a range of mechanical and physio-mechanical tests, including the assessment of silicone gel-fill firmness, evaluation of shell integrity, and examination of the impact of environmental conditions on implant performance. Breast implants are not static devices and are subject to aging and fatigue-based degradation. This emphasizes the need for ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure the long-term safety and satisfaction of patients. By providing a comprehensive examination of breast implant structure and industry standards, this article equips clinicians with the necessary knowledge to address patient concerns and foster confidence in the safety and longevity of breast augmentation procedures using silicone implants.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 38438757
doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03886-6
pii: 10.1007/s00266-024-03886-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Références
Perry D, Frame JD (2020) The history and development of breast implants. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 102(7):478–482. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2020.0003
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0003
pubmed: 31964154
pmcid: 7450417
International Organization for Standardization (2018) ISO14607-2018-04, 3
American Standards of Testing Materials (2022) ASTM F703-18 R22. Standard specification for implantable breast protheses.
McGhee DE, Steele JR (2020) Breast biomechanics: What do We really know? Physiol (Bethesda) 35(2):144–156. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00024.2019 . (PMID: 32027563)
doi: 10.1152/physiol.00024.2019
American Standards of Testing Materials (2011) ASTM 1980-07-2011. Standard guide for accelerated aging of sterile barrier systems for medical devices.
Le-Petross HT, Scoggins ME, Clemens MW (2023) Assessment, complications, and surveillance of breast implants: making sense of 2022 FDA breast implant guidance. J Breast Imag. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbad029
doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbad029
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care (2023) Breast implant associated cancer: health professionals information. https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/resource/guidance/bia-alcl-information-health-professionals#routine Accessed 2 July 2023
Mîra A, Carton AK, Muller S, Payan Y (2018) A biomechanical breast model evaluated with respect to MRI data collected in three different positions. Clin Biomech 1(60):191–199
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.10.020
Serwan E, Matthews D, Davies J, Chau M (2020) Mammographic compression practices of force-and pressure-standardisation protocol: a scoping review. J Med Radiat Sci 67(3):233–242
doi: 10.1002/jmrs.400
pubmed: 32420700
pmcid: 7476195
Dijkman HB, Slaats I, Bult P (2021) Assessment of silicone particle migration among women undergoing removal or revision of silicone breast implants in the Netherlands. JAMA Netw Open 4(9):e2125381
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25381
pubmed: 34542618
pmcid: 8453317
Brody GS, Deapen D, Taylor CR, Pinter-Brown L, House-Lightner SR, Andersen JS, Carlson G, Lechner MG, Epstein AL (2015) Anaplastic large cell lymphoma occurring in women with breast implants: analysis of 173 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(3):695–705. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001033.Erratum.In:PlastReconstrSurg.2015Aug;136(2):426 . (PMID: 25490535)
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001033.Erratum.In:PlastReconstrSurg.2015Aug;136(2):426
pubmed: 25490535
Janzekovic J, Hunt J, Peltz T, Wagels M, Brown T, Hutmacher DW (2022) Biomechanical principles of breast implants and current state of research in soft tissue engineering for cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02559-y . (Epub 2021 Sep 7 PMID: 34494126)
doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02559-y