Interventions to promote health literacy among working-age populations experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage: systematic review.

albatross plots face-to-face health literacy intervention strategies multilingual education socioeconomically disadvantaged systematic review

Journal

Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 03 11 2023
accepted: 05 02 2024
medline: 5 3 2024
pubmed: 5 3 2024
entrez: 5 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Experiencing financial insecurity and being underserved is often associated with low health literacy, i.e., the ability to identify, obtain, interpret and act upon health information, which may result in poor health outcomes. Little is known about effective interventions for promoting health literacy among underserved populations. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize the literature on such interventions and identify characteristics that differentiate more effective interventions. Following PRISMA guidelines we searched the databases SCOPUS, Pubmed, Web of Science core collection and CINAHL. We included primary studies with a quantitative study design and control groups testing interventions to increase health literacy or health knowledge in underserved populations between 18 and 65 years. Where possible, we converted effect sizes into Cohen's d and compared mean differences of intervention and control groups. Albatross plots were created to summarize the results according to different health literacy and health knowledge outcomes. We screened 3,696 titles and abstracts and 206 full texts. In total, 86 articles were analyzed, of which 55 were summarized in seven albatross plots. The majority of the studies ( Although the outcomes addressed in the included studies were heterogeneous, effective intervention approaches were often culturally sensitive and developed tailored educational materials. Interventions aiming to promote health literacy in underserved populations should hence consider applying similar approaches.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Experiencing financial insecurity and being underserved is often associated with low health literacy, i.e., the ability to identify, obtain, interpret and act upon health information, which may result in poor health outcomes. Little is known about effective interventions for promoting health literacy among underserved populations. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize the literature on such interventions and identify characteristics that differentiate more effective interventions.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Following PRISMA guidelines we searched the databases SCOPUS, Pubmed, Web of Science core collection and CINAHL. We included primary studies with a quantitative study design and control groups testing interventions to increase health literacy or health knowledge in underserved populations between 18 and 65 years. Where possible, we converted effect sizes into Cohen's d and compared mean differences of intervention and control groups. Albatross plots were created to summarize the results according to different health literacy and health knowledge outcomes.
Results UNASSIGNED
We screened 3,696 titles and abstracts and 206 full texts. In total, 86 articles were analyzed, of which 55 were summarized in seven albatross plots. The majority of the studies (
Discussion UNASSIGNED
Although the outcomes addressed in the included studies were heterogeneous, effective intervention approaches were often culturally sensitive and developed tailored educational materials. Interventions aiming to promote health literacy in underserved populations should hence consider applying similar approaches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38439762
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1332720
pmc: PMC10909862
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1332720

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Singh, Samkange-Zeeb, Kolschen, Herrmann, Hübner, Barnils, Brand, Zeeb and Schüz.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Himal Singh (H)

Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Florence Samkange-Zeeb (F)

Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.

Jonathan Kolschen (J)

Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Ruben Herrmann (R)

Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Wiebke Hübner (W)

Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.

Núria Pedrós Barnils (NP)

Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Tilman Brand (T)

Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.

Hajo Zeeb (H)

Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Benjamin Schüz (B)

Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH