What kind of a problem is loneliness? Representations of connectedness and participation from a study of telepresence technologies in the UK.

interpretive loneliness policy analysis qualitative social isolation sociotechnical technology telepresence

Journal

Frontiers in digital health
ISSN: 2673-253X
Titre abrégé: Front Digit Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101771889

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 28 09 2023
accepted: 01 02 2024
medline: 5 3 2024
pubmed: 5 3 2024
entrez: 5 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Loneliness is represented in UK policy as a public health problem with consequences in terms of individual suffering, population burden and service use. However, loneliness is historically and culturally produced; manifestations of loneliness and social isolation also require social and cultural analysis. We explored meanings of loneliness and social isolation in the UK 2020-2022 and considered what the solutions of telepresence technologies reveal about the problems they are used to address. Through qualitative methods we traced the introduction and use of two telepresence technologies and representations of these, and other technologies, in policy and UK media. Our dataset comprises interviews, fieldnotes, policy documents, grey literature and newspaper articles. We found loneliness was represented as a problem of individual human connection and of collective participation in social life, with technology understood as having the potential to enhance and inhibit connections and participation. Technologically-mediated connections were frequently perceived as inferior to in-person contact, particularly in light of the enforced social isolation of the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that addressing loneliness requires attending to other, related, health and social problems and introducing technological solutions requires integration into the complex social and organisational dynamics that shape technology adoption. We conclude that loneliness is primarily understood as a painful lack of co-presence, no longer regarded as simply a subjective experience, but as a social and policy problem demanding resolution.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38440196
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1304085
pmc: PMC10910053
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1304085

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Hughes, Moore, Hennessy, Sandset, Jentoft and Haldar.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Gemma Hughes (G)

School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Lucy Moore (L)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Megan Hennessy (M)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Tony Sandset (T)

Centre for Sustainable Healthcare Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Elian E Jentoft (EE)

Centre for the Study of Digitalization of Public Services and Citizenship, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Marit Haldar (M)

Centre for the Study of Digitalization of Public Services and Citizenship, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Classifications MeSH