Reasons for repeat urgent cardiac procedures within the same day.
PCI
cardiac catheterization
chest pain
vascular complication
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Mar 2024
05 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
05
02
2024
accepted:
25
02
2024
medline:
5
3
2024
pubmed:
5
3
2024
entrez:
5
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
With advances in technology and technique, the expectations are that patients undergoing procedures in the cardiac catheterization laboratory will not need to return for a repeat procedure within the same day. Report why subjects undergoing cardiac procedures return urgently to the catheterization laboratory for a repeat procedure during the same day. We retrospectively reviewed patients who were brought back to the cardiac catheterization laboratory within the same day for a repeat procedure. The reasons for index and repeat procedure were identified. Patients who were transferred from an outside center after an initial procedure at other centers were excluded. Between November 2013 and January 2022, 55,942 catheterization procedures were performed at our institution, of which 140 entries were included in our analysis. Common reasons for the index procedure were diagnostic angiography (35.0%), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, 29.2%), and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (15.0%). The most common reason for bringing these patients back to the cardiac catheterization laboratory within the same day was vascular complications (24.2%), followed by repeat PCI (20.7%), need for hemodynamic support (15.0%), heart team discussion and PCI (10%), and pacemaker implantation (10%). Acute limb ischemia was the most commonly identified vascular complication (7.1%), followed by pseudoaneurysm (5%). Our study demonstrates that a very small number of patients underwent repeat procedures within the same day. Special attention should be paid to vascular access and closure and assessment of recurrent chest pain postprocedure, as these are the main reasons for same-day repeat procedures.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
With advances in technology and technique, the expectations are that patients undergoing procedures in the cardiac catheterization laboratory will not need to return for a repeat procedure within the same day.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Report why subjects undergoing cardiac procedures return urgently to the catheterization laboratory for a repeat procedure during the same day.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed patients who were brought back to the cardiac catheterization laboratory within the same day for a repeat procedure. The reasons for index and repeat procedure were identified. Patients who were transferred from an outside center after an initial procedure at other centers were excluded.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Between November 2013 and January 2022, 55,942 catheterization procedures were performed at our institution, of which 140 entries were included in our analysis. Common reasons for the index procedure were diagnostic angiography (35.0%), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, 29.2%), and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (15.0%). The most common reason for bringing these patients back to the cardiac catheterization laboratory within the same day was vascular complications (24.2%), followed by repeat PCI (20.7%), need for hemodynamic support (15.0%), heart team discussion and PCI (10%), and pacemaker implantation (10%). Acute limb ischemia was the most commonly identified vascular complication (7.1%), followed by pseudoaneurysm (5%).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrates that a very small number of patients underwent repeat procedures within the same day. Special attention should be paid to vascular access and closure and assessment of recurrent chest pain postprocedure, as these are the main reasons for same-day repeat procedures.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, et al. American heart association council on epidemiology and prevention statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2020;141:e139-e596.
Al-Hijji MA, Lennon RJ, Gulati R, et al. Safety and risk of major complications with diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Circ Cardiovas Intervent. 2019;12:e007791.
Waldo SW, Gokhale M, O'Donnell CI, et al. Temporal trends in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:879-888.
Applegate R, Sacrinty M, Little W, Gandhi S, Kutcher M, Santos R. Prognostic implications of vascular complications following PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;74:64-73.
Marso SP. Association between use of bleeding avoidance strategies and risk of periprocedural bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2010;303:2156-2164.
Chandrasekar B, Doucet S, Bilodeau L, et al. Complications of cardiac catheterization in the current era: a single-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52:289-295.
Chiang A, Gada H, Kodali SK, et al. Procedural variation in the performance of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A SCAI-based survey study of US interventional cardiologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:721-726.
Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:e21-e129.
Witberg G, Tzalamouras V, Adams H, et al. Routine ultrasound or fluoroscopy use and risk of Vascular/Bleeding complications after transfemoral TAVR. JACC Cardiovas Interv. 2020;13:1460-1468.
Chang CC, Chen YC, Ong ET, et al. Chest pain after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1123-1128.