Systematic review for the development of a core outcome set for monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery.

cataract core outcome set monofocal IOLs patients’ preferences stakeholders

Journal

Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 16 11 2023
accepted: 05 02 2024
medline: 6 3 2024
pubmed: 6 3 2024
entrez: 6 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of the study was to define a core outcome set (COS) to be measured following cataract surgery for the postoperative evaluation of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Compared to current COSs, the present work provides updates considering the advances in the technology due to the development of new generation monofocal IOLs, which are characterized by a safety profile comparable to standard monofocal IOLs but with an extended range of intermediate vision. Healthcare professionals (ophthalmologist surgeons) and patients were involved in the selection of outcomes to be included in the COS, starting from a list of indicators retrieved from a systematic literature search. The search considered observational studies with both a retrospective or prospective design, case studies and classic randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A mixed methodology integrating a Delphi-driven and an expert panel approach was adopted to reach an agreement among clinicians, while patients were involved in the completion of a questionnaire. The final COS included 15 outcomes. Eleven outcomes, all clinical, were considered for inclusion after a joint discussion among ophthalmologists; seven outcomes were linked to visual acuity, while the remaining to contrast sensitivity, refractive errors, aberrations and adverse events. Measurement metrics, method of aggregation and measurement time point of these outcomes were specified. The most important aspects for the patients were (1) quality of life after cataract surgery, (2) the capacity to perform activities requiring good near vision (e.g., reading), (3) spectacle independence, and (4) safety of movements without fear of getting hurt or falling (intermediate vision). In a context with limited healthcare resources, it is important to optimize their use considering also the preferences of end-users, namely patients. The proposed COS, developed involving both ophthalmologists and patients, provides an instrument for the postoperative evaluation of different technologies in the context of monofocal IOLs, which can be used not only in clinical trials but also in clinical practice to increase the body of real-world evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38444419
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1339793
pmc: PMC10912568
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1339793

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Tarricone, Rognoni, Ciarlo, Giabbani, Novello, Balestrieri, Costa, Favuzza, Mencucci, Taroni, Tognetto and Giglio.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Auteurs

Rosanna Tarricone (R)

Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

Carla Rognoni (C)

Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

Anita Ciarlo (A)

Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

Ilaria Giabbani (I)

Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

Leonardo Novello (L)

Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

Marco Balestrieri (M)

Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì, Italy.

Giacomo Costa (G)

Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì, Italy.

Eleonora Favuzza (E)

Eye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Rita Mencucci (R)

Eye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Leonardo Taroni (L)

Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì, Italy.

Daniele Tognetto (D)

University Eye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Rosa Giglio (R)

University Eye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Classifications MeSH