Relationship between long-term visual function and the ratio of foveal avascular zone area in eyes with macular hole and healthy fellow eyes.
Fellow eye
Foveal avascular zone
Macular hole
Optical coherence tomography angiography
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Mar 2024
06 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
29
11
2023
accepted:
27
02
2024
revised:
17
02
2024
medline:
6
3
2024
pubmed:
6
3
2024
entrez:
6
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study is to investigate the relationship between long-term changes in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and visual function of eyes with macular hole (MH) and compare the relationship between the FAZ of MH eyes and fellow eyes. This study included 31 patients with unilateral MH who underwent vitrectomy and their fellow eyes. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and metamorphopsia were measured preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. We evaluated retinal parameters using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the superficial FAZ using OCT angiography. The FAZ ratio was defined as follows: (preoperative FAZ area of the MH eye)/(FAZ area of the fellow eye). The preoperative FAZ area of MH eyes was 0.42 ± 0.08 mm A larger FAZ in the MH eye than that in the fellow eye is associated with poorer long-term visual acuity. The preoperative comparison of the FAZ of the MH eye with that of the fellow eye may be a biomarker for predicting long-term visual acuity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38446202
doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06433-w
pii: 10.1007/s00417-024-06433-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Bringmann A, Unterlauft JD, Barth T, Wiedemann R, Rehak M, Wiedemann P (2022) Müller cells and astrocytes in tractional macular disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res 86:100977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100977
doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100977
pubmed: 34102317
Kelly NE, Wendel RT (1991) Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 109:654–659. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1991.01080050068031
doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080050068031
pubmed: 2025167
Brooks HL (2000) Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmol 107:1939–48; discussion 1948. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00331-6
Madreperla SA, Geiger GL, Funata M, de la Cruz Z, Green WR (1994) Clinicopathologic correlation of a macular hole treated by cortical vitreous peeling and gas tamponade. Ophthalmology 101:682–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31278-4
doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31278-4
pubmed: 8152763
Kawano K, Ito Y, Kondo M et al (2013) Displacement of foveal area toward optic disc after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling. Eye (Lond) 27:871–877. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.99
doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.99
pubmed: 23703632
Pak KY, Park KH, Kim KH et al (2017) Topographic changes of the macula after closure of idiopathic macular hole. Retina 37:667–672. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001251
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001251
pubmed: 27575410
Wakabayashi T, Fujiwara M, Sakaguchi H, Kusaka S, Oshima Y (2010) Foveal microstructure and visual acuity in surgically closed macular holes: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic analysis. Ophthalmology 117:1815–1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.017
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.017
pubmed: 20472291
Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, Hiraoka T, Hirakata A (2012) Correlation between length of foveal cone outer segment tips line defect and visual acuity after macular hole closure. Ophthalmology 119:1438–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.023
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.023
pubmed: 22424577
Hirata A, Nakada H, Mine K, Masumoto M, Sato T, Hayashi K (2019) Relationship between the morphology of the foveal avascular zone and the degree of aniseikonia before and after vitrectomy in patients with unilateral epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257:507–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04245-x
doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04245-x
pubmed: 30637451
Yoshida H, Terashima H, Ueda E et al (2020) Relationship between morphological changes in the foveal avascular zone of the epiretinal membrane and postoperative visual function. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 5:e000636. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000636
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000636
pubmed: 33376808
pmcid: 7747545
Tsuboi K, Fukutomi A, Sasajima H et al (2020) Visual acuity recovery after macular hole closure associated with foveal avascular zone change. Transl Vis Sci Technol 9:20. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.8.20
doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.8.20
pubmed: 32855867
pmcid: 7422767
Provis JM, Dubis AM, Maddess T, Carroll J (2013) Adaptation of the central retina for high acuity vision: cones, the fovea and the avascular zone. Prog Retin Eye Res 35:63–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.01.005
pubmed: 23500068
pmcid: 3658155
Baba T, Kakisu M, Nizawa T, Oshitari T, Yamamoto S (2017) Superficial foveal avascular zone determined by optical coherence tomography angiography before and after macular hole surgery. Retina 37:444–450. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001205
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001205
pubmed: 28225721
Cheng D, Tao JW, Yu XT et al (2022) Characteristics of macular microvasculature before and after idiopathic macular hole surgery. Int J Ophthalmol 15:98–105. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2022.01.15
doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.01.15
pubmed: 35047363
pmcid: 8720337
Kita Y, Inoue M, Kita R et al (2017) Changes in the size of the foveal avascular zone after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for a macular hole. Jpn J Ophthalmol 61:465–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-017-0529-6
doi: 10.1007/s10384-017-0529-6
pubmed: 28785921
Dubis AM, Hansen BR, Cooper RF, Beringer J, Dubra A, Carroll J (2012) Relationship between the foveal avascular zone and foveal pit morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:1628–1636. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8488
doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8488
pubmed: 22323466
pmcid: 3339921
Samara WA, Say EAT, Khoo CTL et al (2015) Correlation of foveal avascular zone size with foveal morphology in normal eyes using optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 35:2188–2195. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000847
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000847
pubmed: 26469536
Tick S, Rossant F, Ghorbel I et al (2011) Foveal shape and structure in a normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:5105–5110. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-7005
doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-7005
pubmed: 21803966
Wagner-Schuman M, Dubis AM, Nordgren RN et al (2011) Race- and sex-related differences in retinal thickness and foveal pit morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:625–634. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5886
doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5886
pubmed: 20861480
pmcid: 3053303
Liu M, Fujiwara A, Morizane Y et al (2020) Interocular symmetry of the foveal avascular zone area in healthy eyes: a swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography study. Jpn J Ophthalmol 64:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-020-00719-2
doi: 10.1007/s10384-020-00719-2
pubmed: 32016665
Kumagai K, Hangai M, Larson E, Ogino N (2013) Foveal thickness in healthy fellow eyes of patients with unilateral macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 156:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.11.029
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.11.029
pubmed: 23540711
Kumagai K, Ogino N, Horie E, Fukami M, Furukawa M (2022) Foveal morphology of normal fellow eyes of patients with unilateral macular hole. Ophthalmol Retina 6:361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.12.022
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2021.12.022
pubmed: 34999016
Murphy DC, Melville HJR, George G et al (2021) The association between foveal floor measurements and macular hole size. Ophthalmol Retina 5:680–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.023
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.023
pubmed: 33035712
Shin JY, Chu YK, Hong YT, Kwon OW, Byeon SH (2015) Determination of macular hole size in relation to individual variabilities of fovea morphology. Eye (Lond) 29:1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.81
doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.81
pubmed: 25998944
Bennett AG, Rudnicka AR, Edgar DF (1994) Improvements on Littmann’s method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:361–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175988
doi: 10.1007/BF00175988
pubmed: 8082844
Zhu Q, Xing X, Wang M et al (2020) Characterization of the three distinct retinal capillary plexuses using optical coherence tomography angiography in myopic eyes. Trans Vis Sci Tech 9:8. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.4.8
doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.4.8
Knaapi L, Aarnisalo E, Vesti E, Leinonen MT (2015) Clinical verification of the formula of Bennett et al (1994) of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography. Acta Ophthalmol 93:248–252 https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12555
Kim YJ, Jo J, Lee JY, Yoon YH, Kim JG (2018) Macular capillary plexuses after macular hole surgery: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Br J Ophthalmol 102:966–970. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311132
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311132
pubmed: 28982954
Sugiura Y, Okamoto F, Okamoto Y, Hiraoka T, Oshika T (2017) Relationship between metamorphopsia and intraretinal cysts within the fluid cuff after surgery for idiopathic macular hole. Retina 37:70–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001136
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001136
pubmed: 27205893
Tsuboi K, Guo Y, Wang J et al (2022) Three-dimensional quantification of intraretinal cystoid spaces associated with full-thickness macular hole. Retina 42:2267–2275. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003618
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003618
pubmed: 36007173
Kumagai K, Hangai M, Larson E, Ogino N (2011) Vitreoretinal interface and foveal deformation in asymptomatic fellow eyes of patients with unilateral macular holes. Ophthalmology 118:1638–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.022
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.022
pubmed: 21459450