Relationship between long-term visual function and the ratio of foveal avascular zone area in eyes with macular hole and healthy fellow eyes.

Fellow eye Foveal avascular zone Macular hole Optical coherence tomography angiography

Journal

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 29 11 2023
accepted: 27 02 2024
revised: 17 02 2024
medline: 6 3 2024
pubmed: 6 3 2024
entrez: 6 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study is to investigate the relationship between long-term changes in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and visual function of eyes with macular hole (MH) and compare the relationship between the FAZ of MH eyes and fellow eyes. This study included 31 patients with unilateral MH who underwent vitrectomy and their fellow eyes. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and metamorphopsia were measured preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. We evaluated retinal parameters using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the superficial FAZ using OCT angiography. The FAZ ratio was defined as follows: (preoperative FAZ area of the MH eye)/(FAZ area of the fellow eye). The preoperative FAZ area of MH eyes was 0.42 ± 0.08 mm A larger FAZ in the MH eye than that in the fellow eye is associated with poorer long-term visual acuity. The preoperative comparison of the FAZ of the MH eye with that of the fellow eye may be a biomarker for predicting long-term visual acuity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38446202
doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06433-w
pii: 10.1007/s00417-024-06433-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Bringmann A, Unterlauft JD, Barth T, Wiedemann R, Rehak M, Wiedemann P (2022) Müller cells and astrocytes in tractional macular disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res 86:100977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100977
doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100977 pubmed: 34102317
Kelly NE, Wendel RT (1991) Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 109:654–659. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1991.01080050068031
doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080050068031 pubmed: 2025167
Brooks HL (2000) Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmol 107:1939–48; discussion 1948. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00331-6
Madreperla SA, Geiger GL, Funata M, de la Cruz Z, Green WR (1994) Clinicopathologic correlation of a macular hole treated by cortical vitreous peeling and gas tamponade. Ophthalmology 101:682–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31278-4
doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31278-4 pubmed: 8152763
Kawano K, Ito Y, Kondo M et al (2013) Displacement of foveal area toward optic disc after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling. Eye (Lond) 27:871–877. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.99
doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.99 pubmed: 23703632
Pak KY, Park KH, Kim KH et al (2017) Topographic changes of the macula after closure of idiopathic macular hole. Retina 37:667–672. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001251
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001251 pubmed: 27575410
Wakabayashi T, Fujiwara M, Sakaguchi H, Kusaka S, Oshima Y (2010) Foveal microstructure and visual acuity in surgically closed macular holes: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic analysis. Ophthalmology 117:1815–1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.017
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.017 pubmed: 20472291
Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, Hiraoka T, Hirakata A (2012) Correlation between length of foveal cone outer segment tips line defect and visual acuity after macular hole closure. Ophthalmology 119:1438–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.023
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.023 pubmed: 22424577
Hirata A, Nakada H, Mine K, Masumoto M, Sato T, Hayashi K (2019) Relationship between the morphology of the foveal avascular zone and the degree of aniseikonia before and after vitrectomy in patients with unilateral epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257:507–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04245-x
doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04245-x pubmed: 30637451
Yoshida H, Terashima H, Ueda E et al (2020) Relationship between morphological changes in the foveal avascular zone of the epiretinal membrane and postoperative visual function. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 5:e000636. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000636
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000636 pubmed: 33376808 pmcid: 7747545
Tsuboi K, Fukutomi A, Sasajima H et al (2020) Visual acuity recovery after macular hole closure associated with foveal avascular zone change. Transl Vis Sci Technol 9:20. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.8.20
doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.8.20 pubmed: 32855867 pmcid: 7422767
Provis JM, Dubis AM, Maddess T, Carroll J (2013) Adaptation of the central retina for high acuity vision: cones, the fovea and the avascular zone. Prog Retin Eye Res 35:63–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.01.005 pubmed: 23500068 pmcid: 3658155
Baba T, Kakisu M, Nizawa T, Oshitari T, Yamamoto S (2017) Superficial foveal avascular zone determined by optical coherence tomography angiography before and after macular hole surgery. Retina 37:444–450. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001205
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001205 pubmed: 28225721
Cheng D, Tao JW, Yu XT et al (2022) Characteristics of macular microvasculature before and after idiopathic macular hole surgery. Int J Ophthalmol 15:98–105. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2022.01.15
doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.01.15 pubmed: 35047363 pmcid: 8720337
Kita Y, Inoue M, Kita R et al (2017) Changes in the size of the foveal avascular zone after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for a macular hole. Jpn J Ophthalmol 61:465–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-017-0529-6
doi: 10.1007/s10384-017-0529-6 pubmed: 28785921
Dubis AM, Hansen BR, Cooper RF, Beringer J, Dubra A, Carroll J (2012) Relationship between the foveal avascular zone and foveal pit morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:1628–1636. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8488
doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8488 pubmed: 22323466 pmcid: 3339921
Samara WA, Say EAT, Khoo CTL et al (2015) Correlation of foveal avascular zone size with foveal morphology in normal eyes using optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 35:2188–2195. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000847
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000847 pubmed: 26469536
Tick S, Rossant F, Ghorbel I et al (2011) Foveal shape and structure in a normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:5105–5110. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-7005
doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-7005 pubmed: 21803966
Wagner-Schuman M, Dubis AM, Nordgren RN et al (2011) Race- and sex-related differences in retinal thickness and foveal pit morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:625–634. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5886
doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5886 pubmed: 20861480 pmcid: 3053303
Liu M, Fujiwara A, Morizane Y et al (2020) Interocular symmetry of the foveal avascular zone area in healthy eyes: a swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography study. Jpn J Ophthalmol 64:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-020-00719-2
doi: 10.1007/s10384-020-00719-2 pubmed: 32016665
Kumagai K, Hangai M, Larson E, Ogino N (2013) Foveal thickness in healthy fellow eyes of patients with unilateral macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 156:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.11.029
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.11.029 pubmed: 23540711
Kumagai K, Ogino N, Horie E, Fukami M, Furukawa M (2022) Foveal morphology of normal fellow eyes of patients with unilateral macular hole. Ophthalmol Retina 6:361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.12.022
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2021.12.022 pubmed: 34999016
Murphy DC, Melville HJR, George G et al (2021) The association between foveal floor measurements and macular hole size. Ophthalmol Retina 5:680–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.023
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.023 pubmed: 33035712
Shin JY, Chu YK, Hong YT, Kwon OW, Byeon SH (2015) Determination of macular hole size in relation to individual variabilities of fovea morphology. Eye (Lond) 29:1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.81
doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.81 pubmed: 25998944
Bennett AG, Rudnicka AR, Edgar DF (1994) Improvements on Littmann’s method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:361–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175988
doi: 10.1007/BF00175988 pubmed: 8082844
Zhu Q, Xing X, Wang M et al (2020) Characterization of the three distinct retinal capillary plexuses using optical coherence tomography angiography in myopic eyes. Trans Vis Sci Tech 9:8. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.4.8
doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.4.8
Knaapi L, Aarnisalo E, Vesti E, Leinonen MT (2015) Clinical verification of the formula of Bennett et al (1994) of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography. Acta Ophthalmol 93:248–252 https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12555
Kim YJ, Jo J, Lee JY, Yoon YH, Kim JG (2018) Macular capillary plexuses after macular hole surgery: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Br J Ophthalmol 102:966–970. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311132
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311132 pubmed: 28982954
Sugiura Y, Okamoto F, Okamoto Y, Hiraoka T, Oshika T (2017) Relationship between metamorphopsia and intraretinal cysts within the fluid cuff after surgery for idiopathic macular hole. Retina 37:70–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001136
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001136 pubmed: 27205893
Tsuboi K, Guo Y, Wang J et al (2022) Three-dimensional quantification of intraretinal cystoid spaces associated with full-thickness macular hole. Retina 42:2267–2275. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003618
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003618 pubmed: 36007173
Kumagai K, Hangai M, Larson E, Ogino N (2011) Vitreoretinal interface and foveal deformation in asymptomatic fellow eyes of patients with unilateral macular holes. Ophthalmology 118:1638–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.022
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.022 pubmed: 21459450

Auteurs

Takumi Ando (T)

Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan. takuan-umauma@med.niigata-u.ac.jp.

Hiroko Terashima (H)

Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.

Hiromitsu Yoshida (H)

Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.

Eriko Ueda (E)

Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.
Ueda Eye Clinic, 603-1 Shimokajiya, Murakami City, Niigata, 959-3107, Japan.

Shun Ochiai (S)

Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.

Takeo Fukuchi (T)

Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.

Classifications MeSH