Radiographic Union Assessment in Surgically Treated Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review.
Journal
JBJS reviews
ISSN: 2329-9185
Titre abrégé: JBJS Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2024
01 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline:
6
3
2024
pubmed:
6
3
2024
entrez:
6
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Distal femur fractures are known to have challenging nonunion rates. Despite various available treatment methods aimed to improve union, optimal interventions are yet to be determined. Importantly, there remains no standard agreement on what defines radiographic union. Although various proposed criteria of defining radiographic union exist in the literature, there is no clear consensus on which criteria provide the most precise measurement. The use of inconsistent measures of fracture healing between studies can be problematic and limits their generalizability. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify how fracture union is defined based on radiographic parameters for surgically treated distal femur fractures in current literature. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched from inception to October 2022. Studies that addressed surgically treated distal femur fractures with reported radiographic union assessment were included. Outcomes extracted included radiographic definition of union; any testing of validity, reliability, or responsiveness; reported union rate; reported time to fracture union; and any functional outcomes correlated with radiographic union. Sixty articles with 3,050 operatively treated distal femur fractures were included. Operative interventions included lateral locked plate (42 studies), intramedullary nail (15 studies), dynamic condylar screw or blade plate (7 studies), dual plate or plate and nail construct (5 studies), distal anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior screws (1 study), and external fixation with a circular frame (1 study). The range of mean follow-up time reported was 4.3 to 44 months. The most common definitions of fracture union included "bridging or callus formation across 3 of 4 cortices" in 26 (43%) studies, "bony bridging of cortices" in 21 (35%) studies, and "complete bridging of cortices" in 9 (15%) studies. Two studies included additional assessment of radiographic union using the Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (RUST) or modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (mRUST) scores. One study included description of validity, and the other study included reliability testing. The reported mean union rate of distal femur fractures was 89% (range 58%-100%). The mean time to fracture union was documented in 49 studies and found to be 18 weeks (range 12-36 weeks) in 2,441 cases. No studies reported correlations between functional outcomes and radiographic parameters. The current literature evaluating surgically treated distal femur fractures lacks consistent definition of radiographic fracture union, and the appropriate time point to make this judgement is unclear. To advance surgical optimization, it is necessary that future research uses validated, reliable, and continuous measures of radiographic bone healing and correlation with functional outcomes. Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Distal femur fractures are known to have challenging nonunion rates. Despite various available treatment methods aimed to improve union, optimal interventions are yet to be determined. Importantly, there remains no standard agreement on what defines radiographic union. Although various proposed criteria of defining radiographic union exist in the literature, there is no clear consensus on which criteria provide the most precise measurement. The use of inconsistent measures of fracture healing between studies can be problematic and limits their generalizability. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify how fracture union is defined based on radiographic parameters for surgically treated distal femur fractures in current literature.
METHODS
METHODS
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched from inception to October 2022. Studies that addressed surgically treated distal femur fractures with reported radiographic union assessment were included. Outcomes extracted included radiographic definition of union; any testing of validity, reliability, or responsiveness; reported union rate; reported time to fracture union; and any functional outcomes correlated with radiographic union.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sixty articles with 3,050 operatively treated distal femur fractures were included. Operative interventions included lateral locked plate (42 studies), intramedullary nail (15 studies), dynamic condylar screw or blade plate (7 studies), dual plate or plate and nail construct (5 studies), distal anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior screws (1 study), and external fixation with a circular frame (1 study). The range of mean follow-up time reported was 4.3 to 44 months. The most common definitions of fracture union included "bridging or callus formation across 3 of 4 cortices" in 26 (43%) studies, "bony bridging of cortices" in 21 (35%) studies, and "complete bridging of cortices" in 9 (15%) studies. Two studies included additional assessment of radiographic union using the Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (RUST) or modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (mRUST) scores. One study included description of validity, and the other study included reliability testing. The reported mean union rate of distal femur fractures was 89% (range 58%-100%). The mean time to fracture union was documented in 49 studies and found to be 18 weeks (range 12-36 weeks) in 2,441 cases. No studies reported correlations between functional outcomes and radiographic parameters.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The current literature evaluating surgically treated distal femur fractures lacks consistent definition of radiographic fracture union, and the appropriate time point to make this judgement is unclear. To advance surgical optimization, it is necessary that future research uses validated, reliable, and continuous measures of radiographic bone healing and correlation with functional outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38446912
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00223
pii: 01874474-202403000-00001
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/B65).
Références
Zura R, Xiong Z, Einhorn T, Watson JT, Ostrum RF, Prayson MJ, Della Rocca GJ, Mehta S, McKinley T, Wang Z, Steen RG. Epidemiology of fracture nonunion in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):e162775.
Schandelmaier P, Partenheimer A, Koenemann B, Grün O, Krettek C. Distal femoral fractures and LISS stabilization. Injury. 2001;32:55-63.
Kanabar P, Kumar V, Owen PJ, Rushton N. Less invasive stabilisation system plating for distal femoral fractures. J Orthopaedic Surg (Hong Kong). 2007;15(3):299-302.
Syed AA, Agarwal M, Giannoudis PV, Matthews SJE, Smith RM. Distal femoral fractures: long-term outcome following stabilisation with the LISS. Injury. 2004;35(6):599-607.
Claireaux HA, Searle HK, Parsons NR, Griffin XL. Interventions for treating fractures of the distal femur in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;10:CD010606.
Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau T III. Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(9):1862-8.
Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P III, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(8):562-6.
Lefaivre KA, Slobogean G, Starr AJ, Guy P, Oʼbrien PJ, Macadam SA. Methodology and interpretation of radiographic outcomes in surgically treated pelvic fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(8):474-81.
Dodd A, Lefaivre KA. Outcomes of talar neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(5):210-5.
Dodd A, Osterhoff G, Guy P, Lefaivre KA. Radiographic measurement of displacement in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of the literature. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(6):285-93.
Hammer RRR, Hammerby S, Lindholm B. Accuracy of radiologic assessment of tibial shaft fracture union in humans. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;199:233-8.
Koso RE, Terhoeve C, Steen RG, Zura R. Healing, nonunion, and re-operation after internal fixation of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2018;42(11):2675-83.
Smith TO, Hedges C, MacNair R, Schankat K, Wimhurst JA. The clinical and radiological outcomes of the LISS plate for distal femoral fractures: a systematic review. Injury. 2009;40(10):1049-63.
Wang MT, An VVG, Sivakumar BS. Non-union in lateral locked plating for distal femoral fractures: a systematic review. Injury. 2019;50(11):1790-4.
Lodde MF, Raschke MJ, Stolberg-Stolberg J, Everding J, Rosslenbroich S, Katthagen JC. Union rates and functional outcome of double plating of the femur: systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142(6):1009-30.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
Abdelmonem A, Saber A, El Sagheir M, El-Malky A. Evaluation of the results of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate in the treatment of distal femur fractures. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23617.
Adams JDJ, Tanner SL, Jeray KJ. Far cortical locking screws in distal femur fractures. Orthopedics. 2015;38(3):e153-6.
Ali I, Shahab UD. Surgical outcome of supracondylar and intercondylar fractures femur in adults treated with dynamic condylar screw. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2011;25:49-55.
Ali SD, Shah SKA, Aliuddin AM, Javed I, Azam KS, Naqvi SZG. Functional outcome of distal femur pre-contour locking plate. J Liaquat Univ Med Health Sci. 2021;20:193-7.
Bottlang M, Fitzpatrick DC, Sheerin D, Kubiak E, Gellman R, Vande Zandschulp C, Doornink J, Earley K, Madey SM. Dynamic fixation of distal femur fractures using far cortical locking screws: a prospective observational study. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(4):181-8.
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Are locking constructs in distal femoral fractures always best? A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the less invasive stabilization system with the minimally invasive dynamic condylar screw system. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(1):e1-6.
Chandra Vemulapalli K, Pechero GR, Warner SJ, Achor TS, Gary JL, Munz JW, Choo AM, Prasarn ML, Chip Routt ML Jr. Is retrograde nailing superior to lateral locked plating for complete articular distal femur fractures? Injury. 2022;53(2):640-4.
Christodoulou A, Terzidis I, Ploumis A, Metsovitis S, Koukoulidis A, Toptsis C. Supracondylar femoral fractures in elderly patients treated with the dynamic condylar screw and the retrograde intramedullary nail: a comparative study of the two methods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125(2):73-9.
Chung JY, Cho JH, Kweon HJ, Song HK. The use of interfragmentary positional screw in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for simple distal femur fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective, single-centre pilot study. Injury. 2016;47(12):2795-9.
D'sa P, Karuppiah SV. Extra articular distal femoral fractures in the elderly treated with retrograde nailing using a spiral-locking blade system. Indian J Orthop. 2019;53(2):232-6.
Dominguez I, Rodriguez EM, De Pedro Moro JA, Cebrian Parra JL, López-Durán Stern L. Antegrade nailing for fractures of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;350(350):74-9.
Doshi HK, Wenxian P, Burgula MV, Murphy DP. Clinical outcomes of distal femoral fractures in the geriatric population using locking plates with a minimally invasive approach. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2013;4(1):16-20.
Dunlop DG, Brenkel IJ. The supracondylar intramedullary nail in elderly patients with distal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999;30(7):475-84.
Erdem Y, Neyisci C, Koca K, Ersen O, Bek D. Is staged management with immediate conversion of external fixation to retrograde intramedullary nailing for combat-related Gustilo Type III supracondylar femur fractures safe and reliable method? Injury. 2019;50(3):764-9.
Erhardt JB, Vincenti M, Pressmar J, Kuelling FA, Spross C, Gebhard F, Roederer G. Mid term results of distal femoral fractures treated with a polyaxial locking plate: a multi-center study. Open Orthop J. 2014;8:34-40.
Galal S. Dynamic locked plating for fixation of distal femur fractures using near- cortical over-drilling: preliminary results of a prospective observational study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017;8(3):215-9.
Gavaskar AS, Tummala NC, Krishnamurthy M. Operative management of Hoffa fractures: a prospective review of 18 patients. Injury. 2011;42(12):1495-8.
Gellman RE, Paiement GD, Green HD, Coughlin RR. Treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures with a retrograde intramedullary nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;332(332):90-7.
Gill S, Mittal A, Raj M, Singh P, Singh J, Kumar S. Extra articular supracondylar femur fractures managed with locked distal femoral plate or supracondylar nailing: a comparative outcome study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(5):RC19-23.
Iannacone WM, Bennett FS, DeLong WGJ, Born CT, Dalsey RM. Initial experience with the treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures using the supracondylar intramedullary nail: a preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(4):322-7.
Imam MA, Torieh A, Matthana A. Double plating of intra-articular multifragmentary C3-type distal femoral fractures through the anterior approach. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(1):121-30.
Iqbal T, Mughal NM, Shahwani MB, Dar UF, Imtiaz U, Dar UF. Outcome of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal femoral fractures. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2016;10:492-4.
Isaac J, Krishna V, Sowmiya K. Surgical outcome of distal femoral fractures treated with locking compression plate: a prospective study. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2019;8(25):1969-73.
Jha D, Chatterjee A, Pujari P, Mahapatra S. Comparative study regarding functional and radiological outcomes of different modes of fixation for distal femur fracture. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2020;9(8):502-7.
Kao JT, Giangarra CE, Singer G, Martin S. A comparison of outpatient and inpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(2):151-6.
Khursheed O, Wani M, Rashid S, Lone AH, Manaan Q, Sultan A, Bhat RA, Mir BA, Halwai MA, Akhter N. Results of treatment of distal extra: articular femur fractures with locking plates using minimally invasive approach—experience with 25 consecutive geriatric patients. Musculoskelet Surg. 2015;99(2):139-47.
Kim JW, Oh CW, Kyung HS, Min WK, Yoon SH. Factors affecting the results of distal femoral fractures treated by retrograde intramedullary nailing. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;23(11):1311-5.
Kim JW, Oh CW, Oh JK, Park IH, Kyung HS, Park KH, Yoon SD, Kim SM. Malalignment after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal femoral fractures. Injury. 2017;48(3):751-7.
Kim SM, Yeom JW, Song HK, Hwang KT, Hwang JH, Yoo JH. Lateral locked plating for distal femur fractures by low-energy trauma: what makes a difference in healing? Int Orthop. 2018;42(12):2907-14.
Kiran Kumar GN, Sharma G, Farooque K, Sharma V, Ratan R, Yadav S, Lakhotia D. Locking compression plate in distal femoral intra-articular fractures: our experience. Int Sch Res Not. 2014;2014:372916.
Kiyono M, Noda T, Nagano H, Maehara T, Yamakawa Y, Mochizuki Y, Uchino T, Yokoo S, Demiya K, Saiga K, Shimamura Y, Ozaki T. Clinical outcomes of treatment with locking compression plates for distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):384.
Kulkarni SG, Varshneya A, Kulkarni GS, Kulkarni MG, Kulkarni VS, Kulkarni RM. Antegrade interlocking nailing for distal femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012;20(1):48-54.
Kumar MD, Singh R, Khiyani R, Kaur K, Svareen. Evaluation of results of open distal femur fractures with primary fixation and antibiotic impregnated collagen. Chin J Traumatol. 2019;22(6):328-32.
Kumar R, Mohapatra SS, Joshi N, Goyal SK, Kumar K, Gora R. Primary ilizarov external fixation in open grade III type C distal femur fractures: our experience. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(5):928-33.
Lemsanni M, Najeb Y. Outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) plate system: a single centre experience spanning 15 years. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38:363.
Liu JF, Zhou ZF, Hou XD, Chen YX, Zheng LP. Hybrid locked medial plating in dual plate fixation optimizes the healing of comminuted distal femur fractures: a retrospective cohort study. Injury. 2021;52(6):1614-20.
Liu J, Hein D, Huffman C, Rao BM, Cooper J, Ebraheim NA. Surgical outcomes of non-periprosthetic distal femur fragility fractures treated with a locking plate. Ann Jt. 2022;7:32.
Metwaly RG, Zakaria ZM. Single-incision double-plating approach in the management of isolated, closed osteoporotic distal femoral fractures. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2018;9:2151459318799856.
Nam DJ, Kim MS, Kim TH, Kim MW, Kweon SH. Fractures of the distal femur in elderly patients: retrospective analysis of a case series treated with single or double plate. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):55.
Nayak RM, Koichade MR, Umre AN, Ingle MV. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a locking compression plate for distal femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011;19(2):185-90.
Ocalan E, Ustun CC, Aktuglu K. Locking plate fixation versus antegrade intramedullary nailing for the treatment of extra-articular distal femoral fractures. Injury. 2019;50(suppl 3):55-62.
Padha K, Singh S, Ghani A, Dang H. Distal femur fractures and its treatment with distal femur locking plate. JK Sci. 2016;18:76-80.
Patterson BM, Breslin MA, Wadenpfuhl LK, Vallier HA. New versus old: 95 degree angled blade plate versus distal femoral locking plate. A randomized clinical trial. Injury. 2021;52(6):1563-8.
Sahu RL. Functional outcome following internal fixation of intraarticular fractures of the distal femur. Acta Orthop Belg. 2017;83(2):215-22.
Schutz M, Muller M, Regazzoni P, Höntzsch D, Krettek C, Van der Werken C, Haas N. Use of the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) in patients with distal femoral (AO33) fractures: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125(2):102-8.
Seifert J, Stengel D, Matthes G, Hinz P, Ekkernkamp A, Ostermann PAW. Retrograde fixation of distal femoral fractures: results using a new nail system. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(7):488-95.
Shah SGM, Sahito B, Kumar D, Tariq SM, Parkh N, Ali M. Functional outcome of comminuted intra- articular and extraarticular distal femur fracture treated with distal femur locking plate. Rawal Med J. 2018;43:694-7.
Shanmugasundaram K, Manoharan M. Is the dynamic condylar screw system effective in fractures of distal femur? Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2015;6:1247-54.
Siddiqui YS, Mohd J, Abbas M, Gupta K, Khan MJ, Istiyak M. Technical difficulties and mechanical failure of distal femoral locking compression plate (DFLCP) in management of unstable distal femoral fractures. Int J Burns Trauma. 2021;11(1):9-19.
Strømsøe K, Alho A, Ekeland A. The Grosse-Kempf nail for distal femoral fractures. 2-year follow-up of 25 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;61:512-6.
Subash Y, Damodharan, Vishnu. Evaluation of functional outcome following ORIF with distal femoral locking plate in intraarticular fractures of the distal femur. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2021;12(1):228-33.
Wang R, Zhang H, Cui H, Fan Z, Xu K, Liu P, Ji F, Tang H. Clinical effects and risk factors of far cortical locking system in the treatment of lower limb fractures. Injury. 2019;50(2):432-7.
Wang SH, Wu CC, Li WT, Shen HC, Lin LC, Pan RY. Outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction internal fixation with combined locking plate and interfragmentary screws. Int J Surg. 2019;65:107-12.
Weng CJ, Wu CC, Feng KF, Tseng IC, Lee PC, Huang YC. High incidence of varus deformity in association with condylar buttress plates used to treat supraintercondylar fracture of the femur. Formos J Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;3(2):50-5.
Weng CJ, Wu CC, Feng KF, Tseng IC, Lee PC, Huang YC. Comparison of supraintercondylar and supracondylar femur fractures treated with condylar buttress plates. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):413.
Wong MK, Leung F, Chow SP. Treatment of distal femoral fractures in the elderly using a less-invasive plating technique. Int Orthop. 2005;29(2):117-20.
Wu CC, Shih CH. Treatment of femoral supracondylar unstable comminuted fractures. Comparisons between plating and Grosse-Kempf interlocking nailing techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1992;111(4):232-6.
Zhang J, Wei Y, Yin W, Shen Y, Cao S. Biomechanical and clinical comparison of single lateral plate and double plating of comminuted supracondylar femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2018;84(2):141-8.
Zhang R, Yang Z, Chen K, Guo X, Huang W. Clinical effect of three-dimensional printing assisted less invasive stabilization system (LISS) to treat femoral intercondylar fracture. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2018;11:10809-14.
Kooistra BW, Dijkman BG, Busse JW, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M. The radiographic union scale in tibial fractures: reliability and validity. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(suppl 1):S81-6.
Whelan DB, Bhandari M, Stephen D, Kreder H, McKee MD, Zdero R, Schemitsch EH. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma. 2010;68(3):629-32.
Litrenta J, Tornetta P III, Vallier H, Firoozabadi R, Leighton R, Egol K, Kruppa C, Jones CB, Collinge C, Bhandari M, Schemitsch E, Sanders D, Mullis B. Determination of radiographic healing: an assessment of consistency using rust and modified rust in metadiaphyseal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(12):569-73.
Lujan TJ, Madey SM, Fitzpatrick DC, Byrd GD, Sanderson JM, Bottlang M. A computational technique to measure fracture callus in radiographs. J Biomech. 2010;43(4):792-5.
Kooistra BW, Sprague S, Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH. Outcomes assessment in fracture healing trials: a primer. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(suppl 1):S71-5.