Response rate and molecular correlates to encorafenib and binimetinib in BRAF-V600E mutant high-grade glioma.


Journal

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Mar 2024
Historique:
accepted: 04 03 2024
received: 05 12 2023
revised: 25 01 2024
medline: 6 3 2024
pubmed: 6 3 2024
entrez: 6 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

While fewer than 5% of high-grade gliomas (HGG) are BRAF-V600E mutated, these tumors are notable as BRAF-targeted therapy shows efficacy for some populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate response to the combination of encorafenib with binimetinib in adults with recurrent BRAF-V600 mutated HGG. In this phase 2, open-label, Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC) trial (NCT03973918), encorafenib and binimetinib were administered at their FDA-approved doses continuously in 28-day cycles. Eligible patients were required to have high-grade glioma or glioblastoma with a BRAF-V600E alteration that was recurrent following at least one line of therapy including radiation. Five patients enrolled between January 2020 and administrative termination in November 2021 (due to closure of the ABTC). Enrolled patients received treatment for 2-40 months; currently one patient remains on treatment. Centrally determined radiographic response rate was 60%, with one complete response and two partial responses. Methylation profiling revealed all tumors cluster most closely with anaplastic PXA. Transcriptional profile for MAPK-response signature was similar across all tumors at baseline and did not correlate with response in this small population. Circulating tumor DNA measured in plasma samples prior to treatment, during response, and upon progression showed feasibility of detection for the BRAF-V600E alteration. No new safety signal was detected. Encorafenib and binimetinib exhibit positive tumor responses in patients with recurrent BRAF-V600E mutant HGG in this small series, warranting therapeutic consideration. Although toxicity remains a concern for BRAF-targeted therapies, no new safety signal was observed in these patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38446982
pii: 735080
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-3241
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA230691
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Karisa C Schreck (KC)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Roy E Strowd (RE)

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.

Louis B Nabors (LB)

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Benjamin M Ellingson (BM)

David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Michael Chang (M)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States.

Sze K Tan (SK)

Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Zied Abdullaev (Z)

National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Rust Turakulov (R)

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.

Kenneth Aldape (K)

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.

Neeraja Danda (N)

Montefiore Medical Center, United States.

Serena Desideri (S)

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Joy Fisher (J)

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Michaella Iacoboni (M)

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Trisha Surakus (T)

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Michelle A Rudek (MA)

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Chetan Bettegowda (C)

Ludwig Cancer Research, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Stuart A Grossman (SA)

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Xiaobu Ye (X)

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Classifications MeSH