In vivo and in vitro effects of cord blood hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) expansion using valproic acid and/or nicotinamide.

CD34 expansion Cord blood HSPC transplantation Nicotinamide Valproic acid

Journal

Current research in translational medicine
ISSN: 2452-3186
Titre abrégé: Curr Res Transl Med
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101681234

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 16 02 2024
accepted: 29 02 2024
medline: 7 3 2024
pubmed: 7 3 2024
entrez: 6 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

High self-renewal capacity and most permissive nature of umbilical cord blood (CB) results with successful transplant outcomes but low hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) counts limits wider use. In order to overcome this problem ex vivo expansion with small molecules such as Valproic acid (VPA) or Nicotinamide (NAM) have been shown to be effective. To the best of our knowledge, the combinatory effects of VPA and NAM on HSPC expansion has not been studied earlier. The aim of this study was to analyze ex vivo and in vivo efficacy of VPA and NAM either alone or in combination in terms of expansion and engraftment. A total of 44 CB units were included in this study. To determine the ex vivo and in vivo efficacy, human CB CD34+ cells were expanded with VPA and/or NAM and colony forming unit (CFU) assay was performed on expanded HSPC. Xenotransplantation was performed simultaneously by intravenous injection of expanded HSPC to NOD-SCID gamma (NSG) mice (n = 22). Significance of the difference between the expansion groups or xenotransplantation models was analyzed using t-test, Mann-Whitney, ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate considering the normality of distributions and the number of groups analyzed. In vitro CD34+ HSPC expansion fold relative to cytokines-only was significantly higher with VPA compared to NAM [2.23 (1.07-5.59) vs 1.48 (1.00-4.40); p < 0.05]. Synergistic effect of VPA+NAM has achieved a maximum relative expansion fold at 21 days (D21) of incubation [2.95 (1.00-11.94)]. There was no significant difference between VPA and VPA+NAM D21 (p = 0.44). Fold number of colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) colonies relative to the cytokine-only group was in favor of NAM compared to VPA [1.87 (1.00-3.59) vs 1.00 (1.00-1.81); p < 0.01]. VPA+NAM D21 [1.62 (1.00-2.77)] was also superior against VPA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between NAM and VPA+NAM D21. Following human CB34+ CB transplantation (CBT) in the mouse model, fastest in vivo leukocyte recovery was observed with VPA+NAM expanded cells (6 ± 2 days) and the highest levels of human CD45 chimerism was detectable with VPA-expanded CBT (VPA: 5.42 % at day 28; NAM: 2.45 % at day 31; VPA+NAM 1.8 % at day 31). Our study results suggest using VPA alone, rather than in combination with NAM or NAM alone, to achieve better and faster expansion and engraftment of CB HSPC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
High self-renewal capacity and most permissive nature of umbilical cord blood (CB) results with successful transplant outcomes but low hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) counts limits wider use. In order to overcome this problem ex vivo expansion with small molecules such as Valproic acid (VPA) or Nicotinamide (NAM) have been shown to be effective. To the best of our knowledge, the combinatory effects of VPA and NAM on HSPC expansion has not been studied earlier. The aim of this study was to analyze ex vivo and in vivo efficacy of VPA and NAM either alone or in combination in terms of expansion and engraftment.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 44 CB units were included in this study. To determine the ex vivo and in vivo efficacy, human CB CD34+ cells were expanded with VPA and/or NAM and colony forming unit (CFU) assay was performed on expanded HSPC. Xenotransplantation was performed simultaneously by intravenous injection of expanded HSPC to NOD-SCID gamma (NSG) mice (n = 22). Significance of the difference between the expansion groups or xenotransplantation models was analyzed using t-test, Mann-Whitney, ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate considering the normality of distributions and the number of groups analyzed.
RESULTS RESULTS
In vitro CD34+ HSPC expansion fold relative to cytokines-only was significantly higher with VPA compared to NAM [2.23 (1.07-5.59) vs 1.48 (1.00-4.40); p < 0.05]. Synergistic effect of VPA+NAM has achieved a maximum relative expansion fold at 21 days (D21) of incubation [2.95 (1.00-11.94)]. There was no significant difference between VPA and VPA+NAM D21 (p = 0.44). Fold number of colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) colonies relative to the cytokine-only group was in favor of NAM compared to VPA [1.87 (1.00-3.59) vs 1.00 (1.00-1.81); p < 0.01]. VPA+NAM D21 [1.62 (1.00-2.77)] was also superior against VPA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between NAM and VPA+NAM D21. Following human CB34+ CB transplantation (CBT) in the mouse model, fastest in vivo leukocyte recovery was observed with VPA+NAM expanded cells (6 ± 2 days) and the highest levels of human CD45 chimerism was detectable with VPA-expanded CBT (VPA: 5.42 % at day 28; NAM: 2.45 % at day 31; VPA+NAM 1.8 % at day 31).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Our study results suggest using VPA alone, rather than in combination with NAM or NAM alone, to achieve better and faster expansion and engraftment of CB HSPC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38447268
pii: S2452-3186(24)00007-2
doi: 10.1016/j.retram.2024.103444
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103444

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Emine Begum Gencer (EB)

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Cord Blood Bank, Ankara, Turkey.

Hasan Yalim Akin (HY)

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Cord Blood Bank, Ankara, Turkey; Middle East Technical University, Department of Biochemistry, Ankara, Turkey.

Selami Kocak Toprak (SK)

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Cord Blood Bank, Ankara, Turkey; Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Department of Hematology, Ankara, Turkey.

Eylul Turasan (E)

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Cord Blood Bank, Ankara, Turkey.

Mahsa Yousefzadeh (M)

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Cord Blood Bank, Ankara, Turkey; Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Ankara, Turkey.

Pinar Yurdakul-Mesutoglu (P)

Istinye University Faculty of Medicine Department of Medical Microbiology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Murat Cagan (M)

Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.

Mehmet Murat Seval (MM)

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.

Doruk Cevdi Katlan (DC)

Istanbul Training and Research Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Klara Dalva (K)

Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Ankara, Turkey.

Mehmet Sinan Beksac (MS)

Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey; Istinye University, Ankara Liv Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.

Meral Beksac (M)

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Department of Hematology, Ankara, Turkey; Istinye University, Ankara Liv Hospital, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: beksac@medicine.ankara.edu.tr.

Classifications MeSH