Management after local excision of small rectal cancers. Indications for completion total mesorectal excision and possible alternatives.
Local excision
Radio-chemotherapy
Rectal cancer
Salvage proctectomy
Journal
Journal of visceral surgery
ISSN: 1878-7886
Titre abrégé: J Visc Surg
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101532664
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Mar 2024
05 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline:
7
3
2024
pubmed:
7
3
2024
entrez:
6
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The treatment of superficial rectal cancers (local excision, or proctectomy with total mesorectal excision (TME) remains controversial. Endoscopy and endorectal ultrasonography are essential for the precise initial definition of these small cancers. During endoscopy, the depth of the lesion can be estimated using virtual chromoendoscopy with magnification, thereby aiding the assessment of the possibilities of local excision. Current international recommendations indicate completion proctectomy after wide local excision for cases where the pathologic examination reveals poorly-differentiated lesions, lymphovascular invasion, grade 2 or 3 tumor budding, and incomplete resection. But debate persists regarding whether the depth of submucosal invasion can accurately predict the risk of lymph node spread. Recent data from the literature suggest that the depth of submucosal invasion should no longer, by itself, be an indication for additional oncological surgery. Adjuvant radio-chemotherapy could be an alternative to completion proctectomy in patients with pT1 rectal cancer and unfavorable histopathological criteria. A Dutch randomized controlled trial is underway to validate this strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38448362
pii: S1878-7886(24)00019-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.02.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.