Removal of textile pollutants from aqueous medium using biosynthesized CuO nanoparticles: Theoretical comparative investigation via analytical model.

The work deals with the removal of two dyes, namely methylene blue (MB) and methyl orange (MO), from polluted water by adsorption onto CuO nanoparticles synthesized with a green synthesis procedure, starting from plant resources. Adsorption isotherms are determined at different temperatures aiming at investigating the adsorption mechanisms of the two dyes. The experimental results indicate that, for both MB and MO, the adsorption capacity increases with increasing temperature, with slight differences in the case of MO. Comparatively, the CuO nanoparticles show a higher MB adsorption capacity with respect to MO. A modelling analysis is carried out with a multilayer model derived from statistical physics, selected among a group of models, each hypothesizing a different number of adsorbed molecules layers. The analysis of model parameters allows determining that the adsorbate molecules exhibit a non-parallel orientation on the surface of biosynthesized CuO nanoparticles and each functional group of the adsorbent binds multiple molecules, simultaneously.The model also allows determining the number of dye molecule layers formed on adsorbent surface, in all the cases resulting higher than three, also confirming the effect of temperature on the maximum adsorption capacity.Specifically, the total number of dye layers formed on biosynthesized CuO nanoparticles surface exhibited a range of 4.17-4.55 for MB dye and of 3.01-3.51 for MO dye.Finally, the adsorption energies reveal that adsorption likely involves physical forces (all resulting all below 22 kJ/mol), i.e. hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces. The adsorption energies for the interactions between dye molecules are lower than those calculated for the interactions between the dye molecules and the adsorbent surface.

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.