Resisting wh-questions in business coaching.

business coaching clients’ resisting conversation analysis resistive actions wh-questioning sequences

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 16 06 2023
accepted: 15 01 2024
medline: 7 3 2024
pubmed: 7 3 2024
entrez: 7 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study investigates clients' resisting practices when reacting to business coaches' wh-questions. Neither the sequential organization of questions nor client resistance to questions have yet been (thoroughly) investigated for this helping professional format. Client resistance is understood as a sequentially structured, locally emerging practice that may be accomplished in more passive or active forms, that in some way withdraw from, oppose, withstand or circumvent various interactional constraints (e.g., topical, epistemic, deontic, affective) set up by the coach's question. Drawing on a corpus of systemic, solution-oriented business coaching processes and applying Conversation Analysis (CA), the following research questions are addressed: How do clients display resistance to answering coaches' wh-questions? How might these resistive actions be positioned along a passive/active, implicit/explicit or withdrawing/opposing continuum? Are certain linguistic/interactional features commonly used to accomplish resistance?. The analysis of four dyadic coaching processes with a total of eleven sessions found various forms of client resistance on the active-passive continuum, though the more explicit, active, and agentive forms are at the center of our analysis. According to the existing resistance 'action terminology' (

Identifiants

pubmed: 38449753
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1240842
pmc: PMC10914937
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1240842

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Dionne, Fleischhacker, Muntigl and Graf.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Frédérick Dionne (F)

Department of English and American Studies, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.

Melanie Fleischhacker (M)

Department of English and American Studies, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.

Peter Muntigl (P)

Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Department of Translation, Interpreting and Communication, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Eva-Maria Graf (EM)

Department of English and American Studies, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.

Classifications MeSH