Electroencephalographic guided propofol-remifentanil TCI anesthesia with and without dexmedetomidine in a geriatric population: electroencephalographic signatures and clinical evaluation.
Dexmedetomidine
EEG
Geriatric
Propofol
Titration
Journal
Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
ISSN: 1573-2614
Titre abrégé: J Clin Monit Comput
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9806357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Mar 2024
07 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
15
08
2023
accepted:
17
01
2024
medline:
7
3
2024
pubmed:
7
3
2024
entrez:
7
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Elderly and multimorbid patients are at high risk for developing unfavorable postoperative neurocognitive outcomes; however, well-adjusted and EEG-guided anesthesia may help titrate anesthesia and improve postoperative outcomes. Over the last decade, dexmedetomidine has been increasingly used as an adjunct in the perioperative setting. Its synergistic effect with propofol decreases the dose of propofol needed to induce and maintain general anesthesia. In this pilot study, we evaluate two highly standardized anesthetic regimens for their potential to prevent burst suppression and postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction in a high-risk population. Prospective, randomized clinical trial with non-blinded intervention. Operating room and post anesthesia care unit at Hospital Base San José, Osorno/Universidad Austral, Valdivia, Chile. 23 patients with scheduled non-neurologic, non-cardiac surgeries with age > 69 years and a planned intervention time > 60 min. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a propofol-remifentanil based anesthesia or an anesthetic regimen with dexmedetomidine-propofol-remifentanil. All patients underwent a slow titrated induction, followed by a target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil (n = 10) or propofol, remifentanil and continuous dexmedetomidine infusion (n = 13). We compared the perioperative EEG signatures, drug-induced changes, and neurocognitive outcomes between two anesthetic regimens in geriatric patients. We conducted a pre- and postoperative Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) test and measured the level of alertness postoperatively using a sedation agitation scale to assess neurocognitive status. During slow induction, maintenance, and emergence, burst suppression was not observed in either group; however, EEG signatures differed significantly between the two groups. In general, EEG activity in the propofol group was dominated by faster rhythms than in the dexmedetomidine group. Time to responsiveness was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.352). Finally, no significant differences were found in postoperative cognitive outcomes evaluated by the MoCa test nor sedation agitation scale up to one hour after extubation. This pilot study demonstrates that the two proposed anesthetic regimens can be safely used to slowly induce anesthesia and avoid EEG burst suppression patterns. Despite the patients being elderly and at high risk, we did not observe postoperative neurocognitive deficits. The reduced alpha power in the dexmedetomidine-treated group was not associated with adverse neurocognitive outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38451341
doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01127-4
pii: 10.1007/s10877-024-01127-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Becher RD, Vander Wyk B, Leo-Summers L, Desai MM, Gill TM. The incidence and cumulative risk of major surgery in older persons in the United States. Ann Surg. 2023;277:87–92.
pubmed: 34261884
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005077
Gill TM, Vander Wyk B, Leo-Summers L, Murphy TE, Becher RD. Population-based estimates of 1-year mortality after major surgery among community-living older US adults. JAMA Surg. 2022;157: e225155.
pubmed: 36260323
pmcid: 9582971
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5155
Vacas S, Canales C, Deiner SG, Cole DJ. Perioperative brain health in the older adult: a patient safety imperative. Anesth Analg. 2022;135:316–28.
pubmed: 35584550
pmcid: 9288500
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006090
Bedford P. Adverse cerebral effects of anaesthesia on old people. The Lancet. 1955;266:259–64.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(55)92689-1
Robinson TN, Raeburn CD, Tran ZV, Angles EM, Brenner LA, Moss M. Postoperative delirium in the elderly: risk factors and outcomes. Ann Surg. 2009;249:173–8.
pubmed: 19106695
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e4776
Saczynski JS, Marcantonio ER, Quach L, et al. Cognitive trajectories after postoperative delirium. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:30–9.
pubmed: 22762316
pmcid: 3433229
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112923
Élie M, Rousseau F, Cole M, Primeau F, McCusker J, Bellavance F. Prevalence and detection of delirium in elderly emergency department patients. CMAJ. 2000;163:977–81.
pubmed: 11068569
pmcid: 80546
Vacas S, Cole DJ, Cannesson M. Cognitive decline associated with anesthesia and surgery in older patients. JAMA. 2021;326:863–4.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4773
Inouye SK, Robinson T, Blaum C, et al. Postoperative delirium in older adults: best practice statement from the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:136-148e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.019
Card E, Pandharipande P, Tomes C, et al. Emergence from general anaesthesia and evolution of delirium signs in the post-anaesthesia care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:7.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu442
Sharma PT, Sieber FE, Zakriya KJ, et al. Recovery room delirium predicts postoperative delirium after hip-fracture repair. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1215–20.
pubmed: 16192548
doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000167383.44984.e5
Neufeld KJ, Leoutsakos J-MS, Sieber FE, et al. Outcomes of early delirium diagnosis after general anesthesia in the elderly. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:471.
pubmed: 23757476
pmcid: 4017627
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182973650
Safavynia SA, Goldstein PA. The role of neuroinflammation in postoperative cognitive dysfunction: moving from hypothesis to treatment. Front Psych. 2019;9:752.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00752
Pedemonte JC, Plummer GS, Chamadia S, et al. Electroencephalogram Burst-suppression during cardiopulmonary bypass in elderly patients mediates postoperative delirium. Anesthesiology. 2020;133:280–92.
pubmed: 32349072
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003328
Hesse S, Kreuzer M, Hight D, et al. Association of electroencephalogram trajectories during emergence from anaesthesia with delirium in the post-anaesthesia care unit: an early sign of postoperative complications. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:622–34.
pubmed: 30915984
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.016
Lutz R, Müller C, Dragovic S, et al. The absence of dominant alpha-oscillatory EEG activity during emergence from delta-dominant anesthesia predicts neurocognitive impairment- results from a prospective observational trial. J Clin Anesth. 2022;82: 110949.
pubmed: 36049381
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110949
Fritz BA, Kalarickal PL, Maybrier HR, et al. Intraoperative electroencephalogram suppression predicts postoperative delirium. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:234–42.
pubmed: 26418126
pmcid: 4684753
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000989
Soehle M, Dittmann A, Ellerkmann RK, Baumgarten G, Putensen C, Guenther U. Intraoperative burst suppression is associated with postoperative delirium following cardiac surgery: a prospective, observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15:61.
pubmed: 25928189
pmcid: 4419445
doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0051-7
Obert DP, Schweizer C, Zinn S, et al. The influence of age on EEG-based anaesthesia indices. J Clin Anesth. 2021;73: 110325.
pubmed: 33975095
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110325
Obert DP, Schneider F, Schneider G, et al. Performance of the SEDLine monitor: age dependency and time DELAY. Anesth Analg. 2023;137:887.
pubmed: 36727845
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006369
Ni K, Cooter M, Gupta DK, et al. Paradox of age: older patients receive higher age-adjusted minimum alveolar concentration fractions of volatile anaesthetics yet display higher bispectral index values. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123:288–97.
pubmed: 31279479
pmcid: 7104362
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.05.040
Chan MTV, Hedrick TL, Egan TD, et al. American society for enhanced recovery and perioperative quality initiative joint consensus statement on the role of neuromonitoring in perioperative outcomes: electroencephalography. Anesth Analg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004502 .
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004502
pubmed: 31743189
pmcid: 6800758
Berger M, Mark JB, Kreuzer M. Of parachutes, speedometers, and EEG: what evidence do we need to use devices and monitors? Anesth Analg. 2020;130:1274–7.
pubmed: 32287134
pmcid: 7735682
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004653
Eagleman SL, Chander D, Reynolds C, Ouellette NT, MacIver MB. Nonlinear dynamics captures brain states at different levels of consciousness in patients anesthetized with propofol. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0223921.
pubmed: 31665174
pmcid: 6821075
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223921
Brown EN, Lydic R, Schiff ND. General anesthesia, sleep, and coma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2638–50.
pubmed: 21190458
pmcid: 3162622
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0808281
Obert D, Sepúlveda P, Kratzer S, Schneider G, Kreuzer M. The influence of induction speed on the frontal (processed) EEG. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–13.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76323-8
Luppi AI, Spindler LRB, Menon DK, Stamatakis EA. The Inert Brain: Explaining Neural Inertia as Post-anaesthetic Sleep Inertia. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:643871.
pubmed: 33737863
pmcid: 7960927
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.643871
Sepúlveda PO, Tapia LF, Monsalves S. Neural inertia and differences between loss of and recovery from consciousness during total intravenous anaesthesia: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2019;74:801–9.
pubmed: 30835820
doi: 10.1111/anae.14609
Brown EN, Pavone KJ, Naranjo M. Multimodal general anesthesia: theory and practice. Anesth Analg. 2018;127:1246–58.
pubmed: 30252709
pmcid: 6203428
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003668
Su X, Meng Z-T, Wu X-H, et al. Dexmedetomidine for prevention of delirium in elderly patients after non-cardiac surgery: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet. 2016;388:1893–902.
pubmed: 27542303
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30580-3
Zhang L, Fang K, Tao S, et al. Electroencephalography-demonstrated mechanisms of dexmedetomidine-mediated deepening of propofol anesthesia: an observational study. Perioper Med. 2021;10:1–12.
doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00213-4
Glen JB, Servin F. Evaluation of the predictive performance of four pharmacokinetic models for propofol. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:626–32.
pubmed: 19297371
doi: 10.1093/bja/aep043
Coppens M, Van Limmen JGM, Schnider T, et al. Study of the time course of the clinical effect of propofol compared with the time course of the predicted effect-site concentration: performance of three pharmacokinetic-dynamic models. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:452–8.
pubmed: 20190259
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq028
Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II Model Appl Anesthesiol. 1997;86:24–33.
Hannivoort LN, Eleveld DJ, Proost JH, et al. Development of an optimized pharmacokinetic model of dexmedetomidine using target-controlled infusion in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:357–67.
pubmed: 26068206
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000740
Sepúlveda VPO, Cortínez LI. Intravenous Anesthesia in Obese Patients. Total Intraven Anesth Target Controll Infus: A Compr Glob Anthol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47609-4_24 .
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47609-4_24
Delgado Derio C, Araneda A, Behrens Pellegrino MI. Validación del instrumento montreal cognitive assessment en español en adultos mayores de 60 años. Neurologia. 2019;34:376.
doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2017.01.013
Tobar E, Romero C, Galleguillos T, et al. Confusion Assessment Method for diagnosing delirium in ICU patients (CAM-ICU): cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version. Med Intensiva. 2010;34:4–13.
pubmed: 19819041
doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2009.04.003
von Dincklage F, Jurth C, Schneider G, García PS, Kreuzer M. Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device. J Clin Monitor Comput. 2020;35:1047.
doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00578-9
Hentschke H, Stüttgen MC. Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;34:1887–94.
pubmed: 22082031
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07902.x
Akeju O, Westover MB, Pavone KJ, et al. Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on frontal electroencephalogram power and coherence. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:990–8.
pubmed: 25233374
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000436
Kreuzer M, Stern MA, Hight D, et al. Spectral and entropic features are altered by age in the electroencephalogram in patients under sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2020;132:1003–16.
pubmed: 32108685
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003182
Anders M, Dreismickenbecker E, Fleckenstein J, et al. EEG-based sensory testing reveals altered nociceptive processing in elite endurance athletes. Exp Brain Res. 2022;241:341.
pubmed: 36520191
pmcid: 9894977
doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06522-4
Akeju O, Pavone KJ, Westover MB, et al. A comparison of propofol-and dexmedetomidine-induced electroencephalogram dynamics using spectral and coherence analysis. J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 2014;121:978–89.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000419
Purdon P, Pavone K, Akeju O, et al. The Ageing Brain: age-dependent changes in the electroencephalogram during propofol and sevoflurane general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:i46-57.
pubmed: 26174300
pmcid: 4501918
doi: 10.1093/bja/aev213
Giattino C, Gardner J, Sbahi F, et al. Intraoperative frontal alpha-band power correlates with preoperative neurocognitive function in older adults. Front Syst Neurosci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00024 .
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00024
pubmed: 28533746
pmcid: 5420579
Gutierrez R, Egana JI, Saez I, et al. Intraoperative low alpha power in the electroencephalogram is associated with postoperative subsyndromal delirium. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019;13:56.
pubmed: 31680886
pmcid: 6813625
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00056
Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1502–16.
pubmed: 10360845
doi: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00003
Eleveld DJ, Colin P, Absalom AR, Struys M. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for propofol for broad application in anaesthesia and sedation. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:942–59.
pubmed: 29661412
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.018
Gopinathan V. Central anticholinergic syndrome — a forgotten entity. BJA: Br J Anaesth. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/el_2684 .
doi: 10.1093/bja/el_2684
Brown KE, Mirrakhimov AE, Yeddula K, Kwatra MM. Propofol and the risk of delirium: exploring the anticholinergic properties of propofol. Med Hypotheses. 2013;81:536–9.
pubmed: 23891036
doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.06.027
Kaiser-Stadler M, Altmayer P. Central anticholinergic syndrome after propofol anesthesia. Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie: AINS. 1995;30:116–7.
pubmed: 7772657
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996460
Nagase Y, Kaibara M, Uezono Y, Izumi F, Sumikawa K, Taniyama K. Propofol inhibits muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated signal transduction in Xenopus Oocytes expressing the rat M1 receptor. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1999;79:319–25.
pubmed: 10230860
doi: 10.1016/S0021-5198(19)34612-8
Ng KT, Shubash CJ, Chong JS. The effect of dexmedetomidine on delirium and agitation in patients in intensive care: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2019;74:380–92.
pubmed: 30367689
doi: 10.1111/anae.14472
Shin H-J, Woo Nam S, Kim H, et al. Postoperative Delirium after dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in healthy older adults undergoing orthopedic lower limb surgery with spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2023;138:164–71.
pubmed: 36534899
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004438
Hu J, Zhu M, Gao Z, et al. Dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing oesophagectomy with total intravenous anaesthesia: A double-blind, randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38:S9-17.
pubmed: 33122571
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001382
Xiong M, Zheng Z-X, Hu Z-R, et al. Propofol-sparing effect of different concentrations of dexmedetomidine: Comparison of gender differences. Anaesthesist. 2019;68:15.
pubmed: 30406275
doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0506-6
Dutta A, Sethi N, Sood J, et al. The effect of dexmedetomidine on propofol requirements during anesthesia administered by bispectral index-guided closed-loop anesthesia delivery system: a randomized controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000003470 .
doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003470
Scheinin A, Kallionpää RE, Li D, et al. Differentiating drug-related and state-related effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology. 2018;129:22–36.
pubmed: 29642080
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002192
Xi C, Sun S, Pan C, Ji F, Cui X, Li T. Different effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation on electroencephalogram patterns: wakefulness, moderate sedation, deep sedation and recovery. PLoS ONE. 2018;13: e0199120.
pubmed: 29920532
pmcid: 6007908
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199120
Grasshoff C, Antkowiak B. Propofol and sevoflurane depress spinal neurons in vitro via different molecular targets. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:1167–76.
pubmed: 15505453
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00017
Jorm C, Stamford J. Actions of the hypnotic anaesthetic, dexmedetomidine, on noradrenaline release and cell firing in rat locus coeruleus slices. BJA: Br J Anaesth. 1993;71:447–9.
pubmed: 8104450
doi: 10.1093/bja/71.3.447
Li D, Vlisides PE, Kelz MB, Avidan MS, Mashour GA. Dynamic cortical connectivity during general anesthesia in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:870–84.
pubmed: 30946055
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002656
Gagnon G, Hansen KT, Woolmore-Goodwin S, et al. Correcting the MoCA for education: effect on sensitivity. Can J Neurol Sci. 2013;40:678–83.
pubmed: 23968941
doi: 10.1017/S0317167100014918
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18.
pubmed: 20334633
pmcid: 2860339
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18