Social bond dynamics and the evolution of helping.
game theory
interdependence
learning
reciprocity
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Mar 2024
12 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline:
11
3
2024
pubmed:
7
3
2024
entrez:
7
3
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Empiricists often struggle to apply game theory models to real-life cases of animal cooperation. One reason is that many examples of cooperation occur in stable groups, where individuals form social bonds that influence exchanges of help in ways that are not well described by previous models, including the extent of reciprocity and how relationships are initiated. We present a game theory model exploring the conditions under which social bonds between group members promote cooperation. In the model, bonds build up from exchanges of help in a similar way as the strength of association increases in learning, as in the Rescorla-Wagner rule. The bonds in turn affect partner choice and influence helping amounts. The model has a mechanism of reciprocity for bonded pairs, which can evolve toward either loose or strict reciprocation. Several aspects of the model are inspired by observations of food sharing in vampire bats. We find that small social neighborhoods are required for the evolutionary stability of helping, either as small group sizes, or if bonded members of larger groups can form temporary (daily) smaller groupings. The costs of helping need to be fairly low, while the benefits can be substantial. The form of reciprocity that evolves is neither immediate nor very strict. Individuals in need request help based on bond strength, but there is also an evolved preference for initiating bonds with new group members. In contrast, if different groups come into temporary contact, the evolved tendency is to avoid forming bonds between groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38451941
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317736121
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2317736121Subventions
Organisme : Vetenskapsrådet (VR)
ID : 2018-03772
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests statement:The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
Behav Ecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;31(2):361-370
pubmed: 32210525
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):539-59
pubmed: 17363359
J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1365-76
pubmed: 16910958
PLoS Biol. 2021 Sep 23;19(9):e3001366
pubmed: 34555014
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:153-77
pubmed: 21740224
Nature. 2008 Jan 10;451(7175):189-92
pubmed: 18185587
Curr Biol. 2010 Dec 21;20(24):2207-10
pubmed: 21093261
Curr Biol. 2015 Nov 16;25(22):3011-6
pubmed: 26549255
J Anim Ecol. 2015 May;84(3):871-878
pubmed: 25581128
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2687-97
pubmed: 20679112
Curr Biol. 2020 Apr 6;30(7):1275-1279.e3
pubmed: 32197089
J Evol Biol. 2011 Aug;24(8):1628-39
pubmed: 21599777
Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):901-12
pubmed: 7851784
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150095
pubmed: 26729934
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 22;282(1819):
pubmed: 26582031
Curr Biol. 2019 Dec 2;29(23):4139-4144.e4
pubmed: 31679938
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Apr;5(4):419-430
pubmed: 33510431
Nature. 1998 Jul 9;394(6689):175-9
pubmed: 9671299
Biol Lett. 2017 May;13(5):
pubmed: 28539459
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Oct 25;284(1865):
pubmed: 29070720
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 02;280(1753):20122573
pubmed: 23282995
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 22;278(1707):843-8
pubmed: 20861047
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210509
pubmed: 36934762
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Apr 27;289(1973):20220281
pubmed: 35440207
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 23;280(1755):20122765
pubmed: 23345575
J Theor Biol. 1988 Jun 7;132(3):337-56
pubmed: 3226132