Rehabilitation and release of orphaned Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe: Implications for management and conservation.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 17 09 2023
accepted: 13 01 2024
medline: 7 3 2024
pubmed: 7 3 2024
entrez: 7 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Rehabilitation of injured or immature individuals has become an increasingly used conservation and management tool. However, scientific evaluation of rehabilitations is rare, raising concern about post-release welfare as well as the cost-effectiveness of spending scarce financial resources. Over the past 20 years, events of juvenile Eurasian lynx presumably orphaned have been observed in many European lynx populations. To guide the management of orphaned lynx, we documented survival, rehabilitation and fate after the release and evaluated the potential relevance of lynx orphan rehabilitation for population management and conservation implications. Data on 320 orphaned lynx was collected from 1975 to 2022 from 13 countries and nine populations. The majority of orphaned lynx (55%) were taken to rehabilitation centres or other enclosures. A total of 66 orphans were released back to nature. The portion of rehabilitated lynx who survived at least one year after release was 0.66. Release location was the best predictor for their survival. Of the 66 released lynx, ten have reproduced at least once (8 females and 2 males). Conservation implications of rehabilitation programmes include managing genetic diversity in small, isolated populations and reintroducing species to historical habitats. The lynx is a perfect model species as most reintroduced populations in Central Europe show significantly lower observed heterozygosity than most of the autochthonous populations, indicating that reintroduction bottlenecks, isolation and post-release management have long-term consequences on the genetic composition of populations. The release of translocated orphans could be a valuable contribution to Eurasian lynx conservation in Europe. It is recommended to release orphans at the distribution edge or in the frame of reintroduction projects instead of a release in the core area of a population where it is not necessary from a demographic and genetic point of view. Rehabilitation programmes can have conservation implications that extend far beyond individual welfare benefits.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38452124
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297789
pii: PONE-D-23-29775
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0297789

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Molinari-Jobin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Anja Molinari-Jobin (A)

Stiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.

Fridolin Zimmermann (F)

Stiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Stéphanie Borel (S)

Vetsuisse Faculty, Departement of Infectious diseases and Pathobiology, Institute for Fish and Wildlife Health, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Luc Le Grand (L)

Stiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.

Elena Iannino (E)

Progetto Lince Italia, Tarvisio, Italy.

Ole Anders (O)

Harz National Park, Wernigerode, Germany.

Elisa Belotti (E)

Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Nature Protection, Šumava National Park Administration, Kašperské Hory, Czech Republic.

Ludek Bufka (L)

Department of Nature Protection, Šumava National Park Administration, Kašperské Hory, Czech Republic.

Duško Ćirović (D)

Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Nolwenn Drouet-Hoguet (N)

Equipe Loup-Lynx, Office français de la biodiversité, Gières, France.

Thomas Engleder (T)

Green Heart of Europe, Lynx Project Austria Northwest, Haslach an der Mühl, Austria.

Michał Figura (M)

Association for Nature "Wolf", Twardorzeczka, Poland.
Faculty of Biology, Department of Ecology, Institute of Functional Biology and Ecology, University of Warsaw, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, Warszawa, Poland.

Christian Fuxjäger (C)

Nationalpark Kalkalpen, Molln, Austria.

Eva Gregorova (E)

Bojnice Zoological Garden, Bojnice, Slovakia.

Marco Heurich (M)

Institute for Forest and Wildlife Management, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Koppang, Norway.
Wildlife Ecology and Wildlife Management, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Sylvia Idelberger (S)

Stiftung Natur und Umwelt Rheinland-Pfalz, Mainz, Germany.

Jakub Kubala (J)

Faculty of Forestry, Department of Applied Zoology and Wildlife Management, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
DIANA-Carpathian Wildlife Research, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.

Josip Kusak (J)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department Veterinary Biology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Dime Melovski (D)

Macedonian Ecological Society, Skopje, North Macedonia.

Tomma Lilli Middelhoff (TL)

Harz National Park, Wernigerode, Germany.

Tereza Mináriková (T)

ALKA Wildlife, Dačice, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

Paolo Molinari (P)

Progetto Lince Italia, Tarvisio, Italy.

Lorane Mouzon-Moyne (L)

Centre Athenas Wildlife Rescue Center, L'étoile, France.

Gilles Moyne (G)

Centre Athenas Wildlife Rescue Center, L'étoile, France.

Robert W Mysłajek (RW)

Association for Nature "Wolf", Twardorzeczka, Poland.
Faculty of Biology, Department of Ecology, Institute of Functional Biology and Ecology, University of Warsaw, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, Warszawa, Poland.

Sabina Nowak (S)

Association for Nature "Wolf", Twardorzeczka, Poland.
Faculty of Biology, Department of Ecology, Institute of Functional Biology and Ecology, University of Warsaw, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, Warszawa, Poland.

Janis Ozolins (J)

Latvian State Forest Research Institute ''Silava", Salaspils, Latvia.

Andreas Ryser (A)

Stiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.

Bardh Sanaja (B)

Environmentally Responsible Action ERA, Peja, Kosovo.

Maryna Shkvyria (M)

Kyiv zoological park of national importance, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Teodora Sin (T)

Association for the Conservation of Biological Diversity, Focsani, Romania.

Magda Sindičić (M)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department for Game and Wildlife, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Vedran Slijepčević (V)

Department of Wildlife Management and Nature Protection, Karlovac University of Applied Sciences, Karlovac, Croatia.

Christian Stauffer (C)

Stiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.

Branislav Tám (B)

Bojnice Zoological Garden, Bojnice, Slovakia.
Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Department of Small Animal Science, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Slovakia.

Aleksander Trajce (A)

Protection and Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania, Tirana, Albania.

Josefa Volfová (J)

Department of Nature Protection, Šumava National Park Administration, Kašperské Hory, Czech Republic.
Friends of the Earth Czech Republic-Carnivore Conservation Programme, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Sybille Wölfl (S)

WildLink Institute, Association Lynx Bavaria, Waldmünchen, Germany.

Diana Zlatanova (D)

Faculty of Biology, Department of Zoology and Anthropology, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski", Sofia, Bulgaria.

Kristina Vogt (K)

Stiftung KORA, Ittigen, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH