Effects of different cryopreservation parameters on the differences between trypan blue and fluorescent SYTO 13/GelRed assays.

Cryopreservation Cryoprotectant removal Flow cytometry Fluorescent assay Glycerol H9c2 Membrane integrity SYTO 13/GelRed Slow cooling Trypan blue

Journal

Cryobiology
ISSN: 1090-2392
Titre abrégé: Cryobiology
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0006252

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 23 11 2023
revised: 30 01 2024
accepted: 05 03 2024
medline: 8 3 2024
pubmed: 8 3 2024
entrez: 7 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Post-thaw cell viability assessment is very important in cryopreservation because it is the main assessment method used to optimize the cryopreservation protocols for each cell type; hence, having standardized accurate, quick, and reliable assays for post-thaw cell viability measurements is of utmost importance. The trypan blue exclusion assay and nucleic-acid-binding fluorescence-based assays are two different methods for cell viability assessment. Both assays identify cells with damaged membranes by whether they let a compound enter the cell. In this study, these two assays are compared in the context of cryopreservation and the impacts of important cryopreservation parameters on the differences in measurements are investigated. H9c2 myoblasts were cryopreserved with different freezing protocols. Cell membrane integrities were measured immediately after thaw as well as after cryoprotectant removal by a hemocytometer-based trypan blue dye exclusion assay and a dual fluorometric SYTO 13/GelRed assay; and the results were compared. This study quantifies how i) the absence or presence of different cryoprotectants, ii) different cell-cryoprotectant incubation conditions, and iii) the presence or removal of cryoprotectants after thaw affect the differences between these two viability assays.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38452848
pii: S0011-2240(24)00038-5
doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2024.104883
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104883

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Elham Ashrafi (E)

Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Dominic Sauvageau (D)

Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

JanetA W Elliott (JW)

Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. Electronic address: janet.elliott@ualberta.ca.

Classifications MeSH