Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) enhances CPM in healthy subjects: A randomized controlled trial.

Clinical trial Conditioned pain modulation Healthy subjects Quantitative sensory testing Vagus nerve stimulation

Journal

Brain stimulation
ISSN: 1876-4754
Titre abrégé: Brain Stimul
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101465726

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 17 02 2024
accepted: 04 03 2024
medline: 8 3 2024
pubmed: 8 3 2024
entrez: 7 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Evidence suggests that transauricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) modulates the endogenous pain system and may be an alternative treatment for chronic pain conditions. To investigate the effects of taVNS in pain processing using quantitative sensory testing (QST) as a biomarker for pain sensitivity and modulation. We conducted a randomized double-blinded controlled study with 44 healthy subjects, 22 allocated to taVNS and 22 to sham taVNS. QST metrics (pain-60, temporal summation [TSPS], and conditioned pain modulation [CPM]) were the main outcomes of the study. Self-reported mood and fatigue were secondary outcomes. We performed regression analyses to evaluate the differences between pain-60 scores, TSPS, and CPM before and after intervention comparing taVNS and sham VNS groups. Moreover, Bayesian models were performed as sensitivity analysis. Our findings showed a statistically significant difference in the CPM score between taVNS and sham taVNS (beta coefficient = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.23-1.37; p = 0.007). The effect size (Cohen's d) of this difference was 0.97, which is considered a large effect size. Bayesian results (non-informative prior) supported the superiority of taVNS showing a strong probability of benefit (99.99%; beta coefficient = 0.80; 95% CrI: 0.25-1.35; BF = 234.29). No differences were found in pain-60 (unadjusted: p = 0.58; adjusted: p = 0.76) or TSPS (unadjusted: p = 0.25; adjusted: p = 0.40). Moreover, the analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between VAS fatigue and mood with CPM improvement in the taVNS group. Also, changes in fatigue significantly mediated taVNS effects. This study supports the taVNS positive effects on endogenous pain modulation in health subjects. Future RCTs using VNS in patients with chronic pain are still needed to establish the analgesic effects of taVNS in the clinical setting. NCT05801809.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Evidence suggests that transauricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) modulates the endogenous pain system and may be an alternative treatment for chronic pain conditions.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effects of taVNS in pain processing using quantitative sensory testing (QST) as a biomarker for pain sensitivity and modulation.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a randomized double-blinded controlled study with 44 healthy subjects, 22 allocated to taVNS and 22 to sham taVNS. QST metrics (pain-60, temporal summation [TSPS], and conditioned pain modulation [CPM]) were the main outcomes of the study. Self-reported mood and fatigue were secondary outcomes. We performed regression analyses to evaluate the differences between pain-60 scores, TSPS, and CPM before and after intervention comparing taVNS and sham VNS groups. Moreover, Bayesian models were performed as sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Our findings showed a statistically significant difference in the CPM score between taVNS and sham taVNS (beta coefficient = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.23-1.37; p = 0.007). The effect size (Cohen's d) of this difference was 0.97, which is considered a large effect size. Bayesian results (non-informative prior) supported the superiority of taVNS showing a strong probability of benefit (99.99%; beta coefficient = 0.80; 95% CrI: 0.25-1.35; BF = 234.29). No differences were found in pain-60 (unadjusted: p = 0.58; adjusted: p = 0.76) or TSPS (unadjusted: p = 0.25; adjusted: p = 0.40). Moreover, the analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between VAS fatigue and mood with CPM improvement in the taVNS group. Also, changes in fatigue significantly mediated taVNS effects.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study supports the taVNS positive effects on endogenous pain modulation in health subjects. Future RCTs using VNS in patients with chronic pain are still needed to establish the analgesic effects of taVNS in the clinical setting.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
NCT05801809.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38453004
pii: S1935-861X(24)00042-1
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.006
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05801809']

Types de publication

Letter

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: H.C. and J.S. are directly associated with Neurive Co, a company developing neuromodulation technologies, such as taVNS, to treat common brain diseases. Neurive funds research at the Spaulding Neuromodulation Center. F.F. is a consultant for Neurive.

Auteurs

Kevin Pacheco-Barrios (K)

Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru. Electronic address: kevin.pacheco.barrios@gmail.com.

Anna Carolyna Gianlorenco (AC)

Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Lucas Camargo (L)

Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Maria Fernanda Andrade (MF)

Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Hyuk Choi (H)

Department of Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Neurive Co., Ltd., Gimhae, Republic of Korea.

Jae-Jun Song (JJ)

Neurive Co., Ltd., Gimhae, Republic of Korea; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Felipe Fregni (F)

Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: fregni.felipe@mgh.harvard.edu.

Classifications MeSH