Lower limbs biomechanical deficits associated with stage 1 and 2 posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction during walking.

Biomechanics Kinematics Kinetics Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction Walking

Journal

Gait & posture
ISSN: 1879-2219
Titre abrégé: Gait Posture
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9416830

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 29 09 2023
revised: 01 03 2024
accepted: 06 03 2024
medline: 10 3 2024
pubmed: 10 3 2024
entrez: 9 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction (PTTD) is a chronic degenerative musculoskeletal disorder causing a progressive ankle complex and arch collapse altering lower limb biomechanics. However, biomechanical changes associated with stage 1 and 2 PTTD need to be better characterized during walking to guide clinical recommendations and improve non-operative treatments. What are the lower limb kinematic and kinetic differences between individuals with stage 1 (PTTD1), individuals with stage 2 PTTD (PTTD2) and healthy counterparts during gait? Sixteen PTTD1, 11 PTTD2 and 20 healthy controls were included in this multicentric case-control study to compare their lower limb gait biomechanics. Kinematic and kinetic data were recorded using a three-dimensional motion capture system and a force plate. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was used to compare lower limb joint motion and moments between groups during the stance phase. PTTD1 had minimal biomechanical differences compared with the control group. In contrast, PTTD2 presented significant differences compared with controls and PTTD1. At the ankle, PTTD2 exhibited greater plantarflexion and eversion angles and midfoot dorsiflexion and inversion angles throughout stance compared with controls and PTTD1. PTTD2 presented lower midfoot abduction moments compared with controls. These changes led PTTD2 to exhibit knee and hip adaptative biomechanical mechanisms in the frontal and transverse planes in late stance. PTTD2 had greater knee internal rotation angles and smaller knee external rotation moments compared to controls. PTTD2 had smaller hip internal rotation angles compared with PTTD1 and smaller hip adduction moments compared with controls. PTTD1 showed minimal biomechanical differences compared to controls and important differences compared to PTTD2. The lower limb biomechanical deficits accentuate as the pathology advances from stage 1 to stage 2. PTTD is a progressive condition needing early clinical management at stage 1 to avoid successive biomechanical changes associated with stage 2.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction (PTTD) is a chronic degenerative musculoskeletal disorder causing a progressive ankle complex and arch collapse altering lower limb biomechanics. However, biomechanical changes associated with stage 1 and 2 PTTD need to be better characterized during walking to guide clinical recommendations and improve non-operative treatments.
RESEARCH QUESTION OBJECTIVE
What are the lower limb kinematic and kinetic differences between individuals with stage 1 (PTTD1), individuals with stage 2 PTTD (PTTD2) and healthy counterparts during gait?
METHODS METHODS
Sixteen PTTD1, 11 PTTD2 and 20 healthy controls were included in this multicentric case-control study to compare their lower limb gait biomechanics. Kinematic and kinetic data were recorded using a three-dimensional motion capture system and a force plate. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was used to compare lower limb joint motion and moments between groups during the stance phase.
RESULTS RESULTS
PTTD1 had minimal biomechanical differences compared with the control group. In contrast, PTTD2 presented significant differences compared with controls and PTTD1. At the ankle, PTTD2 exhibited greater plantarflexion and eversion angles and midfoot dorsiflexion and inversion angles throughout stance compared with controls and PTTD1. PTTD2 presented lower midfoot abduction moments compared with controls. These changes led PTTD2 to exhibit knee and hip adaptative biomechanical mechanisms in the frontal and transverse planes in late stance. PTTD2 had greater knee internal rotation angles and smaller knee external rotation moments compared to controls. PTTD2 had smaller hip internal rotation angles compared with PTTD1 and smaller hip adduction moments compared with controls.
SIGNIFICANCE CONCLUSIONS
PTTD1 showed minimal biomechanical differences compared to controls and important differences compared to PTTD2. The lower limb biomechanical deficits accentuate as the pathology advances from stage 1 to stage 2. PTTD is a progressive condition needing early clinical management at stage 1 to avoid successive biomechanical changes associated with stage 2.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38460464
pii: S0966-6362(24)00080-8
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.03.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10-16

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dominic Chicoine reports financial support was provided by Quebec Health Research Fund. Phillipe Corbeil reports financial support was provided by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Auteurs

Ahmed Dami (A)

Department of Human Kinetics, University du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351, Boul. des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada; Groupe de Recherche sur les Affections Neuromusculosquelettiques (GRAN), 3351, Boul. des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada. Electronic address: ahmed.dami@uqtr.ca.

Dominic Chicoine (D)

Department of Human Kinetics, University du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351, Boul. des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada.

Eléna Payen (E)

Department of Human Kinetics, University du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351, Boul. des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada; Groupe de Recherche sur les Affections Neuromusculosquelettiques (GRAN), 3351, Boul. des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada.

Marc Bouchard (M)

CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 11, côte du Palais, Québec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada.

Etienne L Belzile (EL)

CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 11, côte du Palais, Québec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada.

Phillipe Corbeil (P)

Department of Kinesiology, University Laval, 2325, rue de l'Université, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), 525, Boul. Wilfrid-Hamel, Québec, QC G1M 2S8, Canada.

Gabriel Moisan (G)

Department of Human Kinetics, University du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351, Boul. des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada; Groupe de Recherche sur les Affections Neuromusculosquelettiques (GRAN), 3351, Boul. des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada; Department of Kinesiology, University Laval, 2325, rue de l'Université, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), 525, Boul. Wilfrid-Hamel, Québec, QC G1M 2S8, Canada.

Classifications MeSH