Exploring the sex-associated differences in molars fused roots.

Molar anatomy congenital sex tooth abnormalities

Journal

Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft
ISSN: 1618-0402
Titre abrégé: Ann Anat
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100963897

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 18 10 2023
revised: 19 02 2024
accepted: 05 03 2024
medline: 10 3 2024
pubmed: 10 3 2024
entrez: 9 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Human sexual dimorphism is associated with many biological characteristics, including dental variables. To investigate if molars fused roots present sex-associated differences. Panoramic radiographs were used to investigate the frequency and distribution of permanent molars fused roots. Only patients with all first and second permanent molars were included. Third molars were not investigated. Any molar with roots fused apical to the usual furcal position were considered molar fused roots. Comparisons between males and females were performed using chi-square or Fisher's and Mann-Whitney tests and the established alpha was 5% (p<0.05). Sex-differential liability models were also proposed. A total of 84 males and 86 females were included and 1360 molars were analyzed. Among them, 46 (26.06%) present at least one molar with fused root. Second maxillary molars were the most affected teeth. There was an association between sex and molars with fused roots. Females had a 3.4 higher chance to present fused roots than males (OR=3.4, CI 95% 1.6-6.8; p=0.0008). The female: male ratio of molars with fused roots was 2.5:1. The number of molars with fused roots ranged from 1 to 6 per patient, and the mean number of Females presented more molars with fused roots (mean = 1.01; standard deviation = 1.52) than males (mean = 0.31; standard deviation = 0.85) (p<0.05). Molar fused root of permanent teeth presents sex-associated differences, in which females are more affected than males. Our results support sex-differential liability models for molars fused roots.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Human sexual dimorphism is associated with many biological characteristics, including dental variables.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To investigate if molars fused roots present sex-associated differences.
METHODS METHODS
Panoramic radiographs were used to investigate the frequency and distribution of permanent molars fused roots. Only patients with all first and second permanent molars were included. Third molars were not investigated. Any molar with roots fused apical to the usual furcal position were considered molar fused roots. Comparisons between males and females were performed using chi-square or Fisher's and Mann-Whitney tests and the established alpha was 5% (p<0.05). Sex-differential liability models were also proposed.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 84 males and 86 females were included and 1360 molars were analyzed. Among them, 46 (26.06%) present at least one molar with fused root. Second maxillary molars were the most affected teeth. There was an association between sex and molars with fused roots. Females had a 3.4 higher chance to present fused roots than males (OR=3.4, CI 95% 1.6-6.8; p=0.0008). The female: male ratio of molars with fused roots was 2.5:1. The number of molars with fused roots ranged from 1 to 6 per patient, and the mean number of Females presented more molars with fused roots (mean = 1.01; standard deviation = 1.52) than males (mean = 0.31; standard deviation = 0.85) (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Molar fused root of permanent teeth presents sex-associated differences, in which females are more affected than males. Our results support sex-differential liability models for molars fused roots.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38460859
pii: S0940-9602(24)00037-2
doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2024.152245
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

152245

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Maria Eduarda Nunis Locks (MEN)

Department of Dentistry and Post-Graduate Program on Health and Environment, Univille- University from the Joinville Region, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Erika Calvano Küchler (EC)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University from Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Leonardo Santos Antunes (LS)

Department of Specific Formation of the Health Institute of Nova Friburgo (FFE-ISNF) Fluminense Federal University, Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Alice Corrêa Silva-Sousa (AC)

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Natanael Henrique Ribeiro Mattos (NHR)

School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University from Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Camila Paiva Perin (CP)

School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University from Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Paulo Henrique Condeixa de França (PHC)

Department of Dentistry and Post-Graduate Program on Health and Environment, Univille- University from the Joinville Region, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Peter Proff (P)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Regensburg. Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

Christian Kirschneck (C)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Flares Baratto-Filho (F)

Department of Dentistry and Post-Graduate Program on Health and Environment, Univille- University from the Joinville Region, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil; School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University from Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH