Simulation models for aggregated data meta-analysis: Evaluation of pooling effect sizes and publication biases.

DerSimonian and Laird Monte Carlo simulation study Trim & Fill heteroscedastic mixed effects model meta-analysis precision-effect test and precision-effect estimate with standard errors

Journal

Statistical methods in medical research
ISSN: 1477-0334
Titre abrégé: Stat Methods Med Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9212457

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 10 3 2024
pubmed: 10 3 2024
entrez: 9 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Simulation studies are commonly used to evaluate the performance of newly developed meta-analysis methods. For methodology that is developed for an aggregated data meta-analysis, researchers often resort to simulation of the aggregated data directly, instead of simulating individual participant data from which the aggregated data would be calculated in reality. Clearly, distributional characteristics of the aggregated data statistics may be derived from distributional assumptions of the underlying individual data, but they are often not made explicit in publications. This article provides the distribution of the aggregated data statistics that were derived from a heteroscedastic mixed effects model for continuous individual data and a procedure for directly simulating the aggregated data statistics. We also compare our simulation approach with other simulation approaches used in literature. We describe their theoretical differences and conduct a simulation study for three meta-analysis methods: DerSimonian and Laird method for pooling aggregated study effect sizes and the Trim & Fill and precision-effect test and precision-effect estimate with standard errors method for adjustment of publication bias. We demonstrate that the choice of simulation model for aggregated data may have an impact on (the conclusions of) the performance of the meta-analysis method. We recommend the use of multiple aggregated data simulation models to investigate the sensitivity in the performance of the meta-analysis method. Additionally, we recommend that researchers try to make the individual participant data model explicit and derive from this model the distributional consequences of the aggregated statistics to help select appropriate aggregated data simulation models.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38460950
doi: 10.1177/09622802231206474
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

9622802231206474

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Edwin R van den Heuvel (ER)

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, USA.

Osama Almalik (O)

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Zhuozhao Zhan (Z)

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH