Antenatal education - Putting research into practice: A guideline review.

Antenatal care Childbirth and parent education Clinical guidelines Guideline review Pregnancy

Journal

Midwifery
ISSN: 1532-3099
Titre abrégé: Midwifery
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 8510930

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 24 10 2023
revised: 05 02 2024
accepted: 25 02 2024
medline: 11 3 2024
pubmed: 11 3 2024
entrez: 10 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Antenatal care guidelines used in Australia are inconsistent in their recommendations for childbirth and parenting education (CBPE) classes for preparation of women and parents for pregnancy, childbirth, and early parenting. Clinical practice guidelines in maternity care are developed to assist healthcare practitioners and consumers to make decisions about appropriate care. The benefit of such guidelines relies on the translation and quality of the evidence contained within them. In the context of antenatal care guidelines, there is a potential evidence-practice gap with regard to CBPE. This review aims to appraise the quality of Australian antenatal care guidelines in their recommendations for CBPE for women and partners. Publicly available Australian antenatal care guidelines were identified including local health district websites and professional organisations pertaining to maternity care. Guidelines were reviewed independently, and the quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Five guidelines were included in the review and appraised using AGREE II. With the exception of the Department of Health Pregnancy Care Guidelines, guidelines scored poorly across all six domains. When appraised according to specific CBPE recommendations for rigour of development, presentation, and applicability; all guidelines received low scores. Prenatal services remain largely unregulated across the board, with no systematic approach to make recommendations for CBPE and guidelines lacking in rigour with regard to CBPE. Within the guidelines reviewed there was a lack of evidence-based recommendations provided for educators or consumers regarding childbirth and parenting education.

Sections du résumé

PROBLEM OBJECTIVE
Antenatal care guidelines used in Australia are inconsistent in their recommendations for childbirth and parenting education (CBPE) classes for preparation of women and parents for pregnancy, childbirth, and early parenting.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Clinical practice guidelines in maternity care are developed to assist healthcare practitioners and consumers to make decisions about appropriate care. The benefit of such guidelines relies on the translation and quality of the evidence contained within them. In the context of antenatal care guidelines, there is a potential evidence-practice gap with regard to CBPE.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
This review aims to appraise the quality of Australian antenatal care guidelines in their recommendations for CBPE for women and partners.
METHODS METHODS
Publicly available Australian antenatal care guidelines were identified including local health district websites and professional organisations pertaining to maternity care. Guidelines were reviewed independently, and the quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Five guidelines were included in the review and appraised using AGREE II. With the exception of the Department of Health Pregnancy Care Guidelines, guidelines scored poorly across all six domains. When appraised according to specific CBPE recommendations for rigour of development, presentation, and applicability; all guidelines received low scores.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Prenatal services remain largely unregulated across the board, with no systematic approach to make recommendations for CBPE and guidelines lacking in rigour with regard to CBPE.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Within the guidelines reviewed there was a lack of evidence-based recommendations provided for educators or consumers regarding childbirth and parenting education.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38461784
pii: S0266-6138(24)00044-5
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103960
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

103960

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Alessia Ferri (A)

National School of Medicine, Auburn Clinical School, University of Notre Dame Australia, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: Alessia.ferri@my.nd.edu.au.

Kerry L Sutcliffe (KL)

National School of Medicine, Auburn Clinical School, University of Notre Dame Australia, NSW, Australia.

Christine Catling (C)

Collective for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Australia.

Elizabeth Newnham (E)

School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

Kate M Levett (KM)

National School of Medicine, Auburn Clinical School, University of Notre Dame Australia, NSW, Australia; Collective for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Australia; NICM Health Research Institute, and THRI, Western Sydney University, Australia.

Classifications MeSH