Third stage of labor: evidence-based practice for prevention of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

carbetocin delayed cord clamping ergometrine external uterine massage hemorrhage labor misoprostol obstetrical complications obstetrics oxytocin postpartum hemorrhage third stage care third stage of labor tranexamic acid umbilical cord drainage umbilical cord milking

Journal

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1097-6868
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 06 06 2022
revised: 22 11 2022
accepted: 23 11 2022
medline: 11 3 2024
pubmed: 11 3 2024
entrez: 10 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The third stage of labor is defined as the time period between delivery of the fetus through delivery of the placenta. During a normal third stage, uterine contractions lead to separation and expulsion of the placenta from the uterus. Postpartum hemorrhage is a relatively common complication of the third stage of labor. Strategies have been studied to mitigate the risk of postpartum hemorrhage, leading to the widespread implementation of active management of the third stage of labor. Initially, active management of the third stage of labor consisted of a bundle of interventions including administration of a uterotonic agent, early cord clamping, controlled cord traction, and external uterine massage. However, the effectiveness of these interventions as a bundle has been questioned, leading to abandonment of some components in recent years. Despite this, upon review of selected international guidelines, we found that the term "active management of the third stage of labor" was still used, but recommendations for and against individual interventions were variable and not necessarily supported by current evidence. In this review, we: (1) examine the physiology of the third stage of labor, (2) present evidence related to interventions that prevent postpartum hemorrhage and promote maternal and neonatal health, (3) review current global guidelines and recommendations for practice, and (4) propose future areas of investigation. The interventions in this review include pharmacologic agents to prevent postpartum hemorrhage, cord clamping, cord milking, cord traction, cord drainage, early skin-to-skin contact, and nipple stimulation. Treatment of complications of the third stage of labor is outside of the scope of this review. We conclude that current evidence supports the use of effective pharmacologic postpartum hemorrhage prophylaxis, delayed cord clamping, early skin-to-skin contact, and controlled cord traction at delivery when feasible. The most effective uterotonic regimens for preventing postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery include oxytocin plus ergometrine; oxytocin plus misoprostol; or carbetocin. After cesarean delivery, carbetocin or oxytocin as a bolus are the most effective regimens. There is inconsistent evidence regarding the use of tranexamic acid in addition to a uterotonic compared with a uterotonic alone for postpartum hemorrhage prevention after all deliveries. Because of differences in patient comorbidities, costs, and availability of resources and staff, decisions to use specific prevention strategies are dependent on patient- and system-level factors. We recommend that the term "active management of the third stage of labor" as a combined intervention no longer be used. Instead, we recommend that "third stage care" be adopted, which promotes the implementation of evidence-based interventions that incorporate practices that are safe and beneficial for both the woman and neonate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38462248
pii: S0002-9378(22)02204-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.1298
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S1046-S1060.e1

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Alyssa R Hersh (AR)

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; FUNDARED-MATERNA, Bogotá, Colombia. Electronic address: ahersh7@gmail.com.

Guillermo Carroli (G)

Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina.

G Justus Hofmeyr (GJ)

University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana; University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa; Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.

Bharti Garg (B)

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Metin Gülmezoglu (M)

Concept Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland.

Pisake Lumbiganon (P)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Bremen De Mucio (B)

Latin American Center for Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health, Montevideo, Uruguay.

Sarah Saleem (S)

Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Mario Philip R Festin (MPR)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.

Suneeta Mittal (S)

Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, India.

Jorge Andres Rubio-Romero (JA)

Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.

Tsungai Chipato (T)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Catalina Valencia (C)

FUNDARED-MATERNA, Bogotá, Colombia; Medicina Fetal SAS, Medellin, Colombia.

Jorge E Tolosa (JE)

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; FUNDARED-MATERNA, Bogotá, Colombia; St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA.

Classifications MeSH