Outpatient cervical ripening and labor induction with low-dose vaginal misoprostol reduces the interval to delivery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

network meta-analysis outpatient cervical ripening methods overview

Journal

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1097-6868
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 01 07 2022
revised: 26 09 2022
accepted: 26 09 2022
medline: 11 3 2024
pubmed: 11 3 2024
entrez: 10 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have summarized the evidence on the efficacy and safety of various outpatient cervical ripening methods. However, the method with the highest efficacy and safety profile has not been determined conclusively. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of cervical ripening methods currently employed in the outpatient setting. With the assistance of an experienced medical librarian, we performed a systematic search of the literature using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We systematically searched electronic databases from inception to January 14, 2020. We considered randomized controlled trials comparing a variety of methods for outpatient cervical ripening. We conducted a frequentist random effects network meta-analysis employing data from randomized controlled trials. We performed a direct, pairwise meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of various outpatient cervical ripening methods, including placebo. We employed ranking strategies to determine the most efficacious method using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve; a higher surface under the cumulative ranking curve value implied a more efficacious method. We assessed the following outcomes: time from intervention to delivery, cesarean delivery rates, changes in the Bishop score, need for additional ripening methods, incidence of Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes, and uterine hyperstimulation. We included data from 42 randomized controlled trials including 6093 participants. When assessing the efficacy of all methods, 25 μg vaginal misoprostol was the most efficacious in reducing the time from intervention to delivery (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 1.0) without increasing the odds of cesarean delivery, the need for additional ripening methods, the incidence of a low Apgar score, or uterine hyperstimulation. Acupressure (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.3) and primrose oil (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.2) were the least effective methods in reducing the time to delivery interval. Among effective methods, 50 mg oral mifepristone was associated with the lowest odds of cesarean delivery (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.9). When balancing efficacy and safety, vaginal misoprostol 25 μg represents the best method for outpatient cervical ripening.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38462254
pii: S0002-9378(22)00798-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.043
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S716-S728.e61

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Gustavo Vilchez (G)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO. Electronic address: vilchezg@umkc.edu.

Rachel Meislin (R)

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Lifeng Lin (L)

Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.

Katherine Gonzalez (K)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL.

Jordan McKinney (J)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL.

Andrew Kaunitz (A)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL.

Joanne Stone (J)

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Luis Sanchez-Ramos (L)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL.

Classifications MeSH