Immune checkpoint inhibitor doublets: Are they beneficial for older patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anti-CTLA-4 Anti-PD(L1) Combinations Immune checkpoint inhibitors Older meta-analysis

Journal

Journal of geriatric oncology
ISSN: 1879-4076
Titre abrégé: J Geriatr Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101534770

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 10 10 2023
revised: 02 02 2024
accepted: 04 03 2024
medline: 11 3 2024
pubmed: 11 3 2024
entrez: 10 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly transformed the treatment landscape for advanced malignancies. These inhibitors bolster the immune system's capacity to detect and destroy cancer cells. ICIs used in cancer immunotherapy are primarily categorized into two groups: anti-PD-1/L1 and anti-CTLA-4. The application of combination ICI therapy (ICI doublets) in older patients prompts questions about their relative efficacy compared to standard therapies, particularly in comparison to younger patient cohorts. This study involved an extensive review of literature from databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Our primary aim was to assess overall survival (OS) outcomes in a cohort of older patients, specifically those aged 65 and above, undergoing treatment for advanced cancers. The treatment modalities considered included ICI doublets, ICI monotherapy (alone or in combination with non-ICI drugs), and non-ICI therapies. The study aimed to compare the OS outcomes across these different therapeutic approaches. The analysis incorporated data from 18 trials, indicating that patients treated with ICI doublets exhibited a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to the control group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.96; P < 0.01). The addition of CTLA-4 inhibitors did not show significant advantages over anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.02; P = 0.13). When compared to non-ICI therapies, such as chemotherapy alone, ICI doublets demonstrated improved OS outcomes (HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97; P < 0.01). Our findings suggest that ICI doublets may offer a modest improvement in the outcomes of older cancer patients compared to non-ICI-based treatments. Consequently, the use of ICI doublets in older patients should be considered on an individual basis, prioritizing cases where there are clear advantages over conventional therapy. This study underscores the importance of developing personalized treatment strategies for older patients, necessitating a cautious and individualized approach in medication selection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38462434
pii: S1879-4068(24)00039-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101741
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101741

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None to declare.

Auteurs

Lorenzo Dottorini (L)

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy. Electronic address: ldottorini@gmail.com.

Antonio Ghidini (A)

Oncology Unit, Casa di cura Igea, Milano, Italy.

Rita Deda (R)

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy.

Italo Sarno (I)

CROB, Rionero in Vulture, (PZ), Italy.

Matteo Cavallone (M)

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy.

Andrea Luciani (A)

Oncology Unit, Casa di cura Igea, Milano, Italy.

Fausto Petrelli (F)

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy.

Classifications MeSH