Cognitive dissonance and mindset perturbations during crisis: "eco-socio-psycho-somatic" perspectives.

Affective-cognitive dissonance Infodemic Socioecological model Systems model of the mind

Journal

World journal of psychiatry
ISSN: 2220-3206
Titre abrégé: World J Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101610480

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 12 09 2023
revised: 08 12 2023
accepted: 03 01 2024
medline: 11 3 2024
pubmed: 11 3 2024
entrez: 11 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mandatory and restrictive health regulations during the corona pandemic caused psychic disorders in many people, which even led to clinically relevant mental disorders. At the same time, there was gradually a polarization of opinions among the population. In order to improve future pandemic management, an integrative understanding of these psychosocial processes therefore seems useful. Here we start theoretically with the mental effects of inconsistencies of the information environment by referring to concepts such as the theory of cognitive dissonance. In a next step, we use the psychodynamic theory to understand the affective-motivational defense mechanisms underlying these cognitive states and processes. However, a broader theoretical framework of psychoanalysis seems to make sense, because self-referential processing also influences the style of thinking. For this reason, we use a more comprehensive psychological systems theoretical framework model to integrate these different perspectives. This integrative view refers in part to basic knowledge of health psychology regarding the resistance of unhealthy ways of thinking and behaviors and the possibilities for interventions for change. We then extend this model to a broader picture that also covers the relationship between men and their environment. This results in the perspective of a multidimensional socioecological theoretical framework, which as a heuristic reference model and related to other ecological approaches could also be helpful for various theoretical questions for public health, and could provide a better public understanding of health issues. In line with this perspective, we hypothesize that with regard to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the acceptance of public health narratives could be increased if a more consistent picture of the scientific descriptions and explanations of the pandemic - similar to the model proposed - could be provided, which would enable the understanding of the origin, course and countermeasures, and thus could have positive collective psycho-hygienic effects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38464764
doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i2.215
pmc: PMC10921281
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

215-224

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Felix Tretter (F)

Department of Systems Medicine and Healthcare Systems, Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science, Vienna 1040, Austria.

Henriette Löffler-Stastka (H)

Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria. henriette.loeffler-stastka@meduniwien.ac.at.

Classifications MeSH