Cost evaluation of continuation of therapy with dalbavancin compared to standard-of-care antibiotics alone in hospitalized persons who inject drugs with severe gram-positive infections.

cost evaluation dalbavancin gram positive lipoglycopeptide persons who inject drugs

Journal

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
ISSN: 1535-2900
Titre abrégé: Am J Health Syst Pharm
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9503023

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 27 01 2024
medline: 11 3 2024
pubmed: 11 3 2024
entrez: 11 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Persons who inject drugs (PWID) are at risk for severe gram-positive infections and may require prolonged hospitalization and intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Dalbavancin (DBV) is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide that may reduce costs and provide effective treatment in this population. This was a retrospective review of PWID with severe gram-positive infections. Patients admitted from January 1, 2017, to November 1, 2019 (standard-of-care [SOC] group) and from November 15, 2019, to March 31, 2022 (DBV group) were included. The primary outcome was the total cost to the healthcare system. Secondary outcomes included hospital days saved and treatment failure. A total of 87 patients were included (37 in the DBV group and 50 in the SOC group). Patients were a median of 34 years old and were predominantly Caucasian (82%). Staphylococcus aureus (82%) was the most common organism, and bacteremia (71%) was the most common type of infection. Compared to the SOC group, the DBV group would have had a median of 14 additional days of hospitalization if they had stayed to complete their therapy (P = 0.014). The median total cost to the healthcare system was significantly lower in the DBV group than in the SOC group ($31,698.00 vs $45,093.50; P = 0.035). The rate of treatment failure was similar between the groups (32.4% in the DBV group vs 36% in the SOC group; P = 0.729). DBV is a cost-saving alternative to SOC IV antibiotics for severe gram-positive infections in PWID, with similar treatment outcomes. Larger prospective studies, including other patient populations, may demonstrate additional benefit.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38465838
pii: 7625330
doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae025
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2024. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Devin Donnelly (D)

Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center: Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.

Kelly E Pillinger (KE)

PRIME Education, LLC, New York, NY, USA.

Ashita Debnath (A)

Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.

William DePasquale (W)

Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center: Highland Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.

Sonal Munsiff (S)

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester Medical Center: Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.

Ted Louie (T)

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester Medical Center: Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.

Courtney Marie Cora Jones (CMC)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center: Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.

Stephanie Shulder (S)

Department of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center: Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH