Development of a New Tool for Writing Research Key Information in Plain Language.


Journal

Health literacy research and practice
ISSN: 2474-8307
Titre abrégé: Health Lit Res Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101712185

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 12 3 2024
pubmed: 11 3 2024
entrez: 11 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The complexity of research informed consent forms makes it hard for potential study participants to make informed consent decisions. In response, new rules for human research protection require informed consent forms to begin with a key information section that potential study participants can read and understand. This research study builds on exiting guidance on how to write research key information using plain language. The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable tool to evaluate and improve the readability, understandability, and actionability of the key information section on research informed consent forms. We developed an initial list of measures to include on the tool through literature review; established face and content validity of measures with expert input; conducted four rounds of reliability testing with four groups of reviewers; and established construct validity with potential research participants. We identified 87 candidate measures via literature review. After expert review, we included 23 items on the initial tool. Twenty-four raters conducted 4 rounds of reliability testing on 10 informed consent forms. After each round, we revised or eliminated items to improve agreement. In the final round of testing, 18 items demonstrated substantial inter-rater agreement per Fleiss' Kappa (average = .73) and Gwet's AC1 (average = .77). Intra-rater agreement was substantial per Cohen's Kappa (average = .74) and almost perfect per Gwet's AC1 (average = 0.84). Focus group feedback ( The RUAKI Indicator is an 18-item tool with evidence of validity and reliability investigators can use to write the key information section on their informed consent forms that potential study participants can read, understand, and act on to make informed decisions. [ Research informed consent forms describe key information about research studies. People need this information to decide if they want to be in a study or not. A helpful form begins with a short, easy-to-read key information section. This study created a tool researchers can use to write the key information about their research people can read, understand, and use.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
The complexity of research informed consent forms makes it hard for potential study participants to make informed consent decisions. In response, new rules for human research protection require informed consent forms to begin with a key information section that potential study participants can read and understand. This research study builds on exiting guidance on how to write research key information using plain language.
OBJECTIVE UNASSIGNED
The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable tool to evaluate and improve the readability, understandability, and actionability of the key information section on research informed consent forms.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
We developed an initial list of measures to include on the tool through literature review; established face and content validity of measures with expert input; conducted four rounds of reliability testing with four groups of reviewers; and established construct validity with potential research participants.
KEY RESULTS UNASSIGNED
We identified 87 candidate measures via literature review. After expert review, we included 23 items on the initial tool. Twenty-four raters conducted 4 rounds of reliability testing on 10 informed consent forms. After each round, we revised or eliminated items to improve agreement. In the final round of testing, 18 items demonstrated substantial inter-rater agreement per Fleiss' Kappa (average = .73) and Gwet's AC1 (average = .77). Intra-rater agreement was substantial per Cohen's Kappa (average = .74) and almost perfect per Gwet's AC1 (average = 0.84). Focus group feedback (
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
The RUAKI Indicator is an 18-item tool with evidence of validity and reliability investigators can use to write the key information section on their informed consent forms that potential study participants can read, understand, and act on to make informed decisions. [
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS
Research informed consent forms describe key information about research studies. People need this information to decide if they want to be in a study or not. A helpful form begins with a short, easy-to-read key information section. This study created a tool researchers can use to write the key information about their research people can read, understand, and use.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Research informed consent forms describe key information about research studies. People need this information to decide if they want to be in a study or not. A helpful form begins with a short, easy-to-read key information section. This study created a tool researchers can use to write the key information about their research people can read, understand, and use.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38466225
doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240218-01
pmc: PMC10923613
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e30-e37

Références

N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):721-6
pubmed: 12594317
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30
pubmed: 7898294
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008 May;61(Pt 1):29-48
pubmed: 18482474
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Aug;8(4):355-6
pubmed: 25580939
ANZ J Surg. 2014 Apr;84(4):207-10
pubmed: 24812707
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e2110843
pubmed: 33909052
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Oct;65(10):2229-38
pubmed: 19686403
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Sep;15(5):629-37
pubmed: 24951489
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):121-6
pubmed: 22782275
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-9
pubmed: 2348207
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 12;8(7):e021613
pubmed: 30002013
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94
pubmed: 26571285
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):561-6
pubmed: 18335281
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e2110848
pubmed: 33909058
Am J Bioeth. 2021 May;21(5):70-72
pubmed: 33945415
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:203-21
pubmed: 23030571
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 Jan-Apr;30(1):84-88
pubmed: 28707643
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):395-403
pubmed: 24973195
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Dec;1(6):361-365
pubmed: 29707258

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH