Serial processing of proximity groups and similarity groups.

Gestalt Perceptual grouping Proximity Serial and parallel processing Similarity

Journal

Attention, perception & psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-393X
Titre abrégé: Atten Percept Psychophys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101495384

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Mar 2024
Historique:
accepted: 05 02 2024
medline: 12 3 2024
pubmed: 12 3 2024
entrez: 12 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Proximity and feature similarity are two important determinants of perceptual grouping in vision. When viewing visual scenes conveying both grouping options simultaneously, people most usually detect proximity groups faster than similarity groups. This article demonstrates that perceptual judgments of grouping orientation guided by either proximity or contrast similarity are indicative of a sequential organization of grouping operations in the visual pathway, which lends a temporal processing advantage to proximity grouping (Experiment 1). Invoking the double-factorial paradigm, latent cognitive architecture for perceptual grouping is also investigated in a task with redundant signals (Experiment 2). Reaction time data from this task is assessed in terms of the race model inequality, workload capacity analysis, and interaction contrasts of means and survivor functions. Again, empirical benchmarks indicate serial processing of proximity groups and similarity groups, with a self-terminating stopping rule for processing. A subset of participants exhibit atypical performance metrics, hinting at possible individual differences in configural visual processing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38468024
doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02861-2
pii: 10.3758/s13414-024-02861-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : 381713393

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Altieri, N., Fifić, M., Little, D. R., & Yang, C.-T. (2017). Historical foundations and a tutorial introduction to Systems Factorial Technology. In D. R. Little, N. Altieri, M. Fifić, & C.-T. Yang (Eds.), Systems Factorial Technology (pp. 3–25). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804315-8.00002-1
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804315-8.00002-1
Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212239
doi: 10.3758/BF03212239
Beck, D. M., & Palmer, S. E. (2002). Top-down influences on perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1071–1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1071
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1071 pubmed: 12421056
Ben-Av, M. B., & Sagi, D. (1995). Perceptual grouping by similarity and proximity: Experimental results can be predicted by intensity autocorrelations. Vision Research, 35(6), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(94)00173-J
doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00173-J pubmed: 7740775
Colonius, H., & Vorberg, D. (1994). Distribution inequalities for parallel models with unlimited capacity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1994.1002
doi: 10.1006/jmps.1994.1002
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1(1), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
doi: 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
Dobbins, A. C., & Grossmann, J. K. (2002). Recurrent global dynamics underlie perceptual grouping. Neurocomputing, 44–46, 783–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00472-1
doi: 10.1016/S0925-2312(02)00472-1
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
Fang, F., Kersten, D., & Murray, S. O. (2008). Perceptual grouping and inverse fMRI activity patterns in human visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 8(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.7.2
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136
doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136
Grassi, P. R., Zaretskaya, N., & Bartels, A. (2016). Parietal cortex mediates perceptual Gestalt grouping independent of stimulus size. NeuroImage, 133, 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.008
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.008 pubmed: 26975554
Grossberg, S., & Williamson, J. (2001). A neural model of how horizontal and interlaminar connections of visual cortex develop into adult circuits that carry out perceptual grouping and learning. Cerebral cortex, 11, 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/11.1.37
doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.1.37 pubmed: 11113034
Han, S. (2004). Interactions between proximity and similarity grouping: An event-related brain potential study in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 367(1), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.098
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.098 pubmed: 15308293
Han, S., Ding, Y., & Song, Y. (2002). Neural mechanisms of perceptual grouping in humans as revealed by high density event related potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 319(1), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02502-2
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02502-2 pubmed: 11814646
Han, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Interactions between perceptual organization based on Gestalt laws and those based on hierarchical processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(7), 1287–1298. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206180
doi: 10.3758/BF03206180
Han, S., Jiang, Y., Mao, L., Humphreys, G. W., & Qin, J. (2005). Attentional modulation of perceptual grouping in human visual cortex: ERP studies. Human Brain Mapping, 26(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20157
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20157 pubmed: 15929087 pmcid: 6871666
Han, S., Song, Y., Ding, Y., Yund, E. W., & Woods, D. L. (2001). Neural substrates for visual perceptual grouping in humans. Psychophysiology, 38(6), 926–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3860926
doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3860926 pubmed: 12240669
Houpt, J., Blaha, L. M., McIntire, J. P., Havig, P. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2014). Systems factorial technology with R. Behavior Research Methods, 46(2), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0377-3
doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0377-3 pubmed: 24019062
Houpt, J., & Townsend, J. (2010). The statistical properties of the survivor interaction contrast. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 446–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.06.006
doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.06.006
Houpt, J., & Townsend, J. (2012). Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.05.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.05.004 pubmed: 23175582 pmcid: 3501136
Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. (2010). Parallel and serial grouping of image elements in visual perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1443–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020248
doi: 10.1037/a0020248 pubmed: 20731520
Huang, L. (2015). Grouping by similarity is mediated by feature selection: Evidence from the failure of cue combination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1364–1369. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0801-z
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0801-z
Huberle, E., & Karnath, H.-O. (2012). The role of temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) in global Gestalt perception. Brain Structure and Function, 217(3), 735–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-011-0369-y
doi: 10.1007/s00429-011-0369-y pubmed: 22193335
Kiesel, A., Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2007). Systematic biases and Type I error accumulation in tests of the race model inequality. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 539–51. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193024
doi: 10.3758/BF03193024 pubmed: 17958166
Kon, M., & Francis, G. (2022). Cortical circuits for top-down control of perceptual grouping. Neural Networks, 151, 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2022.03.029
doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.03.029 pubmed: 35439664
Kubovy, M., Holcombe, A. O., & Wagemans, J. (1998). On the Lawfulness of Grouping by Proximity. Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0673
doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0673 pubmed: 9520318
Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087759
doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139087759
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(4), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210951
doi: 10.3758/BF03210951
Luna, D., Villalba-García, C., Montoro, P. R., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2016). Dominance dynamics of competition between intrinsic and extrinsic grouping cues. Acta Psychologica, 170, 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.07.001
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.07.001 pubmed: 27423888
Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90010-X
doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90010-X pubmed: 7083803
Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2022). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. R package version 0.9.12-4.4. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bayesfactor/index.html
Palmer, S. E., Brooks, J. L., & Nelson, R. (2003). When does grouping happen? Acta Psychologica, 114(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.06.003
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.06.003 pubmed: 14670702
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., ...Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods,51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Pomerantz, J. R., & Garner, W. R. (1973). Stimules configuration in selective attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 14(3), 565–569. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211198
doi: 10.3758/BF03211198
Pomerantz, J. R., & Schwaitzberg, S. D. (1975). Grouping by proximity: Selective attention measures. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(5), 355–361. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211212
doi: 10.3758/BF03211212
Quinlan, P. T., & Wilton, R. N. (1998). Grouping by roximity or similarity? Competition between the Gestalt principles in vision. Perception, 27(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1068/p270417
doi: 10.1068/p270417 pubmed: 9797920
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/
Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24(5), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1962.tb01433.x
doi: 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1962.tb01433.x pubmed: 14489538
Rashal, E., Yeshurun, Y., & Kimchi, R. (2017). The time course of the competition between grouping organizations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000334
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000334 pubmed: 28240930
Razpurker-Apfeld, I., & Kimchi, R. (2007). The time course of perceptual grouping: The role of segregation and shape formation. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(5), 732–743. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193775
doi: 10.3758/BF03193775
Roelfsema, P. (2006). Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 203–27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112939
doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112939 pubmed: 16776584
Roelfsema, P., & Houtkamp, R. (2011). Incremental grouping of image elements in vision. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(8), 2542–72. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0200-0
doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0200-0
Sasaki, Y. (2007). Processing local signals into global patterns. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.003
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.003 pubmed: 17369036
Schmidt, F., & Schmidt, T. (2013). Grouping principles in direct competition. Vision Research, 88, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.06.002
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.06.002 pubmed: 23764184
Smith, P., & Little, D. (2018). Small is beautiful: In defense of the small-N design. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,25,. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1451-8
Stan Development Team. (2023). RStan: The R interface to Stan. R package version 2.21.8. Retrieved from https://mc-stan.org/
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
Townsend, J. T. (1971). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 10(3), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205778
doi: 10.3758/BF03205778
Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00067.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00067.x
Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39(4), 321–359. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1995.1033
doi: 10.1006/jmps.1995.1033
Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1997). Serial exhaustive models can violate the race model inequality: Implications for architecture and capacity. Psychological Review, 104(3), 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.3.595
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.3.595
Trick, L. M., & Enns, J. T. (1997). Clusters precede shapes in perceptual organization. Psychological Science, 8(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00694.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00694.x
Ulrich, R., Miller, J., & Schröter, H. (2007). Testing the race model inequality: An algorithm and computer programs. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193160
doi: 10.3758/BF03193160 pubmed: 17695357
Villalba-García, C., Santaniello, G., Luna, D., Montoro, P., & Hinojosa, J. (2018). Temporal brain dynamics of the competition between proximity and shape similarity grouping cues in vision. Neuropsychologia, 121, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.022
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.022 pubmed: 30391569
Vorberg, D., & Ulrich, R. (1987). Random search with unequal search rates: Serial and parallel generalizations of McGill’s model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 31(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(87)90033-2
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029333
doi: 10.1037/a0029333 pubmed: 22845751 pmcid: 3482144
Wannig, A., Stanisor, L., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Automatic spread of attentional response modulation along Gestalt criteria in primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 14(10), 1243–1244. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2910
doi: 10.1038/nn.2910 pubmed: 21926984
Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2000). Basic response time tools for studying general processing capacity in attention, perception, and cognition. The Journal of General Psychology, 127(1), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300009598571
doi: 10.1080/00221300009598571 pubmed: 10695952
Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Psychologische Forschung, 4(3), 301–350. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193160
doi: 10.3758/BF03193160
Yu, D., Xiao, X., Bemis, D., & Franconeri, S. (2019). Similarity grouping as feature-based selection. Psychological Science, 30(3), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618822798
doi: 10.1177/0956797618822798 pubmed: 30699047
Zucker, S. W., Stevens, K. A., & Sander, P. (1983). The relation between proximity and brightness similarity in dot patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 34(6), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205904

Auteurs

Robert C G Johansson (RCG)

Fachbereich Psychologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. johansson@psycho.uni-tuebingen.de.

Rolf Ulrich (R)

Fachbereich Psychologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH