Comparison of amino acid release between enzymatic hydrolysis and acid autolysis of rainbow trout viscera.
Endogenous enzymes
Fish protein hydrolysates
Fish viscera
Free amino acids
Silage
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Mar 2024
15 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
01
09
2023
revised:
22
02
2024
accepted:
22
02
2024
medline:
12
3
2024
pubmed:
12
3
2024
entrez:
12
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fish protein hydrolysates were obtained from cultured rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) viscera using commercial and endogenous enzymes. Two methods were employed for hydrolysis: acid autolysis (also known as silage) at room temperature for 10 days in acidic conditions, until total solubilisation, and enzymatic hydrolysis using Alcalase 2.4 LFG, Protana Prime, and the endogenous enzymes in the viscera. The effectiveness of both methods in releasing free amino acids (FAA) was assessed. After evaluating the results, the most effective enzymatic hydrolysis was optimized. The findings indicated that enzymatic hydrolysis with Alcalase, Protana Prime and endogenous enzymes combined for 7 h at a dose of 1% of protein, and a 7-day acid autolysis yielded the highest degree of hydrolysis (83.8% and 75.8%), a yield of FAA from viscera of 5.9% and 3.2%, and a yield of FAA from total protein of 71.3% and 52.5%, respectively. In conclusion, the use of commercial enzymes was more efficient in releasing amino acids, but endogenous enzymes showed a strong proteolytic capacity during acid autolysis, suggesting it also as a promising method to produce FAA-rich hydrolysates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38468971
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27030
pii: S2405-8440(24)03061-5
pmc: PMC10926076
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e27030Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.