What works for whom, how and why in mental health education for undergraduate health profession students? A realist synthesis protocol.

EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training) Health Education MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING MENTAL HEALTH

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 13 3 2024
pubmed: 13 3 2024
entrez: 12 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

It has been shown that mental health education can support positive attitudes of health profession students towards people with mental health challenges, which supports them to provide optimal healthcare to this group. There are many different approaches to designing and delivering mental health education to health profession students. Each has their own advantages and disadvantages, and often mental health education programmes incorporate a multimodal approach in order to reap the benefits of a variety of teaching and learning approaches. The aim of this study is to understand the current landscape of teaching and learning approaches to mental health education for undergraduate health profession students. We will examine the features of successful outcomes for health profession students for:Learning environment.Knowledge development and retention.Confidence. Preparedness for professional practice. For this, a realist synthesis has been chosen in order to review the literature. Realist synthesis lends itself to the review of complex interventions such as mental health education for undergraduate health profession curricula because it seeks to uncover the range of different mechanisms and context configurations that produce different outcomes. Health profession education and education practice, in general, is complex. A patient and public involvement (PPI) group is involved throughout this study and includes undergraduate health profession students, and members of the St John of Gods Hospital Consumers and Carers Council who are involved at every stage of the research. This study will engage with a stakeholder group who will support the refining of the programme theory. Ethical approval has been sought and approved by Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland Ethical Committee (REC number: 212622783). We will aim to write up and publish the full synthesis as a journal article. We will also discuss ways of dissemination outside of academia with our PPI group.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38471690
pii: bmjopen-2023-078130
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078130
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e078130

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Zoe McCormack (Z)

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland zoemccormack22@rcsi.com.

Aisling Kerr (A)

School of Pharmacy Practice, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.

Andrew Simpson (A)

Library Services, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Dolores Keating (D)

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Pharmacy Department, Saint John of God Hospitaller Services, Dublin, Ireland.

Judith Strawbridge (J)

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Classifications MeSH