External validation of a deep learning model for predicting bone mineral density on chest radiographs.
Bone analysis/quantitation
Bone disorders
Bone mineral density
Chest radiography
Osteoporosis
Screening
Journal
Archives of osteoporosis
ISSN: 1862-3514
Titre abrégé: Arch Osteoporos
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101318988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Mar 2024
13 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
26
08
2023
accepted:
27
02
2024
medline:
13
3
2024
pubmed:
13
3
2024
entrez:
13
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We developed a new model for predicting bone mineral density on chest radiographs and externally validated it using images captured at facilities other than the development environment. The model performed well and showed potential for clinical use. In this study, we performed external validation (EV) of a developed deep learning model for predicting bone mineral density (BMD) of femoral neck on chest radiographs to verify the usefulness of this model in clinical practice. This study included patients who visited any of the collaborating facilities from 2010 to 2020 and underwent chest radiography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the femoral neck in the year before and after their visit. A total of 50,114 chest radiographs were obtained, and BMD was measured using DXA. We developed the model with 47,150 images from 17 facilities and performed EV with 2914 images from three other facilities (EV dataset). We trained the deep learning model via ensemble learning based on chest radiographs, age, and sex to predict BMD using regression. The outcomes were the correlation of the predicted BMD and measured BMD with diagnoses of osteoporosis and osteopenia using the T-score estimated from the predicted BMD. The mean BMD was 0.64±0.14 g/cm Our model, which was externally validated using data obtained at facilities other than the development environment, predicted BMD of femoral neck on chest radiographs. The model performed well and showed potential for clinical use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38472499
doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01372-9
pii: 10.1007/s11657-024-01372-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15Informations de copyright
© 2024. International Osteoporosis Foundation and Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation.
Références
Salari N, Ghasemi H, Mohammadi L, Behzadi MH, Rabieenia E, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M (2021) The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 16:609. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02772-0
doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02772-0
pubmed: 34657598
pmcid: 8522202
Wade SW, Strader C, Fitzpatrick LA, Anthony MS, O'Malley CD (2014) Estimating prevalence of osteoporosis: examples from industrialized countries. Arch Osteoporos 9:182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-014-0182-3
doi: 10.1007/s11657-014-0182-3
pubmed: 24847682
Barrett-Connor E (1995) The economic and human costs of osteoporotic fracture. Am J Med 98:3S–8S. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(05)80037-3
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(05)80037-3
pubmed: 7709931
Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.061113
doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061113
pubmed: 17144789
Johnell O (1997) The socioeconomic burden of fractures: today and in the 21st century. Am J Med 103:20S–25S; discussion 25S-26S. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(97)90023-1
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)90023-1
pubmed: 9302894
Rachner TD, Khosla S, Hofbauer LC (2011) Osteoporosis: now and the future. Lancet 377:1276–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62349-5
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62349-5
pubmed: 21450337
pmcid: 3555696
World Health Organization (2023) WHO criteria for diagnosis of osteoporosis. 4BoneHealth. http://www.4bonehealth.org/education/world-health-organization-criteria-diagnosis-osteoporosis/2023.5.8 . Accessed 10 Aug 2023
Bolotin HH, Sievänen H (2001) Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral density can seriously mislead diagnostic/prognostic interpretations of patient-specific bone fragility. J Bone Miner Res 16:799–805. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.5.799
doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.5.799
pubmed: 11341324
Mueller D, Gandjour A (2009) Cost-effectiveness of using clinical risk factors with and without DXA for osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women. Value Health 12:1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00577.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00577.x
pubmed: 19706151
Jang M, Kim M, Bae SJ, Lee SH, Koh JM, Kim N (2022) Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using chest radiographs with deep learning: development and external validation with a cohort dataset. J Bone Miner Res 37:369–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4477
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4477
pubmed: 34812546
Yamamoto N, Sukegawa S, Kitamura A, Goto R, Noda T, Nakano K, Takabatake K, Kawai H, Nagatsuka H, Kawasaki K, Furuki Y, Ozaki T (2020) Deep learning for osteoporosis classification using hip radiographs and patient clinical covariates. Biomolecules 10:1534. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111534
doi: 10.3390/biom10111534
pubmed: 33182778
pmcid: 7697189
Widyaningrum R, Sela EI, Pulungan R, Septiarini A (2023) Automatic segmentation of periapical radiograph using color histogram and machine learning for osteoporosis detection. Int J Dent 2023:6662911. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6662911
doi: 10.1155/2023/6662911
pubmed: 36896411
pmcid: 9991474
Zhang B, Yu K, Ning Z, Wang K, Dong Y, Liu X, Liu S, Wang J, Zhu C, Yu Q, Duan Y, Lv S, Zhang X, Chen Y, Wang X, Shen J, Peng J, Chen Q, Zhang Y et al (2021) Corrigendum to “Deep learning of lumbar spine X-ray for osteopenia and osteoporosis screening: a multicenter retrospective cohort study” [Bone 140, November 2020, 115561]. Bone 153:116143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2021.116143
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116143
pubmed: 34384739
Wang F, Zheng K, Lu L, Xiao J, Wu M, Kuo CF, Miao S (2023) Lumbar bone mineral density estimation from chest X-ray images: anatomy-aware attentive multi-ROI modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 42:257–267. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2022.3209648
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3209648
pubmed: 36155432
Hsieh CI, Zheng K, Lin C, Mei L, Lu L, Li W, Chen FP, Wang Y, Zhou X, Wang F, Xie G, Xiao J, Miao S, Kuo CF (2021) Automated bone mineral density prediction and fracture risk assessment using plain radiographs via deep learning. Nat Commun 12:5472. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25779-x
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25779-x
pubmed: 34531406
pmcid: 8446034
Sato Y, Yamamoto N, Inagaki N, Iesaki Y, Asamoto T, Suzuki T, Takahara S (2022) Deep learning for bone mineral density and T-score prediction from chest X-rays: a multicenter study. Biomedicines 10:2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092323
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092323
pubmed: 36140424
pmcid: 9496220
Adams M, Chen W, Holcdorf D, McCusker MW, Howe PD, Gaillard F (2019) Computer vs human: deep learning versus perceptual training for the detection of neck of femur fractures. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 63:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12828
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12828
pubmed: 30407743
Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KG (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ 338:b605. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b605
doi: 10.1136/bmj.b605
pubmed: 19477892
Chlap P, Min H, Vandenberg N, Dowling J et al (2021) A review of medical image data augmentation techniques for deep learning applications. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 65(5):545–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13261 Epub 2021 Jun 19
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13261
pubmed: 34145766
Tank VH, Ghosh R, Gupta V, Sheth N, Gordon S, He W, Modica SF, Prestigiacomo CJ, Gandhi CD (2016) Drug eluting stents versus bare metal stents for the treatment of extracranial vertebral artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 8:770–774. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011697
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011697
pubmed: 26180094
Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244
doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244
pubmed: 23208313
Mounach A, Abayi DA, Ghazi M et al (2009) Discordance between hip and spine bone mineral density measurement using DXA: prevalence and risk factors. Semin Arthritis Rheum 38(6):467–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.04.001 Epub 2008 Jun 24
doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.04.001
pubmed: 18571696
Lips P, van Schoor NM (2005) Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 16:447–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1762-7)
doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1762-7)
pubmed: 15609073
Lorentzon M (2019) Treating osteoporosis to prevent fractures: current concepts and future developments. J Intern Med 285(4):381–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12873 . Epub 2019 Jan 18 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652796
doi: 10.1111/joim.12873
pubmed: 30657216
Ramspek CL, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, van Diepen M (2021) External validation of prognostic models: what, why, how, when and where. Clin Kidney J 14:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa188
doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa188
pubmed: 33564405
Collins GS, Moons KGM (2019) Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models. Lancet 393:1577–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30037-6
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30037-6
pubmed: 31007185
Snell KIE, Archer L, Ensor J, Bonnett LJ, Debray TPA, Phillips B, Collins GS, Riley RD (2021) External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb. J Clin Epidemiol 135:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.011
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.011
pubmed: 33596458
pmcid: 8352630
Mukaka MM (2012) Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 24:69–71
pubmed: 23638278
pmcid: 3576830
Cetin A, Ertürk H, Celiker R et al (2001) The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray bsorptiometry. Rheumatol Int 20(2):55–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00006857
doi: 10.1007/pl00006857
pubmed: 11269533
Clowes JA, Peel NFA, Eastell R (2006) Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 17:1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0122-1
doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0122-1
pubmed: 16810454
Gemalmaz A, Discigil G, Sensoy N et al (2007) Identifying osteoporosis in a primary care setting with quantitative ultrasound: relationship to anthropometric and lifestyle factors. J Bone Miner Metab 25(3):184–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-006-0741-9 Epub 2007 Apr 20
doi: 10.1007/s00774-006-0741-9
pubmed: 17447117
Trimpou P, Bosaeus I, Bengtsson BA et al (2010) High correlation between quantitative ultrasound and DXA during 7 years of follow-up. Eur J Radiol 73(2):360–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.024 Epub 2009 Jan 8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X08006554
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.024
pubmed: 19135327
Oral A, Esmaeilzadeh S, Yalıman A et al (2019) The ability of calcaneal and multisite quantitative ultrasound variables in the identification of osteoporosis in women and men. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 65(3):203–215. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2019.1894 PMID: 31663068; PMCID: PMC6797920. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797920/
doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2019.1894
pubmed: 31663068
pmcid: 6797920
Chanprasertpinyo W, Punsawad C, Khwanchuea R et al (2023) Comparison between calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and the gold standard DXA in the ability to detect osteoporosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. J Orthop Surg Res 18(1):778. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04211-8 Erratum in: J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Nov 15; 18(1):868. PMID: 37845656; PMCID: PMC10577968
doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04211-8
pubmed: 37845656
pmcid: 10577968
Jones T, Davie MW (1998) Bone mineral density at distal forearm can identify patients with osteoporosis at spine or femoral neck. Br J Rheumatol 37(5):539–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/37.5.539 https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article/37/5/539/1783093?login=true
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.5.539
pubmed: 9651082
Azami A, Anari H, Iranparvar M et al (2019) Comparison of bone mineral densitometry at 2 sites versus 3 sites in patients suspicious for osteoporosis. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord:12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179544119849017
Yue C, Ding N, Xu LL et al (2022) Prescreening for osteoporosis with forearm bone densitometry in health examination population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23(1):377. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05325-6 PMID: 35459140; PMCID: PMC9027342
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05325-6
pubmed: 35459140
pmcid: 9027342
Adami S, Zamberlan N, Gatti D et al (1996) Computed radiographic absorptiometry and morphometry in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss. Osteoporos Int 6(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626531
doi: 10.1007/BF01626531
pubmed: 8845604
Dey A, McCloskey EV, Taube T et al (2000) Metacarpal morphometry using a semi-automated technique in the assessment of osteoporosis and vertebral fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 11(11):953–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980070034.B4:B32 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s001980070034
doi: 10.1007/s001980070034.B4:B32
pubmed: 11193248
Hyldstrup L, Nielsen SP (2001) Metacarpal index by digital X-ray radiogrammetry: normative reference values and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 4(4):299–306. https://doi.org/10.1385/jcd:4:4:299 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695006603624
doi: 10.1385/jcd:4:4:299
pubmed: 11748334
Rosholm A, Hyldstrup L, Backsgaard L et al (2001) Estimation of bone mineral density by digital X-ray radiogrammetry: theoretical background and clinical testing. Osteoporos Int 12(11):961–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980170026
doi: 10.1007/s001980170026
pubmed: 11804024
Boonen S, Nijs J, Borghs H et al (2005) Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study. Osteoporos Int 16(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1660-z Epub 2004 Jun 10
doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1660-z
pubmed: 15197540
Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C (1998) Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Manag Care 4:37–48
pubmed: 10179905
Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Kreiger N, McIsaac WJ, Darlington GA, Tu JV (2000) Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. CMAJ 162:1289–1294
pubmed: 10813010
pmcid: 1232411
Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM, McIsaac WJ, Joseph L, Brown JP (2001) Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. JAMA 286:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.1.57
doi: 10.1001/jama.286.1.57
pubmed: 11434827