Surrogate Biomarker Prediction from Whole-Slide Images for Evaluating Overall Survival in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

biomarkers computational pathology deep learning lung adenocarcinoma survival

Journal

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 23 01 2024
revised: 14 02 2024
accepted: 16 02 2024
medline: 13 3 2024
pubmed: 13 3 2024
entrez: 13 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recent advances in computational pathology have shown potential in predicting biomarkers from haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole-slide images (WSI). However, predicting the outcome directly from WSIs remains a substantial challenge. In this study, we aimed to investigate how gene expression, predicted from WSIs, could be used to evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUAD cohort. Cox regression analysis was performed on DEGs to identify the gene prognostics of OS. Attention-based multiple instance learning (AMIL) models were trained to predict the expression of identified prognostic genes from WSIs using the TCGA-LUAD dataset. Models were externally validated in the Clinical Proteomic Tumour Analysis Consortium (CPTAC)-LUAD dataset. The prognostic value of predicted gene expression values was then compared to the true gene expression measurements. The expression of 239 prognostic genes could be predicted in TCGA-LUAD with cross-validated Pearson's R > 0.4. Predicted gene expression demonstrated prognostic performance, attaining a cross-validated concordance index of up to 0.615 in TCGA-LUAD through Cox regression. In total, 36 genes had predicted expression in the external validation cohort that was prognostic of OS. Gene expression predicted from WSIs is an effective method of evaluating OS in patients with LUAD. These results may open up new avenues of cost- and time-efficient prognosis assessment in LUAD treatment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Recent advances in computational pathology have shown potential in predicting biomarkers from haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole-slide images (WSI). However, predicting the outcome directly from WSIs remains a substantial challenge. In this study, we aimed to investigate how gene expression, predicted from WSIs, could be used to evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).
METHODS METHODS
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUAD cohort. Cox regression analysis was performed on DEGs to identify the gene prognostics of OS. Attention-based multiple instance learning (AMIL) models were trained to predict the expression of identified prognostic genes from WSIs using the TCGA-LUAD dataset. Models were externally validated in the Clinical Proteomic Tumour Analysis Consortium (CPTAC)-LUAD dataset. The prognostic value of predicted gene expression values was then compared to the true gene expression measurements.
RESULTS RESULTS
The expression of 239 prognostic genes could be predicted in TCGA-LUAD with cross-validated Pearson's R > 0.4. Predicted gene expression demonstrated prognostic performance, attaining a cross-validated concordance index of up to 0.615 in TCGA-LUAD through Cox regression. In total, 36 genes had predicted expression in the external validation cohort that was prognostic of OS.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Gene expression predicted from WSIs is an effective method of evaluating OS in patients with LUAD. These results may open up new avenues of cost- and time-efficient prognosis assessment in LUAD treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38472935
pii: diagnostics14050462
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050462
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Science Foundation Ireland
ID : 18/CRT/6214.
Pays : Ireland

Auteurs

Pierre Murchan (P)

Department of Histopathology and Morbid Anatomy, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, D08 W9RT Dublin, Ireland.
The SFI Centre for Research Training in Genomics Data Science, University of Galway, H91 CF50 Galway, Ireland.
Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute (TSJCI), St. James's Hospital, D08 RX0X Dublin, Ireland.

Anne-Marie Baird (AM)

Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute (TSJCI), St. James's Hospital, D08 RX0X Dublin, Ireland.
School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, D02 A440 Dublin, Ireland.

Pilib Ó Broin (P)

School of Mathematical & Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.

Orla Sheils (O)

Department of Histopathology and Morbid Anatomy, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, D08 W9RT Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute (TSJCI), St. James's Hospital, D08 RX0X Dublin, Ireland.

Stephen P Finn (SP)

Department of Histopathology and Morbid Anatomy, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, D08 W9RT Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute (TSJCI), St. James's Hospital, D08 RX0X Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Histopathology, St. James's Hospital, James's Street, D08 X4RX Dublin, Ireland.

Classifications MeSH