The Effect of Die Material on the Crown Fracture Strength of Zirconia Crowns.

3D printing crown fracture zirconia

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 24 01 2024
revised: 16 02 2024
accepted: 26 02 2024
medline: 13 3 2024
pubmed: 13 3 2024
entrez: 13 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Determination of the eligibility of several tooth analog materials for use in crown fracture testing. A standardized premolar crown preparation was replicated into three types of resin dies (C&B, low modulus 3D printed resin; OnX, high modulus 3D printed resin composite; and highest modulus milled resin composite). 0.8 mm zirconia crowns were bonded to the dies and the maximum fracture load of the crowns was tested. Twelve extracted human premolars were prepared to a standardized crown preparation, and duplicate dies of the prepared teeth were 3D printed out of C&B. Zirconia crowns were bonded to both the dies and natural teeth, and their fracture load was tested. There was no statistical difference between the fracture load of zirconia crowns bonded to standardized dies of C&B (1084.5 ± 134.2 N), OnX (1112.7 ± 109.8 N) or Lava Ultimate (1137.5 ± 88.7 N) ( There was no difference in the static fracture load of zirconia crowns bonded to standardized resin dies with different moduli or between a low modulus resin die and natural dentin die.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Determination of the eligibility of several tooth analog materials for use in crown fracture testing.
METHODS METHODS
A standardized premolar crown preparation was replicated into three types of resin dies (C&B, low modulus 3D printed resin; OnX, high modulus 3D printed resin composite; and highest modulus milled resin composite). 0.8 mm zirconia crowns were bonded to the dies and the maximum fracture load of the crowns was tested. Twelve extracted human premolars were prepared to a standardized crown preparation, and duplicate dies of the prepared teeth were 3D printed out of C&B. Zirconia crowns were bonded to both the dies and natural teeth, and their fracture load was tested.
RESULTS RESULTS
There was no statistical difference between the fracture load of zirconia crowns bonded to standardized dies of C&B (1084.5 ± 134.2 N), OnX (1112.7 ± 109.8 N) or Lava Ultimate (1137.5 ± 88.7 N) (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
There was no difference in the static fracture load of zirconia crowns bonded to standardized resin dies with different moduli or between a low modulus resin die and natural dentin die.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38473568
pii: ma17051096
doi: 10.3390/ma17051096
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Akram Sayed Ahmed (A)

Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta 6624033, Egypt.
Division of Biomaterials, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA.

Nathaniel C Lawson (NC)

Division of Biomaterials, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA.

Chin-Chuan Fu (CC)

Division of Prosthodontics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA.

Pranit V Bora (PV)

Division of Biomaterials, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA.

Edwin Kee (E)

Division of Prosthodontics, LSU School of Dentistry, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA.

Amir H Nejat (AH)

Division of Prosthodontics, LSU School of Dentistry, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA.

Classifications MeSH