A sustainable bioprocess to produce bacterial cellulose (BC) using waste streams from wine distilleries and the biodiesel industry: evaluation of BC for adsorption of phenolic compounds, dyes and metals.
BC-based adsorbent
Dephenolization
Heavy metals
Low-cost feedstock
Wastewater treatment
Wine industry
Journal
Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts
ISSN: 2731-3654
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918300888906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Mar 2024
12 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
17
01
2024
accepted:
04
03
2024
medline:
13
3
2024
pubmed:
13
3
2024
entrez:
13
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The main challenge for large-scale production of bacterial cellulose (BC) includes high production costs interlinked with raw materials, and low production rates. The valorization of renewable nutrient sources could improve the economic effectiveness of BC fermentation while their direct bioconversion into sustainable biopolymers addresses environmental pollution and/or resource depletion challenges. Herein a green bioprocess was developed to produce BC in high amounts with the rather unexplored bacterial strain Komagataeibacter rhaeticus, using waste streams such as wine distillery effluents (WDE) and biodiesel-derived glycerol. Also, BC was evaluated as a bio-adsorbent for phenolics, dyes and metals removal to enlarge its market diversification. BC production was significantly affected by the WDE mixing ratio (0-100%), glycerol concentration (20-45 g/L), type of glycerol and media-sterilization method. A maximum BC concentration of 9.0 g/L, with a productivity of 0.90 g/L/day and a water holding capacity of 60.1 g water/g dry BC, was achieved at 100% WDE and ≈30 g/L crude glycerol. BC samples showed typical cellulose vibration bands and average fiber diameters between 37.2 and 89.6 nm. The BC capacity to dephenolize WDE and adsorb phenolics during fermentation reached respectively, up to 50.7% and 26.96 mg gallic acid equivalents/g dry BC (in-situ process). The produced BC was also investigated for dye and metal removal. The highest removal of dye acid yellow 17 (54.3%) was recorded when 5% of BC was applied as the bio-adsorbent. Experiments performed in a multi-metal synthetic wastewater showed that BC could remove up to 96% of Zn and 97% of Cd. This work demonstrated a low-carbon approach to produce low-cost, green and biodegradable BC-based bio-adsorbents, without any chemical modification. Their potential in wastewater-treatment-applications was highlighted, promoting closed-loop systems within the circular economy era. This study may serve as an orientation for future research towards competitive or targeted adsorption technologies for wastewater treatment or resources recovery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The main challenge for large-scale production of bacterial cellulose (BC) includes high production costs interlinked with raw materials, and low production rates. The valorization of renewable nutrient sources could improve the economic effectiveness of BC fermentation while their direct bioconversion into sustainable biopolymers addresses environmental pollution and/or resource depletion challenges. Herein a green bioprocess was developed to produce BC in high amounts with the rather unexplored bacterial strain Komagataeibacter rhaeticus, using waste streams such as wine distillery effluents (WDE) and biodiesel-derived glycerol. Also, BC was evaluated as a bio-adsorbent for phenolics, dyes and metals removal to enlarge its market diversification.
RESULTS
RESULTS
BC production was significantly affected by the WDE mixing ratio (0-100%), glycerol concentration (20-45 g/L), type of glycerol and media-sterilization method. A maximum BC concentration of 9.0 g/L, with a productivity of 0.90 g/L/day and a water holding capacity of 60.1 g water/g dry BC, was achieved at 100% WDE and ≈30 g/L crude glycerol. BC samples showed typical cellulose vibration bands and average fiber diameters between 37.2 and 89.6 nm. The BC capacity to dephenolize WDE and adsorb phenolics during fermentation reached respectively, up to 50.7% and 26.96 mg gallic acid equivalents/g dry BC (in-situ process). The produced BC was also investigated for dye and metal removal. The highest removal of dye acid yellow 17 (54.3%) was recorded when 5% of BC was applied as the bio-adsorbent. Experiments performed in a multi-metal synthetic wastewater showed that BC could remove up to 96% of Zn and 97% of Cd.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This work demonstrated a low-carbon approach to produce low-cost, green and biodegradable BC-based bio-adsorbents, without any chemical modification. Their potential in wastewater-treatment-applications was highlighted, promoting closed-loop systems within the circular economy era. This study may serve as an orientation for future research towards competitive or targeted adsorption technologies for wastewater treatment or resources recovery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38475851
doi: 10.1186/s13068-024-02488-3
pii: 10.1186/s13068-024-02488-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
40Subventions
Organisme : Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (H.F.R.I)
ID : 7664
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Skiba EA, Budaeva VV, Ovchinnikova EV, Gladysheva EK, Kashcheyeva EI, Pavlov IN, et al. A technology for pilot production of bacterial cellulose from oat hulls. Chem Eng J. 2020;383:123128.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123128
Ratna S, Rastogi S, Kumar R. Current trends for distillery wastewater management and its emerging applications for sustainable environment. J Environ Manage. 2021;290:112544.
pubmed: 33862317
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112544
Tena M, Luque B, Perez M, Solera R. Enhanced hydrogen production from sewage sludge by cofermentation with wine vinasse. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2020;45(32):15977–84.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.075
Javier Benitez F, Real FJ, Acero JL, Garcia J, Sanchez M. Kinetics of the ozonation and aerobic biodegradation of wine vinasses in discontinuous and continuous processes. J Hazard Mater. 2003;101(2):203–18.
pubmed: 12927736
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00175-4
Devesa-Rey R, Vecino X, Varela-Alende JL, Barral MT, Cruz JM, Moldes AB. Valorization of winery waste vs. the costs of not recycling. Waste Manag. 2011;31(11):2327–35.
pubmed: 21752623
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.06.001
Zhao M, Wang Y, Zhou W, Zhou W, Gong Z. Co-valorization of crude glycerol and low-cost substrates via oleaginous yeasts to micro-biodiesel: status and outlook. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2023;180:113303.
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113303
Zhong C, Zhang GC, Liu M, Zheng XT, Han PP, Jia SR. Metabolic flux analysis of Gluconacetobacter xylinus for bacterial cellulose production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(14):6189–99.
pubmed: 23640364
doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-4908-8
Sahari NS, Shahir S, Ibrahim Z, Hasmoni SH, Altowayti WAH. Bacterial nanocellulose and its application in heavy metals and dyes removal: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30067-w .
doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30067-w
Le HV, Dao NT, Bui HT, Le Kim PT, Le KA, Tuong Tran AT, et al. Bacterial cellulose aerogels derived from pineapple peel waste for the adsorption of dyes. ACS Omega. 2023;8(37):33412–25.
pubmed: 37744831
pmcid: 10515182
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03130
Hu Y, Liu F, Sun Y, Xu X, Chen X, Pan B, et al. Bacterial cellulose derived paper-like purifier with multifunctionality for water decontamination. Chem Eng J. 2019;371:730–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.091
Bhatt P, Joshi S, Urper Bayram GM, Khati P, Simsek H. Developments and application of chitosan-based adsorbents for wastewater treatments. Environ Res. 2023;226:115530.
pubmed: 36863653
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115530
Efthymiou MN, Tsouko E, Vlassi E, Papagiannopoulos A, Koutinas A, Pispas S. Bio-based and nanostructured hybrids for green and active food packaging. In: Shukla AK, editor. Bio- and nano-sensing technologies for food processing and packaging. London: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2022. p. 81–128.
doi: 10.1039/9781839167966-00081
Tseng YS, Singhania RR, Cheng AC, Chen CW, Dong CD, Patel AK. Removal of heavy metal vanadium from aqueous solution by nanocellulose produced from Komagataeibacter europaeus employing pineapple waste as carbon source. Bioresour Technol. 2023;369:128411.
pubmed: 36460177
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128411
Alves AA, Silva WE, Belian MF, Lins LSG, Galembeck A. Bacterial cellulose membranes for environmental water remediation and industrial wastewater treatment. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2020;17(9):3997–4008.
doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-02746-5
Zhou J, Sun J, Ullah M, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Cao G, et al. Polyethylene terephthalate hydrolysate increased bacterial cellulose production. Carbohydr Polym. 2023;300:120301.
pubmed: 36372499
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120301
Singhania RR, Patel AK, Tsai ML, Chen CW, Di Dong C. Genetic modification for enhancing bacterial cellulose production and its applications. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):6793–807.
pubmed: 34519629
pmcid: 8806912
doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1968989
Manan S, Ullah MW, Ul-Islam M, Shi Z, Gauthier M, Yang G. Bacterial cellulose: molecular regulation of biosynthesis, supramolecular assembly, and tailored structural and functional properties. Prog Mater Sci. 2022;129:100972.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100972
Tsouko E, Pilafidis S, Dimopoulou M, Kourmentza K, Sarris D. Bioconversion of underutilized brewing by-products into bacterial cellulose by a newly isolated Komagataeibacter rhaeticus strain: a preliminary evaluation of the bioprocess environmental impact. Bioresour Technol. 2023;387:129667.
pubmed: 37572886
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129667
Tsouko E, Papadaki A, Papapostolou H, Ladakis D, Natsia A, Koutinas A, et al. Valorization of Zante currant side-streams for the production of phenolic-rich extract and bacterial cellulose: a novel biorefinery concept. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2020;95(2):427–38.
doi: 10.1002/jctb.6035
Efthymiou MN, Tsouko E, Pateraki C, Papagiannopoulos A, Tzamalis P, Pispas S, et al. Property evaluation of bacterial cellulose nanostructures produced from confectionery wastes. Biochem Eng J. 2022;186:108575.
doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2022.108575
Liu D, Martinez-Sanz M, Lopez-Sanchez P, Gilbert EP, Gidley MJ. Adsorption behaviour of polyphenols on cellulose is affected by processing history. Food Hydrocoll. 2017;63:496–507.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.012
Tsouko E, Papadaki A, Papapostolou H, Ladakis D, Natsia A, Koutinas A, et al. Valorization of Zante currant side-streams for the production of phenolic-rich extract and bacterial cellulose: a novel biorefinery concept. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2020;95(2):427–38.
doi: 10.1002/jctb.6035
Pilafidis S, Diamantopoulou P, Gkatzionis K, Sarris D. Valorization of agro-industrial wastes and residues through the production of bioactive compounds by macrofungi in liquid state cultures: growing circular economy. Appl Sci. 2022;12(22):11426.
doi: 10.3390/app122211426
Vardaxi A, Pispas S. Random cationic copolymers as nanocarriers for ovalbumin. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2023;80:104177.
doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104177
Armylisas AHN, Hoong SS, Tuan Ismail TNM. Characterization of crude glycerol and glycerol pitch from palm-based residual biomass. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04003-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s13399-023-04003-4
Contreras-Andrade I, Avella-Moreno E, Sierra-Cantor JF, Guerrero-Fajardo CA, Sodré JR. Purification of glycerol from biodiesel production by sequential extraction monitored by 1H NMR. Fuel Process Technol. 2015;132:99–104.
doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.12.016
Yang Y, Lee T, Kim JR, Choi YE, Park C. Improved production of bacterial cellulose from waste glycerol through investigation of inhibitory effects of crude glycerol-derived compounds by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Ind Eng Chem. 2019;75:158–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.03.017
Sillero L, Solera R, Pérez M. Effect of the hydraulic retention time on the acidogenic fermentation of sewage sludge, wine vinasse and poultry manure for biohydrogen production. Biomass Bioenergy. 2022;167:106643.
doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106643
Vecino X, Reig M, Gibert O, Valderrama C, Cortina JL. Integration of monopolar and bipolar electrodialysis processes for tartaric acid recovery from residues of the winery industry. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8(35):13387–99.
doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c04166
Petta L, De Gisi S, Casella P, Farina R, Notarnicola M. Evaluation of the treatability of a winery distillery (vinasse) wastewater by UASB, anoxic-aerobic UF-MBR and chemical precipitation/adsorption. J Environ Manage. 2017;201:177–89.
pubmed: 28662422
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.042
Salgado JM, Carballo EM, Max B, Domínguez JM. Characterization of vinasses from five certified brands of origin (CBO) and use as economic nutrient for the xylitol production by Debaryomyces hansenii. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(7):2379–88.
pubmed: 20005093
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.015
Doelsch E, Masion A, Cazevieille P, Condom N. Spectroscopic characterization of organic matter of a soil and vinasse mixture during aerobic or anaerobic incubation. Waste Manag. 2009;29(6):1929–35.
pubmed: 19157830
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.12.009
Vasconcelos NF, Feitosa JPA, da Gama FMP, Morais JPS, Andrade FK, de Souza Filho MSM, et al. Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals produced under different hydrolysis conditions: Properties and morphological features. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;155:425–31.
pubmed: 27702531
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.090
Bettani SR, de Oliveira RG, Leal Santos N, Kieckbusch TG, Gaspar Bastos R, Soares MR, et al. Sugarcane vinasse and microalgal biomass in the production of pectin particles as an alternative soil fertilizer. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;203:322–30.
pubmed: 30318219
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.041
Wang X, Zhong JJ. Improvement of bacterial cellulose fermentation by metabolic perturbation with mixed carbon sources. Process Biochem. 2022;122:95–102.
doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2022.08.022
Keshk S, Sameshima K. The utilization of sugar cane molasses with/without the presence of lignosulfonate for the production of bacterial cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;72(2):291–6.
pubmed: 16450110
doi: 10.1007/s00253-005-0265-6
Heydorn RL, Lammers D, Gottschling M, Dohnt K. Effect of food industry by-products on bacterial cellulose production and its structural properties. Cellulose. 2023;30(7):4159–79.
doi: 10.1007/s10570-023-05097-9
Filippi K, Papapostolou H, Alexandri M, Vlysidis A, Myrtsi ED, Ladakis D, et al. Integrated biorefinery development using winery waste streams for the production of bacterial cellulose, succinic acid and value-added fractions. Bioresour Technol. 2022;343:125989.
pubmed: 34695693
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125989
Cazón P, Puertas G, Vázquez M. Production and characterization of active bacterial cellulose films obtained from the fermentation of wine bagasse and discarded potatoes by Komagateibacter xylinus. Polymers. 2022;14(23):5194.
pubmed: 36501589
pmcid: 9737754
doi: 10.3390/polym14235194
Barshan S, Rezazadeh-Bari M, Almasi H, Amiri S. Optimization and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Komagatacibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 using vinasse as a cheap cultivation medium. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;136:1188–95.
pubmed: 31252013
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.192
Gayathri G, Srinikethan G. Bacterial Cellulose production by K. saccharivorans BC1 strain using crude distillery effluent as cheap and cost effective nutrient medium. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;138:950–7.
pubmed: 31351957
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.159
Dikshit PK, Kim BS. Bacterial cellulose production from biodiesel–derived crude glycerol, magnetic functionalization, and its application as carrier for lipase immobilization. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;153:902–11.
pubmed: 32165199
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.047
Obruca S, Sedlacek P, Koller M. The underexplored role of diverse stress factors in microbial biopolymer synthesis. Bioresour Technol. 2021;326:124767.
pubmed: 33540213
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124767
Soemphol W, Hongsachart P, Tanamool V. Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced from agricultural by-product by Gluconacetobacter strains. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(5):11159–68.
doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.036
Gayathri G, Srinikethan G. Crude glycerol as a cost-effective carbon source for the production of cellulose by K saccharivorans. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018;16:326–30.
doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.08.024
Yang X, Kim DS, Choi HS, Kim CK, Thapa LP, Park C, et al. Repeated batch production of 1,3-propanediol from biodiesel derived waste glycerol by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Chem Eng J. 2017;314:660–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.029
Lu T, Gao H, Liao B, Wu J, Zhang W, Huang J, et al. Characterization and optimization of production of bacterial cellulose from strain CGMCC 17276 based on whole-genome analysis. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;232:115788.
pubmed: 31952596
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115788
Kaur J, Sarma AK, Jha MK, Gera P. Valorisation of crude glycerol to value-added products: Perspectives of process technology, economics and environmental issues. Biotechnol Rep. 2020;27:e00487.
doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00487
Zikmanis P, Kolesovs S, Ruklisha M, Semjonovs P. Production of bacterial cellulose from glycerol: the current state and perspectives. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2021;8(1):116.
doi: 10.1186/s40643-021-00468-1
El-Gaayda J, Titchou FE, Oukhrib R, Yap PS, Liu T, Hamdani M, et al. Natural flocculants for the treatment of wastewaters containing dyes or heavy metals: a state-of-the-art review. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(5):106060.
doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106060
Manzocco L, Anese M, Nicoli MC. Antioxidant properties of tea extracts as affected by processing. LWT Food Sci Technol. 1998;31(7–8):694–8.
doi: 10.1006/fstl.1998.0491
Zhang L, Zha M, Li S, Zong W. Investigation on the effect of thermal sterilization versus non-thermal sterilization on the quality parameters of jujube juice fermented by Lactobacillus plantarum. J Food Sci Technol. 2022;59(10):3765–74.
pubmed: 36193366
pmcid: 9525505
doi: 10.1007/s13197-022-05358-8
deWit JN, Klarenbeek G. Effects of various heat treatments on structure and solubility of whey proteins. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67(11):2701–10.
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81628-8
Saleh AK, Tolba E, Salama A. In situ development of bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite membrane based on two different fermentation strategies: characterization and cytotoxicity evaluation. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03940-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s13399-023-03940-4
Tian D, Shen F, Hu J, Renneckar S, Saddler JN. Enhancing bacterial cellulose production via adding mesoporous halloysite nanotubes in the culture medium. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;198:191–6.
pubmed: 30092990
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.026
Tsouko E, Kourmentza C, Ladakis D, Kopsahelis N, Mandala I, Papanikolaou S, et al. Bacterial cellulose production from industrial waste and by-product streams. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(12):14832–49.
pubmed: 26140376
pmcid: 4519874
doi: 10.3390/ijms160714832
Natsia A, Tsouko E, Pateraki C, Efthymiou MN, Papagiannopoulos A, Selianitis D, et al. Valorization of wheat milling by-products into bacterial nanocellulose via ex-situ modification following circular economy principles. Sustain Chem Pharm. 2022;29:100832.
doi: 10.1016/j.scp.2022.100832
Andritsou V, de Melo EM, Tsouko E, Ladakis D, Maragkoudaki S, Koutinas AA, et al. Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose from citrus-based sustainable resources. ACS Omega. 2018;3(8):10365–73.
pubmed: 31459164
pmcid: 6644481
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01315
Selianitis D, Efthymiou MN, Tsouko E, Papagiannopoulos A, Koutinas A, Pispas S. Nanocellulose production from different sources and their self-assembly in composite materials. In: Barhoum A, editor. Handbook of Nanocelluloses. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62976-2_7-1 .
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-62976-2_7-1
Phan ADT, Netzel G, Wang D, Flanagan BM, D’Arcy BR, Gidley MJ. Binding of dietary polyphenols to cellulose: Structural and nutritional aspects. Food Chem. 2015;171:388–96.
pubmed: 25308685
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.08.118
Mohseni-Shahri F, Mehrzad A, Khoshbin Z, Sarabi-Jamab M, Khanmohamadi F, Verdian A. Polyphenol-loaded bacterial cellulose nanofiber as a green indicator for fish spoilage. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;224:1174–82.
pubmed: 36306914
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.203
Halász K, Csóka L. Black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) pomace extract immobilized in chitosan for colorimetric pH indicator film application. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2018;16:185–93.
doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.03.002
Andretta R, Luchese CL, Tessaro IC, Spada JC. Development and characterization of pH-indicator films based on cassava starch and blueberry residue by thermocompression. Food Hydrocoll. 2019;93:317–24.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.019
Liang T, Sun G, Cao L, Li J, Wang L. A pH and NH3 sensing intelligent film based on Artemisia sphaerocephala Krasch. gum and red cabbage anthocyanins anchored by carboxymethyl cellulose sodium added as a host complex. Food Hydrocoll. 2019;87:858–68.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.08.028
Yaseen DA, Scholz M. Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2019;16(2):1193–226.
doi: 10.1007/s13762-018-2130-z
Khan J, Sayed M, Ali F, Khan HM. Removal of acid yellow 17 dye by Fenton oxidation process. Z Für Phys Chem. 2018;232(4):507–25.
doi: 10.1515/zpch-2017-1072
Huda A, Suman PH, Torquato LDM, Silva BF, Handoko CT, Gulo F, et al. Visible light-driven photoelectrocatalytic degradation of acid yellow 17 using Sn3O4 flower-like thin films supported on Ti substrate (Sn3O4/TiO2/Ti). J Photochem Photobiol Chem. 2019;376:196–205.
doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.01.039
Ben Mansour H, Corroler D, Barillier D, Ghedira K, Chekir L, Mosrati R. Evaluation of genotoxicity and pro-oxidant effect of the azo dyes: acids yellow 17, violet 7 and orange 52, and of their degradation products by Pseudomonas putida mt-2. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007;45(9):1670–7.
pubmed: 17434654
doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.02.033
Munagapati VS, Wen HY, Vijaya Y, Wen JC, Wen JH, Tian Z, et al. Removal of anionic (Acid Yellow 17 and Amaranth) dyes using aminated avocado (Persea americana ) seed powder: adsorption/desorption, kinetics, isotherms, thermodynamics, and recycling studies. Int J Phytoremediation. 2021;23(9):911–23.
pubmed: 33406890
doi: 10.1080/15226514.2020.1866491
Mohite BV, Patil SV. Bacterial cellulose of Gluconoacetobacter hansenii as a potential bioadsorption agent for its green environment applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2014;25(18):2053–65.
pubmed: 25325322
doi: 10.1080/09205063.2014.970063
Sukphan S, Buapho P, Laingaumnuay N, Jaturapiree P. Bacterial cellulose: an eco-friendly low cost biomaterial for dye removal. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2023;1280(1):012008.
doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1280/1/012008
Chen X, Cui J, Xu X, Sun B, Zhang L, Dong W, et al. Bacterial cellulose/attapulgite magnetic composites as an efficient adsorbent for heavy metal ions and dye treatment. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;229:115512.
pubmed: 31826502
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115512
Ferreira-Neto EP, Ullah S, da Silva TCA, Domeneguetti RR, Perissinotto AP, de Vicente FS, et al. Bacterial nanocellulose/MoS
pubmed: 32809794
doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c14137
Troncoso OP, Torres FG. Bacterial cellulose—graphene based nanocomposites. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6532.
pubmed: 32906692
pmcid: 7556017
doi: 10.3390/ijms21186532
de Ojembarrena FB, García S, Merayo N, Blanco A, Negro C. Ni(II) and Pb(II) removal using bacterial cellulose membranes. Polymers. 2023;15(18):3684.
pubmed: 37765537
pmcid: 10534930
doi: 10.3390/polym15183684
Cheng R, Chen Y, Jiang P, Zheng J, Zheng X. Deeply removal of trace Cd2+ from water by bacterial cellulose membrane loaded with nanoscale zerovalent iron: practical application and mechanism. Chem Eng J. 2023;468:143668.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.143668