Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit.
Compassionate care in the intensive care unit
End-of-life care
End-of-life care communication
End-of-life care foregoing of life support
End-of-life decision making
Legal issues in end-of-life care
Palliative care
Terminal care
withdrawal and withholding ethics
Journal
Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine
ISSN: 0972-5229
Titre abrégé: Indian J Crit Care Med
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101208863
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
01
02
2024
accepted:
28
02
2024
medline:
13
3
2024
pubmed:
13
3
2024
entrez:
13
3
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
End-of-life care (EOLC) exemplifies the joint mission of intensive and palliative care (PC) in their human-centeredness. The explosion of technological advances in medicine must be balanced with the culture of holistic care. Inevitably, it brings together the science and the art of medicine in their full expression. High-quality EOLC in the ICU is grounded in evidence, ethical principles, and professionalism within the framework of the Law. Expert professional statements over the last two decades in India were developed while the law was evolving. Recent landmark Supreme Court judgments have necessitated a review of the clinical pathway for EOLC outlined in the previous statements. Much empirical and interventional evidence has accumulated since the position statement in 2014. This iteration of the joint Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine-Indian Association of Palliative Care (ISCCM-IAPC) Position Statement for EOLC combines contemporary evidence, ethics, and law for decision support by the bedside in Indian ICUs. Mani RK, Bhatnagar S, Butola S, Gursahani R, Mehta D, Simha S,
Identifiants
pubmed: 38477011
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24661
pmc: PMC10926026
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
200-250Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
*One of the questions that the Court framed for consideration was “In a person in a permanent vegetative state, should WH or WD of life-sustaining therapies be permissible or not unlawful” #Section 115 of the Act states that any person who attempts to commit suicide is presumed to have severe stress and shall not be tried or punished under the Indian Penal Code. $Common cause, Paragraphs 198 and 199 of Chief Justice Mishra's judgement consistently refer to both WH and WD while laying down the procedure. @Section 2(i) of THOA defines “near relative” to mean “spouse, son, daughter, father, mother, brother, sister, grandfather, grandmother, grandson, or granddaughter.” *Only if donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) is included in the THOA protocol.