Outcomes of dogs with apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma treated via modified closed anal sacculectomy (2015-2022).
Journal
Veterinary surgery : VS
ISSN: 1532-950X
Titre abrégé: Vet Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8113214
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Mar 2024
13 Mar 2024
Historique:
revised:
11
02
2024
received:
25
06
2023
accepted:
25
02
2024
medline:
13
3
2024
pubmed:
13
3
2024
entrez:
13
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To evaluate the postoperative complication rate and local recurrence rate of apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma (AGASACA) in dogs surgically treated with a modified closed anal sacculectomy technique between 2015 and 2022. Observational clinical retrospective study. Forty-seven client-owned dogs histologically diagnosed with AGASACA. Medical records were evaluated for patient demographics and history, physical examination findings, diagnostic imaging, incidence of concurrent neoplasia, postoperative complications, and incidence and time to local recurrence. Dogs with at least 150 days of follow-up were included in evaluation of local recurrence. Two dogs were euthanized at 4 and 11 days after surgery. Forty-five dogs were included for long-term local recurrence evaluation, with a median of 364 days of follow-up (range 156-2156 days). Only one dog (2.2%) developed local recurrence with a time to recurrence of 90 days. Postoperative complications were reported in 15 dogs (31.9%) and were considered minor in 14 dogs (93.3%) and major in one dog (6.7%). Mean survival time for the 20 dogs that were deceased as of November 1, 2022 was 521 days (range 156-1409 days) and the median survival time was 388 days. The modified closed anal sacculectomy technique resulted in a lower AGASACA local recurrence rate than previously reported in the veterinary literature with a comparable postoperative complication rate. Given the low recurrence rate found in this study, the modified closed anal sacculectomy technique may reduce the need for adjuvant radiation therapy and potentially chemotherapy in AGASACA patients.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Références
Sterman A, Butler JR, Chambers A, et al. Post-operative complications following apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma resection in dogs. Vet Comp Oncol. 2021;19:743-749. doi:10.1111/vco.12748
Tanis J-B, Simlett-Moss AB, Ossowksa M, et al. Canine anal sac gland carcinoma with regional lymph node metastases treated with sacculectomy and lymphadenectomy: outcome and possible prognostic factors. Vet Comp Oncol. 2021;20:276-292.
Turek MM, Forrest LJ, Adams WM, Helfand SC, Vail DM. Postoperative radiotherapy and mitoxantrone for anal sac adenocarcinoma in the dog: 15 cases (1991-2001). Vet Comp Oncol. 2003;1:94-104. doi:10.1046/j.1476-5829.2003.00013.x
Williams LE, Gliatto JM, Dodge RK, et al. Carcinoma of the apocrine glands of the anal sac in dogs: 113 cases (1985-1995). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;223:825-831. doi:10.2460/javma.2003.223.825
Bennett PF, DeNicola DB, Bonney P, Glickman MW, Knapp DW. Canine anal sac adenocarcinomas: clinical presentation and response to therapy. J Vet Intern Med. 2002;16:100-104. doi:10.1111/j.1939-1676.2002.tb01613.x
Morello EM, Cino M, Giacobino D, et al. Prognostic value of Ki67 and other clinical and histopathological factors in canine apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma. Animals. 2021;11:1649. doi:10.3390/ani11061649
Emms SG. Anal sac tumours of the dog and their response to cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy. Aust Vet J. 2005;83:340-343. doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.2005.tb15626.x
Sutton DR, Hernon T, Hezzell MJ, et al. Computed tomographic staging of dogs with anal sac adenocarcinoma. J Small Anim Pract. 2022;63:27-33. doi:10.1111/jsap.13426
Polton GA, Brearley MJ. Clinical stage, therapy, and prognosis in canine anal sac gland carcinoma. J Vet Intern Med. 2008;21:274-280.
Potanas CP, Padgett S, Gamblin RM. Surgical excision of anal sac apocrine gland adenocarcinomas with and without adjunctive chemotherapy in dogs: 42 cases (2005-2011). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015;246:877-884. doi:10.2460/javma.246.8.877
Hobson HP, Brown MR, Rogers KS. Surgery of metastatic anal sac adenocarcinoma in five dogs. Vet Surg. 2006;35:267-270. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00137.x
McQuown B, Keyerleber MA, Rosen K, McEntee MC, Burgess KE. Treatment of advanced canine anal sac adenocarcinoma with hypofractionated radiation therapy: 77 cases (1999-2013). Vet Comp Oncol. 2017;15:840-851. doi:10.1111/vco.12226
Meier V, Polton G, Cancedda S, et al. Outcome in dogs with advanced (Stage 3b) anal sac gland carcinoma treated with surgery or hypofractionated radiation therapy. Vet Comp Oncol. 2017;15:1073-1086. doi:10.1111/vco.12248
Skorupski KA, Alarcón CN, de Lorimier L-P, LaDouceur EEB, Rodriguez CO, Rebhun RB. Outcome and clinical, pathological, and immunohistochemical factors associated with prognosis for dogs with early-stage anal sac adenocarcinoma treated with surgery alone: 34 cases (2002-2013). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018;253:84-91. doi:10.2460/javma.253.1.84
Hill LN, Smeak DD. Open vs closed bilateral anal sacculectomy for treatment of non-neoplastic anal sac disease in dogs: 95 cases (1969-1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;221:662-665. doi:10.2460/javma.2002.221.662
Macphail C. Surgical views: anal Sacculectomy. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2008;30:E9.
Chambers AR, Skinner OT, Mickelson MA, et al. Adherence to follow-up recommendations for dogs with apocrine gland anal sac adenocarcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study. Vet Comp Oncol. 2020;18:683-688. doi:10.1111/vco.12597
Dindo D, Martines D, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-213. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Owen LN. TNM Classification of Tumors in Domestic Animals. World Health Organization: Veterinary Public Health Unit & WHO Collaborating Center for Comparative Oncology; 1980:12-13.
Charlesworth TM. Risk factors for postoperative complications following bilateral closed anal sacculectomy in the dog. J Small Anim Pract. 2014;55:350-354. doi:10.1111/jsap.12217