Incidence of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography after Subtotal Fenestrating and Reconstituting Cholecystectomy.


Journal

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
ISSN: 1879-1190
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9431305

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 13 3 2024
pubmed: 13 3 2024
entrez: 13 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) is used for the difficult cholecystectomy, but published experience with resource utilization for SC is limited. We hypothesized that the need for advanced resources are common after SC. Retrospective review of laparoscopic cholecystectomies between 2017 and 2021 at a large center. SC cases were identified using a medical record tool. Baseline characteristics were assessed with student's t-test and chi-squared. Primary outcome was ERC within 60-days. Secondary outcomes were reconstituted SC on post-op ERC and length of stay (LOS). Uni- and multivariable logistic regression were used for binary outcomes. Multiple linear regression was used for LOS. Covariates included age, sex, BMI, ASA class. A total of 1222 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed between 2017 and 2021. Of these, 87 (7%) were SC. Male (p<0.001) and older (p<0.001) patients were more likely to undergo SC. Odds of post-op ERC were higher in the SC group (OR 9.79 95% CI 5.90, 16.23 p<0.001). There was no difference in pre-op ERC (17% vs 21% p=0.38). Reconstituting SC had lower odds of post-op ERC (OR 0.12, 0.023-0.58, p=0.009). LOS was 1.81 times higher in the SC group(p=<0.001). Post-op ERC was not associated with LOS (p=.24). We present one of the largest single-center series of SC. SC patients are more likely to be male, older, have higher ASA class, and have increased LOS. SC should be performed when access to ERC and interventional radiology is available. Absent these adjuncts, reconstituting SC decreases the need for early ERC, but long-term outcomes are unknown.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) is used for the difficult cholecystectomy, but published experience with resource utilization for SC is limited. We hypothesized that the need for advanced resources are common after SC.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Retrospective review of laparoscopic cholecystectomies between 2017 and 2021 at a large center. SC cases were identified using a medical record tool. Baseline characteristics were assessed with student's t-test and chi-squared. Primary outcome was ERC within 60-days. Secondary outcomes were reconstituted SC on post-op ERC and length of stay (LOS). Uni- and multivariable logistic regression were used for binary outcomes. Multiple linear regression was used for LOS. Covariates included age, sex, BMI, ASA class.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 1222 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed between 2017 and 2021. Of these, 87 (7%) were SC. Male (p<0.001) and older (p<0.001) patients were more likely to undergo SC. Odds of post-op ERC were higher in the SC group (OR 9.79 95% CI 5.90, 16.23 p<0.001). There was no difference in pre-op ERC (17% vs 21% p=0.38). Reconstituting SC had lower odds of post-op ERC (OR 0.12, 0.023-0.58, p=0.009). LOS was 1.81 times higher in the SC group(p=<0.001). Post-op ERC was not associated with LOS (p=.24).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We present one of the largest single-center series of SC. SC patients are more likely to be male, older, have higher ASA class, and have increased LOS. SC should be performed when access to ERC and interventional radiology is available. Absent these adjuncts, reconstituting SC decreases the need for early ERC, but long-term outcomes are unknown.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38477475
doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001072
pii: 00019464-990000000-00943
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mina F Nordness (MF)

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Michael C Smith (MC)

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Jessa Fogel (J)

Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, TN.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.

Oscar D Guillamondegui (OD)

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Bradley M Dennis (BM)

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Oliver L Gunter (OL)

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Classifications MeSH