Why and when should we cluster randomize?


Journal

Journal of epidemiology and population health
ISSN: 2950-4333
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol Popul Health
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9918769574106676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 24 10 2023
revised: 06 12 2023
accepted: 11 12 2023
medline: 13 3 2024
pubmed: 13 3 2024
entrez: 13 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A cluster randomized trial is defined as a randomized trial in which intact social units of individuals are randomized rather than individuals themselves. Outcomes are observed on individual participants within clusters (such as patients). Such a design allows assessing interventions targeting cluster-level participants (such as physicians), individual participants or both. Indeed, many interventions assessed in cluster randomized trials are actually complex ones, with distinct components targeting different levels. For a cluster-level intervention, cluster randomization is an obvious choice: the intervention is not divisible at the individual-level. For individual-level interventions, cluster randomization may nevertheless be suitable to prevent group contamination, for logistical reasons, to enhance participants' adherence, or when objectives pertain to the cluster level. An unacceptable reason for cluster randomization would be to avoid obtaining individual consent. Indeed, participants in cluster randomized trials have to be protected as in any type of trial design. Participants may be people from whom data are collected, but they may also be people who are intervened upon, and this includes both patients and physicians (for example, physicians receiving training interventions). Consent should be sought as soon as possible, although there may exist situations where participants may consent only for data collection, not for being exposed to the intervention (because, for instance, they cannot opt-out). There may even be situations where participants are not able to consent at all. In this latter situation a waiver of consent must be granted by a research ethics committee.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38477478
pii: S2950-4333(24)00008-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jeph.2024.202197
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

202197

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Bruno Giraudeau (B)

Université de Tours, Université de Nantes, INSERM, SPHERE U1246, Tours, France; INSERM CIC1415, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France. Electronic address: bruno.giraudeau@univ-tours.fr.

Charles Weijer (C)

Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Philosophy, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada.

Sandra M Eldridge (SM)

Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.

Karla Hemming (K)

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Monica Taljaard (M)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Classifications MeSH