Complexity of Chemical Emissions Increases Concurrently with Sexual Maturity in Heliconius Butterflies.
Heliconius
Aging
Androconia
Antiaphrodisiac
GC-MS
Lepidoptera
Pheromones
Journal
Journal of chemical ecology
ISSN: 1573-1561
Titre abrégé: J Chem Ecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Mar 2024
13 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
04
06
2023
accepted:
03
03
2024
revised:
21
02
2024
medline:
13
3
2024
pubmed:
13
3
2024
entrez:
13
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Pheromone communication is widespread among animals. Since it is often involved in mate choice, pheromone production is often tightly controlled. Although male sex pheromones (MSPs) and anti-aphrodisiacs have been studied in some Heliconius butterfly species, little is known about the factors affecting their production and release in these long-lived butterflies. Here, we investigate the effect of post-eclosion age on chemical blends from pheromone-emitting tissues in Heliconius atthis and Heliconius charithonia, exhibiting respectively free-mating and pupal-mating strategies that are hypothesised to differently affect the timing of their pheromone emissions. We focus on two different tissues: the wing androconia, responsible for MSPs used in courtship, and the genital tip, the production site for anti-aphrodisiac pheromones that affect post-mating behaviour. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis of tissue extracts from virgin males and females of both species from day 0 to 8 post-eclosion demonstrates the following. Some ubiquitous fatty acid precursors are already detectable at day 0. The complexity of the chemical blends increases with age regardless of tissue or sex. No obvious difference in the time course of blend production was evident between the two species, but female tissues in H. charithonia were more affected by age than in H. atthis. We suggest that compounds unique to male androconia and genitals and whose amount increases with age are potential candidates for future investigation into their roles as pheromones. While this analysis revealed some of the complexity in Heliconius chemical ecology, the effects of other factors, such as the time of day, remain unknown.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38478290
doi: 10.1007/s10886-024-01484-z
pii: 10.1007/s10886-024-01484-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre
ID : NE/K012886/1
Organisme : Deutsche Forscungsgemeinschaft
ID : Schu984 12/1
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Agerbirk N et al (2010) Complex metabolism of aromatic glucosinolates in Pieris rapae caterpillars involving nitrile formation, hydroxylation, demethylation, sulfation, and host plant dependent carboxylic acid formation. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol 40. Pergamon, pp 126–137. 2 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.01.003 .
Allison JD, Carde RT (2017) Pheromone communication in moths: evolution, Behavior, and application. University of California Press, Oakland. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/tmx069
doi: 10.1093/ae/tmx069
Andersson J, Borg-Karlson AK, Wiklund C (2000) ‘Sexual cooperation and conflict in butterflies: a male-transferred anti-aphrodisiac reduces harassment of recently mated females’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Royal Society, 267(1450), pp. 1271–1275. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1138
Andersson J, Borg-Karlson AK, Wiklund C (2003) Antiaphrodisiacs in pierid butterflies: a theme with variation! Journal of Chemical Ecology 29(6):1489–1499. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024277823101
doi: 10.1023/A:1024277823101
pubmed: 12918930
Andersson J et al (2007) Male sex pheromone release and female mate choice in a butterfly. J Exp Biol 210:964–970. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02726
doi: 10.1242/jeb.02726
pubmed: 17337709
Arrese EL, Soulages JL (2010) Insect fat body: Energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annual Review of Entomology. NIH Public Access, pp 207–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085356 .
Beggs KT et al (2007) Queen pheromone modulates brain dopamine function in worker honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(7):2460–2464. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608224104 . National Academy of Sciences
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608224104
pubmed: 17287354
pmcid: 1892986
Beltrán M et al (2007) Do pollen feeding, pupal-mating and larval gregariousness have a single origin in Heliconius butterflies? Inferences from multilocus DNA sequence data. Biol J Linn Soc Oxf Acad 92(2):221–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00830.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00830.x
Bengtsson M et al (2014) Pheromone races of Cydia Splendana (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) overlap in host plant association and geographic distribution’, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Front Media S A 2(46). https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00046
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) ‘Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). Wiley, 57(1), pp. 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Bjostad LB, Roelofs WL (1981) ‘Sex pheromone biosynthesis from radiolabeled fatty acids in the redbanded leafroller moth.’, The Journal of biological chemistry. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 256(15), pp. 7936–40
Blomquist GJ, Ginzel MD (2021) Chemical Ecology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Biology of Insect hydrocarbons. Ann Rev Entomol 66:45–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-031620-071754
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-031620-071754
Brown KS (1981) ‘The Biology of Heliconius and Related Genera’, Annual Review of Entomology. Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way, P.O. Box 10139, Palo Alto, CA 94303-0139, USA, 26(1), pp. 427–457. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.26.010181.002235
Byers KJRP et al (2020) A major locus controls a biologically active pheromone component in Heliconius melpomene’, evolution. Soc Study Evol 74(2):349–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13922
doi: 10.1111/evo.13922
Cama B (2022) Evolution of chemical signals in Heliconius butterflies
Cama B et al (2022) ‘Exploitation of an ancestral pheromone biosynthetic pathway contributes to diversification in Heliconius butterflies’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Royal Society Publishing, 289(1979). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0474
Casselton LA (2002) ‘Mate recognition in fungi’, in Heredity. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp. 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800035
Chung H, Carroll SB (2015) ‘Wax, sex and the origin of species: Dual roles of insect cuticular hydrocarbons in adaptation and mating’, BioEssays. John Wiley and Sons Inc., 37(7), pp. 822–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201500014
Clayton RB (1964) The utilization of sterols by insects. Journal of lipid research. Elsevier, pp 3–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)40254-8 .
Coppée A et al (2011) Age-dependent attractivity of males’ sexual pheromones in Bombus terrestris (L.) [Hymenoptera, Apidae]. Chemoecology 21(2):75–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-011-0070-x
doi: 10.1007/s00049-011-0070-x
Cory AL, Schneider JM (2016) ‘Old maids have more appeal: Effects of age and pheromone source on mate attraction in an orb-web spider’, PeerJ. PeerJ Inc., 2016(4). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1877
Cuvillier-Hot V et al (2001) ‘Sex, age and ovarian activity affect cuticular hydrocarbons in Diacamma ceylonense, a queenless ant’, Journal of Insect Physiology. Pergamon, 47(4–5), pp. 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(00)00137-2
Darragh K et al (2017) ‘Male sex pheromone components in Heliconius butterflies released by the androconia affect female choice’, PeerJ. PeerJ Inc., 5, p. e3953. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3953
Darragh K, Orteu A et al (2019) A novel terpene synthase produces an anti-aphrodisiac pheromone in the butterfly Heliconius melpomene’, bioRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, p 779678. https://doi.org/10.1101/779678
Darragh K, Byers KJRP et al (2019) Male pheromone composition depends on larval but not adult diet in Heliconius melpomene. Ecological entomology, vol 44. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp 397–405. 3 doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12716 .
Darragh K et al (2020) Species specificity and intraspecific variation in the chemical profiles of Heliconius butterflies across a large geographic range. Ecology and Evolution, vol 10. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, pp 3895–3918. 9 doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6079 .
Davis-Foster D (2019) PyMassSpec — PyMassSpec 2.2.21 documentation. Available at: https://pymassspec.readthedocs.io/en/master/ (Accessed: 17 June 2020)
De Cáceres M, Legendre P (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecol Ecol 90(12):3566–3574. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1823.1
doi: 10.1890/08-1823.1
Deinert EI, Longino JT, Gilbert LE (1994) Mate competition in butterflies. Nature 23–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/370023a0
Dixon P (2003) ‘VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology’, Journal of Vegetation Science. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111), 14(6), pp. 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x
Domínguez A et al (2019) Influence of age, Host Plant and mating Status in Pheromone Production and New insights on Perception Plasticity in Tuta Absoluta. Insects MDPI AG 10(8):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10080256
doi: 10.3390/insects10080256
Dong C et al (2020) ‘Convergent evolution of small molecule pheromones in Pristionchus nematodes’, eLife. eLife Sciences Publications Ltd, 9. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55687
Drickamer LC, Brown PL (1998) Age-related changes in odor preferences by house mice living in seminatural enclosures’, Journal of Chemical Ecology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 24(11):1745–1756. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022395130489
doi: 10.1023/A:1022395130489
Ehlers S et al (2021) ‘Identification and Composition of Clasper Scent Gland Components of the Butterfly Heliconius erato and Its Relation to Mimicry’, ChemBioChem. John Wiley and Sons Inc, 22(23), pp. 3300–3313. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202100372
Ehlers S et al (2023) ‘Variation of Clasper Scent Gland Composition of Heliconius Butterflies from a Biodiversity Hotspot’, ChemBioChem. John Wiley and Sons Inc, 24(22). https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202300537
Eltringham H (1925) VI. On the abdominal glands in Heliconius (Lepidoptera). Trans Royal Entomol Soc Lond 73(1–2):269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1925.tb02862.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1925.tb02862.x
Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American naturalist, vol 139. University of Chicago Press, Suppl. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/285308 .
Estrada C et al (2010) Sex-specific chemical cues from immatures facilitate the evolution of mate guarding in Heliconius butterflies. Proc Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 277(1680):407–413. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1476
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1476
Estrada C et al (2011) Sexual selection drives the evolution of antiaphrodisiac pheromones in butterflies’, Evolution. Blackwell Publishing Inc 65(10):2843–2854. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01352.x
Everaerts C et al (2010) ‘Drosophila Cuticular Hydrocarbons Revisited: Mating Status Alters Cuticular Profiles’, PLoS ONE. Edited by F. Marion-Poll. Public Library of Science, 5(3), p. e9607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009607
Felton GW, Summers CB (1995) Antioxidant systems in insects. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 29(2):187–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.940290208
doi: 10.1002/arch.940290208
pubmed: 7606043
Fraenkel G, Blewett M (1945) Linoleic acid, α-tocopherol and other fat-soluble substances as nutritional factors for insects’, Nature. Nature Publishing Group, pp 392–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/155392c0
Francke W, Schulz S (2010) ‘4.04 – Pheromones of Terrestrial Invertebrates’, in Mander L and Liu H (eds) Comprehensive Natural Products II, pp. 153–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045382-8.00095-2
Gilbert LE (1976) Postmating female odor in Heliconius butterflies: a male-contributed antiaphrodisiac?’, Science. Am Association Advancement Sci 193(4251):419–420. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.935877
doi: 10.1126/science.935877
Gimpl G, Burger K, Fahrenholz F (1997) Cholesterol as modulator of receptor function. Biochemistry 36(36):10959–10974. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi963138w
doi: 10.1021/bi963138w
pubmed: 9283088
Glover TJ, Tang XH, Roelofs WL (1987) Sex pheromone blend discrimination by male moths from E and Z strains of European corn borer. Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol 13. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum, pp 143–151. 1 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020358 .
González-Rojas MF et al (2020) ‘Chemical signals act as the main reproductive barrier between sister and mimetic Heliconius butterflies’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Royal Society Publishing, 287(1926), p. 20200587. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0587
Gosling LM, Roberts SC (2001) Scent-marking by male mammals: cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates. Advances in the study of Behavior, vol 30. Academic Press Inc., pp 169–217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-3454(01)80007-3 .
Grammer K, Fink B, Neave N (2005) Human pheromones and sexual attraction. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. Elsevier Ireland Ltd, pp 135–142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.08.010 .
Hardege JD et al (1998) Timing of reproduction in marine polychaetes: the role of sex pheromones. Ecoscience Universite Laval 5(3):395–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.1998.11682477
doi: 10.1080/11956860.1998.11682477
Heuskin S et al (2014) The composition of cuticular compounds indicates body parts, sex and age in the model butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Lepidoptera)’, frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Front Media S A 2(JUL). https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00037
Hillier NK, Vickers NJ (2004) The role of heliothine hairpencil compounds in female Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) behavior and mate acceptance. Chem Senses Chem Senses 29(6):499–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh052
doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjh052
pubmed: 15269122
Howard RW, Blomquist GJ (1982) Chemical Ecology and Biochemistry of Insect Hydrocarbons. Ann Rev Entomol 27(1):149–172. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.001053
doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.001053
Howard RW, Blomquist GJ (2005) Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Ann Rev Entomol 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130359
Jacob E, Ben et al (2004) Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence’, trends in Microbiology. Elsevier Ltd 12(8):366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.006
doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.006
Johansson BG, Jones TM (2007) ‘The role of chemical communication in mate choice’, Biological Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 82(2), pp. 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00009.x
Jurenka R (2004) ‘Insect Pheromone Biosynthesis’, in, pp. 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/b95450
Jurenka RA et al (2003) Sex pheromone biosynthetic pathway for disparlure in the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar’, proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Natl Acad Sci 100(3):809–814. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0236060100
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0236060100
Karl I, Heuskin S, Fischer K (2013) Dissecting the mechanisms underlying old male mating advantage in a butterfly. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol 67. Springer, pp 837–849. 5 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1507-8 .
Karlson P, Lüscher M (1959) Pheromones: a new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature 183(4653):55–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/183055a0
doi: 10.1038/183055a0
Klein AL, de Araújo AM (2010) Courtship behavior of Heliconius erato phyllis (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) towards virgin and mated females: conflict between attraction and repulsion signals? J Ethol 28(3):409–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-010-0209-1
doi: 10.1007/s10164-010-0209-1
Klun JA et al (1973) Insect sex pheromones: minor amount of opposite geometrical isomer critical to attraction’, Science. Am Association Advancement Sci 181(4100):661–663. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.181.4100.661
doi: 10.1126/science.181.4100.661
Kochansky J et al (1975) Sex pheromone of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in New York. Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum, pp 225–231. 2 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987871 .
Kuo TH et al (2012) Aging modulates cuticular hydrocarbons and sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster. J Experimental Biology Co Biologists 215(5):814–821. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.064980
doi: 10.1242/jeb.064980
Laidre ME, Johnstone RA (2013) Animal signals’, Current Biology. Cell Press 23(18):R829–R833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.070
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.070
Larsdotter-Mellström H et al (2012) ‘Timing of Male Sex Pheromone Biosynthesis in a Butterfly - Different Dynamics under Direct or Diapause Development’, Journal of Chemical Ecology. Springer, 38(5), pp. 584–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-012-0126-6
Liénard MA et al (2014) Sex pheromone biosynthetic pathways are conserved between moths and the butterfly Bicyclus Anynana. Nat Commun 5(3957). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4957
Linstrom PJ, Mallard WG (eds) (2021) NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 20899. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4D303
López P, Aragón P, Martín J (2003) Responses of female lizards, Lacerta Monticola, to males’ chemical cues reflect their mating preference for older males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55(1):73–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0675-3
doi: 10.1007/s00265-003-0675-3
Lorenzi MC et al (2004) Cuticular hydrocarbon dynamics in young adult Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) and the role of linear hydrocarbons in nestmate recognition systems. J Insect Physiol Pergamon 50(10):935–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.07.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.07.005
Luporini P, Alimenti C, Vallesi A (2015) Ciliate pheromone structures and activity: a review. Italian J Zool Taylor Francis Ltd 82(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250003.2014.976282
doi: 10.1080/11250003.2014.976282
Mann F et al (2017) The Scent Chemistry of Heliconius Wing Androconia’, Journal of Chemical Ecology. Springer US 43(9):843–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-017-0867-3
doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0867-3
Mérot C et al (2015) Beyond magic traits: multimodal mating cues in Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 69(11):2891–2904. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12789
doi: 10.1111/evo.12789
pubmed: 26513426
Merrill RM et al (2015) The diversification of Heliconius butterflies: what have we learned in 150 years? J Evolutionary Biology Wiley/Blackwell (10 1111) 28(8):1417–1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12672
doi: 10.1111/jeb.12672
Meyer HJ, Norris DM (1967) Vanillin and Syringaldehyde as attractants for Scolytus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 60(4):858–859
doi: 10.1093/aesa/60.4.858
Moadeli T et al (2020) Effects of fatty acids and vitamin E in larval diets on development and performance of Queensland fruit fly. Journal of Insect Physiology, vol 125. Elsevier Ltd, p 104058. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104058 .
Morel L, Vander Meer RK, Lavine BK (1988) Ontogeny of nestmate recognition cues in the red carpenter ant (Camponotus floridanus) - behavioral and chemical evidence for the role of age and social experience. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22(3):175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300567
doi: 10.1007/BF00300567
Myers J (1972) Pheromones and courtship behavior in butterflies’, American zoologist. Oxf Acad 12(3):545–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/12.3.545
doi: 10.1093/icb/12.3.545
Nieberding CM et al (2008) ‘The Male Sex Pheromone of the Butterfly Bicyclus anynana: Towards an Evolutionary Analysis’, PLoS ONE. Edited by M. Somers. Public Library of Science, 3(7), p. e2751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002751
Nieberding CM et al (2012) Cracking the olfactory code of a butterfly: the scent of ageing. Ecology letters, vol 15. Wiley, pp 415–424. 5 doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01748.x .Ltd
O’Callaghan S et al (2012) PyMS: a Python toolkit for processing of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) data. Application and comparative study of selected tools. BMC Bioinf BioMed Cent 13(1):115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-115
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-115
Panek LM, Gamboa GJ, Espelie KE (2001) The Effect of a Wasp’s age on its Cuticular Hydrocarbon Profile and its tolerance by Nestmate and Non-nestmate Conspecifics (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae)’, ethology, vol 107. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp 55–63. 110.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00633.x
Pickett JA, Williams IH, Martin AP (1982) ‘(Z)-11-eicosen-1-ol, an important new pheromonal component from the sting of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae.)’, Journal of Chemical Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers, 8(1), pp. 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984013
Pokorny T et al (2020) Age-dependent release of and response to alarm pheromone in a ponerine ant. J Experimental Biology Co Biologists Ltd 223(6). https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.218040
Polidori C et al (2017) Post-mating shift towards longer-chain cuticular hydrocarbons drastically reduces female attractiveness to males in a digger wasp. Journal of Insect Physiology, vol 100. Elsevier Ltd, pp 119–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.05.001 .
Rafaeli A, Soroker V (1989) Influence of diel rhythm and brain hormone on pheromone production in two lepidopteran species. Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol 15. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum, pp 447–455. 2 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014691 .
Raina AK, Klun JA, Stadelbacher EA (1986) Diel Periodicity and Effect of Age and mating on female sex pheromone titer in Heliothis Zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol 79. Oxford University Press (OUP), pp 128–131. 1 doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/79.1.128 .
Roelofs W, Bjostad L (1984) ‘Biosynthesis of lepidopteran pheromones’, Bioorganic Chemistry. Academic Press, pp. 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-2068(84)90011-7
Roelofs WL, Rooney AP (2003) Molecular genetics and evolution of pheromone biosynthesis in Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(Supplement 2):14599–14599. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1233767100
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1233767100
pubmed: 16576755
pmcid: 304125
Rosser N et al (2019) Geographic contrasts between pre- and postzygotic barriers are consistent with reinforcement in Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 73(9):1821–1838. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13804
doi: 10.1111/evo.13804
pubmed: 31334832
pmcid: 6771877
Ruther J et al (2014) ‘Pheromone Diversification and Age-Dependent Behavioural Plasticity Decrease Interspecific Mating Costs in Nasonia’, PLoS ONE. Edited by W. J. Etges. Public Library of Science, 9(2), p. e89214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089214
Schal C, Sevala V, Cardé RT (1998) Novel and highly specific transport of a volatile sex pheromone by hemolymph lipophorin in moths’, Naturwissenschaften, vol 85. Springer, pp 339–342. 710.1007/s001140050511
Schulz S (2013) Spider pheromones - a structural perspective. Journal of Chemical Ecology. Springer Science and Business Media, LLC, pp 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-012-0231-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s10886-012-0231-6
Schulz S et al (2008) An antiaphrodisiac in Heliconius melpomene butterflies. J Chem Ecol 34(1):82–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-007-9393-z
doi: 10.1007/s10886-007-9393-z
pubmed: 18080165
Schulz S, Yildizhan S, van Loon JJA (2011) The biosynthesis of Hexahydrofarnesylacetone in the Butterfly Pieris brassicae. Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol 37. Springer-, pp 360–363. 4 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-011-9939-y .
Sekimoto H (2005) Plant Sex Pheromones. Vitam Horm Vitam Horm:457–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0083-6729(05)72013-6
doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(05)72013-6
Singer TL (1998) ‘Roles of hydrocarbons in the recognition systems of insects’, American Zoologist. Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, 38(2), pp. 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/38.2.394
Snell TW (1998) Chemical ecology of rotifers. Hydrobiologia. Springer Netherlands, pp 267–276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017087003334 .
Southcott L, Kronforst MR (2018) Female mate choice is a reproductive isolating barrier in Heliconius butterflies’, ethology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 124(12):862–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12818
doi: 10.1111/eth.12818
Stacey N (2003) Hormones, pheromones and reproductive behavior. Fish Physiol Biochem 28(1–4):229–235. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FISH.0000030540.99732.2c
doi: 10.1023/B:FISH.0000030540.99732.2c
Stein SE (1999) An integrated method for spectrum extraction and compound identification from gas chromatography/mass spectrometry data. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Elsevier 10(8):770–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00047-1
doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00047-1
Thurman TJ et al (2018) Facultative pupal mating in Heliconius erato: implications for mate choice, female preference, and speciation. Ecology and Evolution, vol 8. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, pp 1882–1889. 3 doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3624 .
Tillman J et al (1999) A Insect pheromones - an overview of biosynthesis and endocrine regulation. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 481–514 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-1748(99)00016-8
Tregenza T et al (2000) ‘Inter- and intrapopulation effects of sex and age on epicuticular composition of meadow grasshopper, Chorthippus parallelus’, Journal of Chemical Ecology. Springer, 26(1), pp. 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005457931869
Vanjari S et al (2015) Male sex pheromone components in the butterfly Heliconius melpomene. bioRxiv p033506. https://doi.org/10.1101/033506
Walters JR et al (2012) Evaluating female remating rates in light of spermatophore degradation in Heliconius butterflies: pupal-mating monandry versus adult-mating polyandry. Ecol Entomol 37(4):257–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2012.01360.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2012.01360.x
Wicker-Thomas C et al (2015) Flexible origin of hydrocarbon/pheromone precursors in Drosophila melanogaster. J Lipid Res 56(11):2094–2101. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M060368
doi: 10.1194/jlr.M060368
pubmed: 26353752
pmcid: 4617396
Würf J et al (2020) Cuticular Hydrocarbons as Contact Sex Pheromone in the Parasitoid Wasp Urolepis rufipes’, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Front Media S A 8:180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00180
Wyatt T (2009) Pheromones and other Chemical communication in animals. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Elsevier Ltd, pp 611–616. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045046-9.01825-8 .
Yew JY, Chung H (2015) Insect pheromones: an overview of function, form, and discovery. Prog Lipid Res 59:88–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2015.06.001
doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2015.06.001
pubmed: 26080085
Zhang D-D, Löfstedt C (2015) Moth pheromone receptors: gene sequences, function, and evolution’, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. Front Media S A 3(SEP):105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2015.00105