A New Methodology for Evaluation of Large Vestibular Aqueduct in CT and MRI Images.


Journal

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
ISSN: 1537-4505
Titre abrégé: Otol Neurotol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100961504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 13 3 2024
pubmed: 13 3 2024
entrez: 13 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Development of a new method for large vestibular aqueduct (LVA)/large endolymphatic sac anomaly (LESA) assessment using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT)/cone beam CT (CBCT) images. The secondary objective was to compare both modalities. The gold standard for LVA diagnosis is the analysis of CT images using Valvassori and Clemis or Cincinnati criteria. The previous studies showed inconclusive results regarding the correlation between audiological and radiological data. Retrospective analysis of radiological images from 173 patients (315 ears), who were diagnosed with LVA/LESA based on CT/CBCT and/or MRI images of the temporal bone. The images obtained using both techniques were used to measure the following dimensions of vestibular aqueduct (VA)/endolymphatic duct (ED)/intraosseous endolymphatic sac (ES): width of the opening, length, and width at external aperture. In MRI images, the maximal contact diameters of the extraosseous or intraosseous ES and dura mater were measured as well. LVA has been reported to be bilateral in 82% (142 patients) and unilateral in 18% (31 patients) of cases. Comparison of MRI and CT/CBCT measurements showed a moderate correlation (0.64) in external aperture, a moderate correlation (0.57) in the width of the VA opening, and a weak correlation (0.34) in length measurements (p < 0.05). We developed a new method to identify the heterogeneous pathology of LVA/LESA using reconstruction along the VA/ED/intraosseous ES axis, three measurements on two planes, and focus on the maximal contact diameter between the extraosseous or intraosseous ES and dura mater.

Sections du résumé

HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
Development of a new method for large vestibular aqueduct (LVA)/large endolymphatic sac anomaly (LESA) assessment using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT)/cone beam CT (CBCT) images. The secondary objective was to compare both modalities.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The gold standard for LVA diagnosis is the analysis of CT images using Valvassori and Clemis or Cincinnati criteria. The previous studies showed inconclusive results regarding the correlation between audiological and radiological data.
METHODS METHODS
Retrospective analysis of radiological images from 173 patients (315 ears), who were diagnosed with LVA/LESA based on CT/CBCT and/or MRI images of the temporal bone. The images obtained using both techniques were used to measure the following dimensions of vestibular aqueduct (VA)/endolymphatic duct (ED)/intraosseous endolymphatic sac (ES): width of the opening, length, and width at external aperture. In MRI images, the maximal contact diameters of the extraosseous or intraosseous ES and dura mater were measured as well.
RESULTS RESULTS
LVA has been reported to be bilateral in 82% (142 patients) and unilateral in 18% (31 patients) of cases. Comparison of MRI and CT/CBCT measurements showed a moderate correlation (0.64) in external aperture, a moderate correlation (0.57) in the width of the VA opening, and a weak correlation (0.34) in length measurements (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
We developed a new method to identify the heterogeneous pathology of LVA/LESA using reconstruction along the VA/ED/intraosseous ES axis, three measurements on two planes, and focus on the maximal contact diameter between the extraosseous or intraosseous ES and dura mater.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38478413
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004154
pii: 00129492-202404000-00026
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

440-446

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest and source of funding: As a first author, I am disclosing that my sister Justina Ivanauskaite is working as a director of data science in Animal Health IT, MSD Czech Republic. The content of our research is not related to the products of MSD, and our partnership on this research is based on our familial relationship. In addition, I received a travel grant from the Cluster of Excellence “Hearing4all” EXC 1077/1, 30625 Hanover, Germany, to attend the ARO MidWinter 2023 meeting. For the remaining authors, none were declared.

Références

Nordström CK, Laurell G, Rask-Andersen H. The human vestibular aqueduct: anatomical characteristics and enlargement criteria. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:1637–45.
Valvassori GE, Clemis JD. The large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Laryngoscope 1978;88:723–8.
Jackler RK, De La Cruz A. The large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Laryngoscope 1989;99:1238–42.
Levenson MJ, Parisier SC, Jacobs M, Edelstein DR. The large vestibular aqueduct syndrome in children: a review of 12 cases and the description of a new clinical entity. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:54–8.
Sennaroğlu L, Bajin MD. Classification and current management of inner ear malformations. Balkan Med J 2017;34:397–411.
Weissman JL. Hearing loss. Radiology 1996;199:593–611.
Boston M, Halsted M, Meinzen-Derr J, et al. The large vestibular aqueduct: a new definition based on audiologic and computed tomography correlation. Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2007;136:972–7.
Dahlen RT, Harnsberger HR, Gray SD, et al. Overlapping thin-section fast spin-echo MR of the large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:67–75.
Kobayashi M, Tsunoda A, Akita K, Yamada I. Estimation of the endolymphatic sac and vestibular aqueduct using magnetic resonance imaging. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1015–21.
Zalzal GH, Tomaski SM, Vezina LG, Bjornsti P, Grundfast KM. Enlarged vestibular aqueduct and sensorineural hearing loss in childhood. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:23–8.
Campbell AP, Adunka OF, Zhou B, Qaqish BF, Buchman CA. Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome: anatomic and functional parameters. Laryngoscope 2011;121:352–7.
Madden C, Halsted M, Benton C, Greinwald J, Choo D. Enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome in the pediatric population. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:625–32.
Naganawa S, Koshikawa T, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T, Nakashima T. Serial MR imaging studies in enlarged endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome. Eur Radiol 2002;12(S3):S114–7.
Colvin IB, Beale T, Harrop-Griffiths K. Long-term follow-up of hearing loss in children and young adults with enlarged vestibular aqueducts: relationship to radiologic findings and Pendred syndrome diagnosis. Laryngoscope 2006;116:2027–36.
Antonelli PJ, Nall AV, Lemmerling MM, Mancuso AA, Kubilis PS. Hearing loss with cochlear modiolar defects and large vestibular aqueducts. Am J Otol 1998;19:306–12.
Naganawa S, Koshikawa T, Iwayama E, et al. MR imaging of the enlarged endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome by use of a 3D fast asymmetric spin-echo sequence: volume and signal-intensity measurement of the endolymphatic duct and sac and area measurement of the cochlear modiolus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1664–9.
Lai CC, Shiao AS. Chronological changes of hearing in pediatric patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Laryngoscope 2004;114:832–8.
Lin CY, Lin SL, Kao CC, Wu JL. The remediation of hearing deterioration in children with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Auris Nasus Larynx 2005;32:99–105.
Deep NL, Carlson ML, Hoxworth JM, et al. Classifying the large vestibular aqueduct: morphometry to audiometry. Otol Neurotol 2023;44:47–53.
Sennaroglu L, Saatci I. A new classification for cochleovestibular malformations. Laryngoscope 2002;112:2230–41.
Bamiou DE. Temporal bone computed tomography findings in bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Arch Dis Child 2000;82:257–60.
Okumura T, Takahashi H, Honjo I, Mitamura K, Takagi A. Sensorineural hearing loss in patients with large vestibular aqueduct. Laryngoscope 1995;105:289–94.
Gopen Q, Zhou G, Whittemore K, Kenna M. Enlarged vestibular aqueduct: review of controversial aspects: enlarged vestibular aqueduct: controversies. Laryngoscope 2011;121:1971–8.
Arjmand EM, Webber A. Audiometric findings in children with a large vestibular aqueduct. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2004;130:1169–74.
Murray LN, Tanaka GJ, Cameron DS, Gianoli GJ. Coronal computed tomography of the normal vestibular aqueduct in children and young adults. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2000;126:1351–7.
Venema HW, Phoa SS, Mirck PG, et al. Petrosal bone: coronal reconstructions from axial spiral CT data obtained with 0.5-mm collimation can replace direct coronal sequential CT scans. Radiology 1999;213:375–82.
Okamoto K, Ito J, Furusawa T, et al. MRI of enlarged endolymphatic sacs in the large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Neuroradiology 1998;40:167–72.
Deep NL, Hoxworth JM, Barrs DM. What is the best imaging modality for diagnosing a large vestibular aqueduct?: large vestibular aqueduct imaging. Laryngoscope 2016;126:302–3.
Connor SEJ, Dudau C, Pai I, Gaganasiou M. Is CT or MRI the optimal imaging investigation for the diagnosis of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and large endolymphatic sac anomaly? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;276:693–702.
Clarke RL, Isaacson B, Kutz JW, Xi Y, Booth TN. MRI evaluation of the normal and abnormal endolymphatic duct in the pediatric population: a comparison with high-resolution CT. Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1865–9 Published online August 26, 2021:ajnr;ajnr.A7224v1.
Yang L, Liu J. Comparative analysis of CT and MRI diagnosis of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) in children. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2019;29:753–6.
Oehler MC, Schmalbrock P, Chakeres D, Kurucay S. Magnetic susceptibility artifacts on high-resolution MR of the temporal bone. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1135–43.
Deep NL, Carlson ML, Weindling SM, et al. Diagnosing large vestibular aqueduct: radiological review of high-resolution CT versus high-resolution volumetric MRI. Otol Neurotol 2017;38:948–55.
Walsh RM, Ayshford CA, Chavda SV, Proops DW. Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999;61:41–4.
Pyle G. Embryological development and large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1837–42.

Auteurs

Jurgita Ivanauskaite (J)

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Justina Ivanauskaite (J)

Animal Health IT, MSD Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.

Farnaz Matin-Mann (F)

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Anja Maria Giesemann (AM)

Institute for Interventional and Diagnostic Neuroradiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Thomas Lenarz (T)

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Anke Lesinski-Schiedat (A)

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Classifications MeSH