Home-based exercise program for people with residual disability following hospitalization for COVID-19: Randomized control trial.

COVID-19 Exercise Healthcare providers Teleconsultation

Journal

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine
ISSN: 1877-0665
Titre abrégé: Ann Phys Rehabil Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101502773

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 14 03 2023
revised: 27 11 2023
accepted: 28 11 2023
medline: 14 3 2024
pubmed: 14 3 2024
entrez: 13 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The best exercise program for individuals with effort intolerance or hypoxia at rest and/or during exercise post-COVID-19 treatment who have already had in-hospital rehabilitation remains unknown. We evaluated the efficacy of a home-based rehabilitation exercise program intervention that included teleconsultations with a specialist nurse. This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial for individuals who had been diagnosed with, and treated for, COVID-19. Despite inpatient rehabilitation they still had effort intolerance; this was defined as being a) only able to walk <70 % of the predicted distance during the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and/or b) oxygen desaturation all day long/during effort. The primary outcome was effort tolerance, as evaluated by the 6MWT. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, spirometry, respiratory muscle evaluations, and oxygenation. The Intervention group performed 4 weeks of a self-directed exercise program with bi-weekly physiotherapist video calls; the Control group participated in physical activity howsoever they wished. Exercises were divided into 4 intensity levels according to disability and oxygen desaturation. The program progressively increased from low (walking, free-body exercise, sit-to-stand, and balance exercises) to high (speed walking with a pedometer, cycle ergometer, and strengthening exercises). We included 79 participants: 40 in the Intervention and 39 in the Control group. Mean (SD) age was 67.1 (10.3) years; 72 % (n = 57) were male. No intergroup differences in effort tolerance were found [Intervention 77.6 (75.4)m vs Control 49.5 (73.3)m (p = 0.109)]. Participants with 6MWT distance results < lower limit of normality values showed best improvements in mean (SD) effort tolerance: Intervention, 120.1 (75.8)m vs Control, 59.1 (75.6)m (p = 0.035). After 2 months, mean (SD) 6MWT distances in the 2 groups were similar: Intervention, 475.9 (82.4)m vs Control, 469.2 (118.9)m (p = 0.807). In individuals with residual disability post-COVID-19 and after inpatient rehabilitation, a home-based exercise program with teleconsultation significantly improves effort tolerance but only for people who had severe effort intolerance at baseline. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04821934.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The best exercise program for individuals with effort intolerance or hypoxia at rest and/or during exercise post-COVID-19 treatment who have already had in-hospital rehabilitation remains unknown.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We evaluated the efficacy of a home-based rehabilitation exercise program intervention that included teleconsultations with a specialist nurse.
METHODS METHODS
This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial for individuals who had been diagnosed with, and treated for, COVID-19. Despite inpatient rehabilitation they still had effort intolerance; this was defined as being a) only able to walk <70 % of the predicted distance during the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and/or b) oxygen desaturation all day long/during effort. The primary outcome was effort tolerance, as evaluated by the 6MWT. Secondary outcomes were dyspnea, fatigue, spirometry, respiratory muscle evaluations, and oxygenation. The Intervention group performed 4 weeks of a self-directed exercise program with bi-weekly physiotherapist video calls; the Control group participated in physical activity howsoever they wished. Exercises were divided into 4 intensity levels according to disability and oxygen desaturation. The program progressively increased from low (walking, free-body exercise, sit-to-stand, and balance exercises) to high (speed walking with a pedometer, cycle ergometer, and strengthening exercises).
RESULTS RESULTS
We included 79 participants: 40 in the Intervention and 39 in the Control group. Mean (SD) age was 67.1 (10.3) years; 72 % (n = 57) were male. No intergroup differences in effort tolerance were found [Intervention 77.6 (75.4)m vs Control 49.5 (73.3)m (p = 0.109)]. Participants with 6MWT distance results < lower limit of normality values showed best improvements in mean (SD) effort tolerance: Intervention, 120.1 (75.8)m vs Control, 59.1 (75.6)m (p = 0.035). After 2 months, mean (SD) 6MWT distances in the 2 groups were similar: Intervention, 475.9 (82.4)m vs Control, 469.2 (118.9)m (p = 0.807).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In individuals with residual disability post-COVID-19 and after inpatient rehabilitation, a home-based exercise program with teleconsultation significantly improves effort tolerance but only for people who had severe effort intolerance at baseline.
DATABASE REGISTRATION UNASSIGNED
ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04821934.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38479344
pii: S1877-0657(23)00086-6
doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101815
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04821934']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101815

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose related to this manuscript.

Auteurs

Mara Paneroni (M)

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Cardio-Respiratory Rehabilitation Unit of the Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy. Electronic address: mara.paneroni@icsmaugeri.it.

Simonetta Scalvini (S)

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Cardiac Rehabilitation and Continuity of Care Units of Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy.

Elisa Perger (E)

Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Sleep Disorders Center & Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, San Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy; University of Milano Bicocca, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Milan, Italy.

Elisabetta Zampogna (E)

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation Unit of the Institute of Tradate, Varese, Italy.

Simone Govetto (S)

Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Sleep Disorders Center & Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, San Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Federico Mattia Oliva (FM)

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation Unit of the Institute of Tradate, Varese, Italy.

Ambra Matrone (A)

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Cardiac Rehabilitation and Continuity of Care Units of Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy.

Palmira Bernocchi (P)

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Cardiac Rehabilitation and Continuity of Care Units of Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy.

Debora Rosa (D)

Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Sleep Disorders Center & Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, San Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Michele Vitacca (M)

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation Unit of the Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy.

Classifications MeSH