Effect of deep learning-based reconstruction on high-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted fast asymmetric spin-echo imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cerebellopontine angle tumors.
Cerebellopontine angle tumors
Contrast-to-noise ratios
Deep learning-based reconstruction
Tumor nerve
Journal
Neuroradiology
ISSN: 1432-1920
Titre abrégé: Neuroradiology
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1302751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Mar 2024
14 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
17
11
2023
accepted:
04
03
2024
medline:
14
3
2024
pubmed:
14
3
2024
entrez:
14
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
We aimed to evaluate the effect of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) on high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted fast asymmetric spin-echo (HR-3D T2-FASE) imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. This study included 13 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative HR-3D T2-FASE imaging using a 3 T MRI scanner. The reconstruction voxel size of HR-3D T2-FASE imaging was 0.23 × 0.23 × 0.5 mm. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the structures were compared between HR-3D T2-FASE images with and without DLR. The observers' preferences based on four categories on the tumor side on HR-3D T2-FASE images were evaluated. The facial nerve in relation to the tumor on HR-3D T2-FASE images was assessed with reference to intraoperative findings. The mean CNR between the tumor and trigeminal nerve and between the cerebrospinal fluid and trigeminal nerve was significantly higher for DLR images than non-DLR-based images (14.3 ± 8.9 vs. 12.0 ± 7.6, and 66.4 ± 12.0 vs. 53.9 ± 8.5, P < 0.001, respectively). The observer's preference for the depiction and delineation of the tumor, cranial nerves, vessels, and location relation on DLR HR-3D T2FASE images was superior to that on non-DLR HR-3D T2FASE images in 7 (54%), 6 (46%), 6 (46%), and 6 (46%) of 13 cases, respectively. The facial nerves around the tumor on HR-3D T2-FASE images were visualized accurately in five (38%) cases with DLR and in four (31%) without DLR. DLR HR-3D T2-FASE imaging is useful for the preoperative assessment of CPA tumors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38480538
doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03328-9
pii: 10.1007/s00234-024-03328-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Churi ON, Gupta S, Misra BK (2019) Correlation of preoperative cranial nerve diffusion tensor tractography with intraoperative findings in surgery of cerebellopontine angle tumors. World Neurosurg 127:e509–e516
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.190
pubmed: 30928584
Naganawa S, Koshikawa T, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T, Fukuta T (2001) MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional fast asymmetrical spin-echo and three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady-state sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22(6):1179–1185
pubmed: 11415916
pmcid: 7974806
Kanoto M, Toyoguchi Y, Hosoya T, Oda A, Sugai Y (2013) Visualization of the trochlear nerve in the cistern with use of high-resolution turbo spin-echo multisection motion-sensitized driven equilibrium. Am J Neuroradiol 34(7):1434–1437
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3403
pubmed: 23391840
pmcid: 8051488
Aja-Fernandez S, Vegas-Sanchez-Ferrero G, Tristan-Vega A (2014) Noise estimation in parallel MRI: GRAPPA and SENSE. Magn Reson Imaging 32(3):281–290
doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.12.001
pubmed: 24418329
Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42(5):952–962
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199911)42:5<952::AID-MRM16>3.0.CO;2-S
pubmed: 10542355
Mönch S, Sollmann N, Hock A, Zimmer C, Kirschke JS, Hedderich DM (2020) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain using compressed sensing – quality assessment in daily clinical routine. Clin Neuroradiol 30(2):279–286
doi: 10.1007/s00062-019-00789-x
pubmed: 31098666
Zhang T, Chowdhury S, Lustig M, Barth RA, Alley MT, Grafendorfer T, Calderon PD, Robb FJL, Pauly JM, Vasanawala SS (2014) Clinical performance of contrast enhanced abdominal pediatric MRI with fast combined parallel imaging compressed sensing reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging 40(1):13–25
doi: 10.1002/jmri.24333
pubmed: 24127123
Sharma SD, Fong CL, Tzung BS, Law M, Nayak KS (2013) Clinical image quality assessment of accelerated magnetic resonance neuroimaging using compressed sensing. Invest Radiol 48(9):638–645
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31828a012d
pubmed: 23538890
Zhang K, Zuo W, Chen Y, Meng D, Zhang L (2017) Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(7):3142–3155
doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206
pubmed: 28166495
Jiang D, Dou W, Vosters L, Xu X, Sun Y, Tan T (2018) Denoising of 3D magnetic resonance images with multi-channel residual learning of convolutional neural network. Jpn J Radiol 36(9):566–574
doi: 10.1007/s11604-018-0758-8
pubmed: 29982919
Kidoh M, Shinoda K, Kitajima M, Isogawa K, Nambu M, Uetani H, Morita K, Nakaura T, Tateishi M, Yamashita Y, Yamashita Y (2020) Deep learning based noise reduction for brain MR imaging: tests on phantoms and healthy volunteers. Magn Reson Med Sci 19(3):195–206
doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0018
pubmed: 31484849
Uetani H, Nakaura T, Kitajima M, Yamashita Y, Hamasaki T, Tateishi M, Morita K, Sasao A, Oda S, Ikeda O, Yamashita Y (2021) A preliminary study of deep learning-based reconstruction specialized for denoising in high-frequency domain: usefulness in high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle. Neuroradiology 63(1):63–71
doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02513-w
pubmed: 32794075
Fischbach F, Muller M, Bruhn H (2009) High-resolution depiction of the cranial nerves in the posterior fossa (N III-N XII) with 2D fast spin echo and 3D gradient echo sequences at 3.0 T. Clin Imaging 33(3):169–174
doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.09.012
pubmed: 19411020
Sampath P, Rini D, Long DM (2000) Microanatomical variations in the cerebellopontine angle associated with vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): a retrospective study of 1006 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 92(1):70–78
doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.92.1.0070
pubmed: 10616085
Uetani H, Nakaura T, Kitajima M, Morita K, Haraoka K, Shinojima N, Tateishi M, Inoue T, Sasao A, Mukasa A, Azuma M, Ikeda O, Yamashita Y, Hirai T (2022) Hybrid deep-learning-based denoising method for compressed sensing in pituitary MRI: comparison with the conventional wavelet-based denoising method. Eur Radiol 32(7):4527–4536
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08552-6
pubmed: 35169896
Sartoretti-Schefer S, Kollias S, Valavanis A (2000) Spatial relationship between vestibular schwannoma and facial nerve on three-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21(5):810–816
pubmed: 10815653
pmcid: 7976768
Shigematsu Y, Korogi Y, Hirai T, Okuda T, Ikushima I, Sugahara T, Liang L, Takahashi M (1999) Contrast-enhanced CISS MRI of vestibular schwannomas: phantom and clinical studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23(2):224–231
doi: 10.1097/00004728-199903000-00010
pubmed: 10096329
Mikami T, Minamida Y, Yamaki T, Koyanagi I, Nonaka T, Houkin K (2005) Cranial nerve assessment in posterior fossa tumors with fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA). Neurosurg Rev 28(4):261–266
doi: 10.1007/s10143-005-0394-5
pubmed: 15933875