Effects of different traditional Chinese exercise in the treatment of essential hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Baduanjin Tai Chi essential hypertension network meta-analysis systematic review traditional Chinese exercise

Journal

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 23 09 2023
accepted: 19 02 2024
medline: 14 3 2024
pubmed: 14 3 2024
entrez: 14 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

As a therapy to prevent and treat essential hypertension (EH), traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) were widely used in clinical practice. However, there is a lack of strictly comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy of different TCEs, which not conducive to the selection of the best and most optimal treatment. This study aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to objectively evaluate which TCE has the best effects in assisting with lowering blood pressure. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, SinoMed and Wanfang Data were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TCEs for the treatment of EH published up to July 10, 2023. RoB2.0 tool was utilized to evaluate the quality of the RCTs. The network meta-analysis was performed by R 4.1.2 and Stata 17.0. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated for continuous outcomes. A total of 29 studies, including 2,268 patients were included to analyze 6 different interventions. The network meta-analysis results presented that in comparison with control group, Tai Chi + antihypertensive medication [WMD = -10.18, 95% CI, (-14.94, -5.44)] is the most effective intervention for lowering systolic blood pressure (SBP), and Wuqinxi + antihypertensive medication [WMD = -10.36, 95% CI (-18.98, -1.66)] is the most effective intervention for lowering diastolic blood pressure (DBP). TCEs combined with antihypertensive medication may be able to achieve more prominent antihypertensive effects with Tai Chi and Wuqinxi potentially being the higher-priority options. However, well-designed randomized studies are warranted to further verify currently conclusion.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
As a therapy to prevent and treat essential hypertension (EH), traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) were widely used in clinical practice. However, there is a lack of strictly comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy of different TCEs, which not conducive to the selection of the best and most optimal treatment. This study aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to objectively evaluate which TCE has the best effects in assisting with lowering blood pressure.
Methods UNASSIGNED
PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, SinoMed and Wanfang Data were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TCEs for the treatment of EH published up to July 10, 2023. RoB2.0 tool was utilized to evaluate the quality of the RCTs. The network meta-analysis was performed by R 4.1.2 and Stata 17.0. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated for continuous outcomes.
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 29 studies, including 2,268 patients were included to analyze 6 different interventions. The network meta-analysis results presented that in comparison with control group, Tai Chi + antihypertensive medication [WMD = -10.18, 95% CI, (-14.94, -5.44)] is the most effective intervention for lowering systolic blood pressure (SBP), and Wuqinxi + antihypertensive medication [WMD = -10.36, 95% CI (-18.98, -1.66)] is the most effective intervention for lowering diastolic blood pressure (DBP).
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
TCEs combined with antihypertensive medication may be able to achieve more prominent antihypertensive effects with Tai Chi and Wuqinxi potentially being the higher-priority options. However, well-designed randomized studies are warranted to further verify currently conclusion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38481952
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1300319
pmc: PMC10935740
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

1300319

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Zhang, Xu, Wu, Zhang, Huang, Wu, Tian and Zhang.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Qingyuan Zhang (Q)

College of Traditional Chinese Medicine and College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Evidence-Based Medicine Research Center, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Xiaogang Xu (X)

College of Traditional Chinese Medicine and College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Qianyan Wu (Q)

College of Traditional Chinese Medicine and College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Jingwen Zhang (J)

College of Traditional Chinese Medicine and College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Shenghe Huang (S)

College of Traditional Chinese Medicine and College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Lin Wu (L)

College of Traditional Chinese Medicine and College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Minping Tian (M)

School of Clinical Medicine, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Delin Zhang (D)

College of Traditional Chinese Medicine and College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Health Development, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Classifications MeSH