Development of a palliative paramedicine framework to standardise best practice: A Delphi study.

Delphi methods Palliative care consensus development emergency medical services paramedic terminal care

Journal

Palliative medicine
ISSN: 1477-030X
Titre abrégé: Palliat Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 14 3 2024
pubmed: 14 3 2024
entrez: 14 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Growing global demand for palliative care services has prompted generalist clinicians to provide adjunct support to specialist teams. Paramedics are uniquely placed to respond to these patients in the community. However, embedding palliative care principles into their core business will require multifactorial interventions at structural, healthcare service and individual clinician and consumer levels. To develop a palliative paramedicine framework suitable for national implementation, to standardise best practice in Australia. Delphi study utilising questionnaire completion; each round informed the need for, and content of, the next round. Free text comments were also sought in Round 1. Two rounds of Delphi were undertaken. Sixty-eight participants took part in Round 1, representing six countries, and 66 in Round 2. Participants included paramedics, palliative care doctors and nurses, general practitioners, researchers and carers with lived experience and expertise in palliative paramedicine. Seventeen of the original 24 components gained consensus; 6 components were modified; and 9 new components arose from Round 1. All modified and new components gained consensus in Round 2. Only one original component did not gain consensus across both rounds and was excluded from the final 32-component framework. This study has developed a comprehensive national framework addressing the macro-, meso- and micro-level interventions required to standardise palliative paramedicine across Australia. Future research ought to engage a multidisciplinary team to create an implementation strategy, addressing any perceived barriers, facilitators and challenges for applying the framework into policy and practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Growing global demand for palliative care services has prompted generalist clinicians to provide adjunct support to specialist teams. Paramedics are uniquely placed to respond to these patients in the community. However, embedding palliative care principles into their core business will require multifactorial interventions at structural, healthcare service and individual clinician and consumer levels.
AIM UNASSIGNED
To develop a palliative paramedicine framework suitable for national implementation, to standardise best practice in Australia.
DESIGN UNASSIGNED
Delphi study utilising questionnaire completion; each round informed the need for, and content of, the next round. Free text comments were also sought in Round 1. Two rounds of Delphi were undertaken.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS UNASSIGNED
Sixty-eight participants took part in Round 1, representing six countries, and 66 in Round 2. Participants included paramedics, palliative care doctors and nurses, general practitioners, researchers and carers with lived experience and expertise in palliative paramedicine.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Seventeen of the original 24 components gained consensus; 6 components were modified; and 9 new components arose from Round 1. All modified and new components gained consensus in Round 2. Only one original component did not gain consensus across both rounds and was excluded from the final 32-component framework.
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
This study has developed a comprehensive national framework addressing the macro-, meso- and micro-level interventions required to standardise palliative paramedicine across Australia. Future research ought to engage a multidisciplinary team to create an implementation strategy, addressing any perceived barriers, facilitators and challenges for applying the framework into policy and practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38483052
doi: 10.1177/02692163241234004
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2692163241234004

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Madeleine L Juhrmann (ML)

Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
The Palliative Centre, HammondCare, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Phyllis N Butow (PN)

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Paul Simpson (P)

School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
New South Wales Ambulance, Rozelle, NSW, Australia.

Mark Boughey (M)

Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.

Meredith Makeham (M)

Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Josephine M Clayton (JM)

Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
The Palliative Centre, HammondCare, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Classifications MeSH