Dual Layer vs Single Layer Woven EndoBridge Device in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Aneurysms
Intracranial
WEB
Woven EndoBridge, treatment
Journal
Neurosurgical review
ISSN: 1437-2320
Titre abrégé: Neurosurg Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7908181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Mar 2024
14 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
10
11
2023
accepted:
03
03
2024
revised:
26
02
2024
medline:
18
3
2024
pubmed:
14
3
2024
entrez:
14
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) devices have been used for treating wide neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) with several generational enhancements to improve clinical outcomes. The original device dual-layer (WEB DL) was replaced by a single-layer (WEB SL) device in 2013. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of these devices in managing intracranial aneurysms. A multicenter cohort study was conducted, and data from 1,289 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with either the WEB SL or WEB DL devices were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Outcomes assessed included immediate occlusion rate, complete occlusion at last follow-up, retreatment rate, device compaction, and aneurysmal rupture. Before propensity score matching, patients treated with the WEB SL had a significantly higher rate of complete occlusion at the last follow-up and a lower rate of retreatment. After matching, there was no significant difference in immediate occlusion rate, retreatment rate, or device compaction between the WEB SL and DL groups. However, the SL group maintained a higher rate of complete occlusion at the final follow-up. Regression analysis showed that SL was associated with higher rates of complete occlusion (OR: 0.19; CI: 0.04 to 0.8, p = 0.029) and lower rates of retreatment (OR: 0.12; CI: 0 to 4.12, p = 0.23). The WEB SL and DL devices demonstrated similar performances in immediate occlusion rates and retreatment requirements for intracranial aneurysms. The SL device showed a higher rate of complete occlusion at the final follow-up.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) devices have been used for treating wide neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) with several generational enhancements to improve clinical outcomes. The original device dual-layer (WEB DL) was replaced by a single-layer (WEB SL) device in 2013. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of these devices in managing intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS
METHODS
A multicenter cohort study was conducted, and data from 1,289 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with either the WEB SL or WEB DL devices were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching was utilized to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Outcomes assessed included immediate occlusion rate, complete occlusion at last follow-up, retreatment rate, device compaction, and aneurysmal rupture.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Before propensity score matching, patients treated with the WEB SL had a significantly higher rate of complete occlusion at the last follow-up and a lower rate of retreatment. After matching, there was no significant difference in immediate occlusion rate, retreatment rate, or device compaction between the WEB SL and DL groups. However, the SL group maintained a higher rate of complete occlusion at the final follow-up. Regression analysis showed that SL was associated with higher rates of complete occlusion (OR: 0.19; CI: 0.04 to 0.8, p = 0.029) and lower rates of retreatment (OR: 0.12; CI: 0 to 4.12, p = 0.23).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The WEB SL and DL devices demonstrated similar performances in immediate occlusion rates and retreatment requirements for intracranial aneurysms. The SL device showed a higher rate of complete occlusion at the final follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38483647
doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02341-z
pii: 10.1007/s10143-024-02341-z
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Goyal N, Hoit D, DiNitto J et al (2020) How to WEB: a practical review of methodology for the use of the Woven EndoBridge. J Neurointerv Surg 12(5):512–520. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015506
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015506
pubmed: 32005760
pmcid: 7231463
Ding YH, Lewis DA, Kadirvel R, Dai D, Kallmes DF (2011) The Woven EndoBridge: a new aneurysm occlusion device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(3):607–611. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2399
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2399
pubmed: 21330397
pmcid: 8013102
Papagiannaki C, Spelle L, Januel AC et al (2014) WEB intrasaccular flow disruptor-prospective, multicenter experience in 83 patients with 85 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35(11):2106–2111. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4028
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4028
pubmed: 24994823
pmcid: 7965185
Dmytriw AA, Salem MM, Yang VXD et al (2020) Endosaccular Flow Disruption: A New Frontier in Endovascular Aneurysm Management. Neurosurgery 86(2):170–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz017
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz017
pubmed: 30834934
Gawlitza M, Soize S, Januel AC et al (2018) Treatment of recurrent aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge (WEB): anatomical and clinical results. J Neurointerv Surg 10(7):629–633. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013287
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013287
pubmed: 29054913
Goertz L, Liebig T, Siebert E et al (2019) Extending the Indication of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Embolization to Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Multicenter Safety and Feasibility Study. World Neurosurg 126:e965–e974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.198
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.198
pubmed: 30876989
Adeeb N, Dibas M, Diestro JDB et al (2023) Comparing treatment outcomes of various intracranial bifurcation aneurysms locations using the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device. J Neurointerv Surg 15(6):558–565. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018694
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018694
pubmed: 35483912
Mine B, Pierot L, Lubicz B (2014) Intrasaccular flow-diversion for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the Woven EndoBridge. Expert Rev Med Devices 11(3):315–325. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2014.907741
doi: 10.1586/17434440.2014.907741
pubmed: 24694000
Pierot L, Costalat V, Moret J et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg 124(5):1250–1256. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.2.JNS142634
doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS142634
pubmed: 26381253
Pierot L, Gubucz I, Buhk JH et al (2017) Safety and Efficacy of Aneurysm Treatment with the WEB: Results of the WEBCAST 2 Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38(6):1151–1155. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5178
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5178
pubmed: 28450432
pmcid: 7960101
Pierot L, Moret J, Turjman F et al (2015) WEB Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Feasibility, Complications, and 1-Month Safety Results with the WEB DL and WEB SL/SLS in the French Observatory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(5):922–927. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4230
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4230
pubmed: 25655876
pmcid: 7990613
Arthur AS, Molyneux A, Coon AL et al (2019) The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) Study. J Neurointerv Surg 11(9):924–930. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014815
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014815
pubmed: 30992395
pmcid: 6824604
K EN, P M, N A, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Cerebral Aneurysms Completely Occluded at 6 Months After Intervention with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Device: a Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study. Trans Stroke Res. Published online May 11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-023-01153-5
Dmytriw AA, Dibas M, Ghozy S et al (2023) The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Ten Years of Lessons Learned and Adjustments in Practice from the WorldWideWEB Consortium. Transl Stroke Res 14(4):455–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-022-01072-x
doi: 10.1007/s12975-022-01072-x
pubmed: 36066701
Diestro JDB, Dibas M, Adeeb N, et al. Intrasaccular flow disruption for ruptured aneurysms: an international multicenter study. J Neurointerv Surg. Published online July 22, 2022:neurintsurg-2022–019153. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2022-019153
Adeeb N, Dibas M, Diestro JDB et al (2022) Multicenter Study for the Treatment of Sidewall versus Bifurcation Intracranial Aneurysms with Use of Woven EndoBridge (WEB). Radiology 304(2):372–382. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.212006
doi: 10.1148/radiol.212006
pubmed: 35438564
Dibas M, Adeeb N, Diestro JDB, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral access for embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device: a propensity score-matched study. J Neurosurg. Published online February 4, 2022:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.12.JNS212293
Dmytriw AA, Musmar B, Salim H, et al. The impact of postoperative aspirin in patients undergoing Woven EndoBridge: a multicenter, institutional, propensity score-matched analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Jan 18:jnis-2023–021082. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-021082 . Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38238006.
Klisch J, Sychra V, Strasilla C, Liebig T, Fiorella D (2011) The Woven EndoBridge cerebral aneurysm embolization device (WEB II): initial clinical experience. Neuroradiology 53(8):599–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0891-x
doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-0891-x
pubmed: 21617885
Bozzetto Ambrosi P, Gory B, Sivan-Hoffmann R et al (2015) Endovascular treatment of bifurcation intracranial aneurysms with the WEB SL/SLS: 6-month clinical and angiographic results. Interv Neuroradiol 21(4):462–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019915590083
doi: 10.1177/1591019915590083
pubmed: 26111987
pmcid: 4757321
Behme D, Berlis A, Weber W (2015) Woven EndoBridge Intrasaccular Flow Disrupter for the Treatment of Ruptured and Unruptured Wide-Neck Cerebral Aneurysms: Report of 55 Cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(8):1501–1506. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4323
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4323
pubmed: 25953761
pmcid: 7964697
Caroff J, Mihalea C, Klisch J et al (2015) Single-Layer WEBs: Intrasaccular Flow Disrupters for Aneurysm Treatment—Feasibility Results from a European Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(10):1942–1946. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4369
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4369
pubmed: 26159516
pmcid: 7965028
Da Ros V, Bozzi A, Comelli C et al (2019) Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Woven Endobridge Intrasaccular Flow Disruptor: A Multicenter Experience. World Neurosurg 122:e498–e505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.088
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.088
pubmed: 30394356
Clajus C, Strasilla C, Fiebig T, Sychra V, Fiorella D, Klisch J (2017) Initial and mid-term results from 108 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the WEB device. J Neurointerv Surg 9(4):411–417. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012276
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012276
pubmed: 27075486
Popielski J, Berlis A, Weber W, Fischer S (2018) Two-Center Experience in the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using the WEB Device: A Retrospective Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39(1):111–117. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5413
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5413
pubmed: 29051205
pmcid: 7410711
Raj R, Rautio R, Pekkola J, Rahi M, Sillanpää M, Numminen J (2019) Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using the Woven EndoBridge Device: A Two-Center Experience. World Neurosurg 123:e709–e716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.010
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.010
pubmed: 30576812
van Rooij SB, van Rooij WJ, Peluso JP, Sluzewski M (2018) The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) as primary treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 24(5):475–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019918772174
doi: 10.1177/1591019918772174
pubmed: 29768963
pmcid: 6116134
van Rooij S, Sprengers M, Peluso J et al (2020) A systematic review and meta-analysis of Woven EndoBridge single layer for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 26(4):455–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019920904421
doi: 10.1177/1591019920904421
pubmed: 32028824
pmcid: 7446584
Armoiry X, Turjman F, Hartmann DJ et al (2016) Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with the WEB Device: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(5):868–872. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4611
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4611
pubmed: 26585260
pmcid: 7960317
Asnafi S, Rouchaud A, Pierot L, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Kallmes DF (2016) Efficacy and Safety of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(12):2287–2292. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4900
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4900
pubmed: 27516237
pmcid: 7963876
Tau N, Sadeh-Gonik U, Aulagner G, Turjman F, Gory B, Armoiry X (2018) The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for endovascular therapy of intracranial aneurysms: Update of a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 166:110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.025
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.025
pubmed: 29408767
Lv X, Zhang Y, Jiang W (2018) Systematic Review of Woven EndoBridge for Wide-Necked Bifurcation Aneurysms: Complications, Adequate Occlusion Rate, Morbidity, and Mortality. World Neurosurg 110:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.113
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.113
pubmed: 29107726