Current trends and barriers to video management and analytics as a tool for surgeon skilling.
Education
Intraoperative video
Survey
Touch Surgery Enterprise
Video recording
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Mar 2024
14 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
07
11
2023
accepted:
15
02
2024
medline:
15
3
2024
pubmed:
15
3
2024
entrez:
15
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The benefits of intraoperative recording are well published in the literature; however, few studies have identified current practices, barriers, and subsequent solutions. The objective of this study was to better understand surgeon's current practices and perceptions of video management and gather blinded feedback on a new surgical video recording product with the potential to address these barriers effectively. A structured questionnaire was used to survey 230 surgeons (general, gynecologic, and urologic) and hospital administrators across the US and Europe regarding their current video recording practices. The same questionnaire was used to evaluate a blinded concept describing a new intraoperative recording solution. 54% of respondents reported recording eligible cases, with the majority recording less than 35% of their total eligible caseload. Reasons for not recording included finding no value in recording simple procedures, forgetting to record, lack of access to equipment, legal concerns, labor intensity, and difficulty accessing videos. Among non-recording surgeons, 65% reported considering recording cases to assess surgical techniques, document practice, submit to conferences, share with colleagues, and aid in training. 35% of surgeons rejected recording due to medico-legal concerns, lack of perceived benefit, concerns about secure storage, and price. Regarding the concept of a recording solution, 74% of all respondents were very likely or quite likely to recommend the product for adoption at their facility. Appealing features to current recorders included the product's ease of use, use of AI to maintain patient and staff privacy, lack of manual downloads, availability of full-length procedural videos, and ease of access and storage. Non-recorders found the immediate access to videos and maintenance of patient/staff privacy appealing. Tools that address barriers to recording, accessing, and managing surgical case videos are critical for improving surgical skills. Touch Surgery Enterprise is a valuable tool that can help overcome these barriers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The benefits of intraoperative recording are well published in the literature; however, few studies have identified current practices, barriers, and subsequent solutions. The objective of this study was to better understand surgeon's current practices and perceptions of video management and gather blinded feedback on a new surgical video recording product with the potential to address these barriers effectively.
METHODS
METHODS
A structured questionnaire was used to survey 230 surgeons (general, gynecologic, and urologic) and hospital administrators across the US and Europe regarding their current video recording practices. The same questionnaire was used to evaluate a blinded concept describing a new intraoperative recording solution.
RESULTS
RESULTS
54% of respondents reported recording eligible cases, with the majority recording less than 35% of their total eligible caseload. Reasons for not recording included finding no value in recording simple procedures, forgetting to record, lack of access to equipment, legal concerns, labor intensity, and difficulty accessing videos. Among non-recording surgeons, 65% reported considering recording cases to assess surgical techniques, document practice, submit to conferences, share with colleagues, and aid in training. 35% of surgeons rejected recording due to medico-legal concerns, lack of perceived benefit, concerns about secure storage, and price. Regarding the concept of a recording solution, 74% of all respondents were very likely or quite likely to recommend the product for adoption at their facility. Appealing features to current recorders included the product's ease of use, use of AI to maintain patient and staff privacy, lack of manual downloads, availability of full-length procedural videos, and ease of access and storage. Non-recorders found the immediate access to videos and maintenance of patient/staff privacy appealing.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Tools that address barriers to recording, accessing, and managing surgical case videos are critical for improving surgical skills. Touch Surgery Enterprise is a valuable tool that can help overcome these barriers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38485783
doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10754-6
pii: 10.1007/s00464-024-10754-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
St John A, Caturegli I, Kubicki NS, Kavic SM (2020) The rise of minimally invasive surgery: 16 year analysis of the progressive replacement of open surgery with laparoscopy. JSLS 24(4):e2020.00076. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00076
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00076
pubmed: 33510568
pmcid: 7810432
Thia BC, Wong NJ, Sheth SJ (2019) Video recording in ophthalmic surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 64(4):570–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.01.005
pubmed: 30703406
Brennan HL, Kirby SD (2023) Intraoperative video recording in otolaryngology for surgical education: evolution and considerations. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 52(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00620-1
doi: 10.1186/s40463-023-00620-1
pubmed: 36658628
pmcid: 9851573
Karam MD, Thomas GW, Taylor L, Liu X, Anthony CA, Anderson DD (2016) Value added: the case for point-of-view camera use in orthopedic surgical education. Iowa Orthop J 36:7–12
pubmed: 27528828
pmcid: 4910800
Jones DB, Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR et al (2017) SAGES University MASTERS Program: a structured curriculum for deliberate, lifelong learning. Surg Endosc 31(8):3061–3071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5626-6
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5626-6
pubmed: 28634631
Bittner JG, Logghe HJ, Kane ED et al (2019) A Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) statement on closed social media (Facebook®) groups for clinical education and consultation: issues of informed consent, patient privacy, and surgeon protection. Surg Endosc 33(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6569-2
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6569-2
pubmed: 30421077
Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Gordon LE, Grantcharov TP (2015) Comprehensive surgical coaching enhances surgical skill in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 262(2):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001214
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001214
pubmed: 25822691
Augestad KM, Butt K, Ignjatovic D, Keller DS, Kiran R (2020) Video-based coaching in surgical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 34(2):521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07265-0
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07265-0
pubmed: 31748927
van de Graaf FW, Lange MM, Spakman JI et al (2019) Comparison of systematic video documentation with narrative operative report in colorectal cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 154(5):381. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5246
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5246
pubmed: 30673072
pmcid: 6537773
Chhabra KR, Thumma JR, Varban OA, Dimick JB (2021) Associations between video evaluations of surgical technique and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. JAMA Surg 156(2):e205532. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5532
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5532
pubmed: 33325998
Fecso AB, Bhatti JA, Stotland PK, Quereshy FA, Grantcharov TP (2019) Technical performance as a predictor of clinical outcomes in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. Ann Surg 270(1):115–120. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002741
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002741
pubmed: 29578907
Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A et al (2013) Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 369(15):1434–1442. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1300625
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1300625
pubmed: 24106936
Curtis NJ, Foster JD, Miskovic D et al (2020) Association of surgical skill assessment with clinical outcomes in cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 155(7):590. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1004
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1004
pubmed: 32374371
Esposito AC, Coppersmith NA, White EM, Yoo PS (2022) Video coaching in surgical education: utility, opportunities, and barriers to implementation. J Surg Educ 79(3):717–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.12.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.12.004
pubmed: 34972670
Mazer L, Varban O, Montgomery JR, Awad MM, Schulman A (2022) Video is better: why aren’t we using it? A mixed-methods study of the barriers to routine procedural video recording and case review. Surg Endosc 36(2):1090–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08375-4
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08375-4
pubmed: 33616730
Stulberg JJ, Huang R, Kreutzer L et al (2020) Association between surgeon technical skills and patient outcomes. JAMA Surg 155(10):960. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3007
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3007
pubmed: 32838425
pmcid: 7439214
Greenberg CC, Byrnes ME, Engler TA, Quamme SPR, Thumma JR, Dimick JB (2021) Association of a statewide surgical coaching program with clinical outcomes and surgeon perceptions. Ann Surg 273(6):1034–1039. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004800
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004800
pubmed: 33605579
Stefanidis D, Anderson-Montoya B, Higgins RV et al (2016) Developing a coaching mechanism for practicing surgeons. Surgery 160(3):536–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.03.036
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.03.036
pubmed: 27302107
DuploCloud (2022) 5 HIPAA compliant cloud storage options for modern healthcare businesses. https://duplocloud.com/blog/hipaa-compliant-cloud-storage/ . Accessed 18 Jan 2024
Henken KR, Jansen FW, Klein J, Stassen LPS, Dankelman J, Van Den Dobbelsteen JJ (2012) Implications of the law on video recording in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 26(10):2909–2916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2284-6
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2284-6
pubmed: 22538690
Eryigit Ö, Van De Graaf FW, Nieuwenhuijs VB et al (2020) Association of video completed by audio in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with improvements in operative reporting. JAMA Surg 155(7):617. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0741
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0741
pubmed: 32432660
Dimick JB, Scott JW (2019) A video is worth a thousand operative notes. JAMA Surg 154(5):389. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5247
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5247
pubmed: 30673061
Prigoff JG, Sherwin M, Divino CM (2016) Ethical recommendations for video recording in the operating room. Ann Surg 264(1):34–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001652
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001652
pubmed: 27123809
Dalen ASHM, Legemaate J, Schlack WS, Legemate DA, Schijven MP (2019) Legal perspectives on black box recording devices in the operating environment. Br J Surg 106(11):1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11198
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11198
pubmed: 31112294
Hoschtitzky JA, Trivedi DB, Elliott MJ (2009) Saved by the video: added value of recording surgical procedures on video. Ann Thorac Surg 87(3):940–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.111
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.111
pubmed: 19231429