Enhancing seafood traceability: tracking the origin of seabass and seabream from the tuscan coast area by the analysis of the gill bacterial communities.
Journal
Animal microbiome
ISSN: 2524-4671
Titre abrégé: Anim Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101759457
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Mar 2024
14 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
02
11
2023
accepted:
04
03
2024
medline:
15
3
2024
pubmed:
15
3
2024
entrez:
15
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The seafood consumption and trade have increased over the years, and along its expected expansion pose major challenges to the seafood industry and government institutions. In particular, the global trade in fish products and the consequent consumption are linked to reliable authentication, necessary to guarantee lawful trade and healthy consumption. Alterations or errors in this process can lead to commercial fraud and/or health threats. Consequently, the development of new investigative tools became crucial in ensuring unwanted scenarios. Here we used NGS techniques through targeted metagenomics approach on the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA genes to characterize the gill bacterial communities in wild-caught seabream (Sparus aurata) and seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) within different fisheries areas of the "Costa degli Etruschi'' area in the Tuscan coast. Our challenge involved the possibility of discriminating between the microbiota of both fish species collected from three different fishing sites very close to each other (all within 100 km) in important areas from a commercial and tourist point of view. Our results showed a significant difference in the assembly of gill bacterial communities in terms of diversity (alpha and beta diversity) of both seabass and seabream in accordance with the three fishing areas. These differences were represented by a unique site -related bacterial signature, more evident in seabream compared to the seabass. Accordingly, the core membership of seabream specimens within the three different sites was minimal compared to the seabass which showed a greater number of sequence variants shared among the different fishing sites. Therefore, the LRT analysis highlighted the possibility of obtaining specific fish bacterial signatures associated with each site; it is noteworthy that specific taxa showed a unique association with the fishing site regardless of the fish species. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of target-metagenomic sequencing of gills in discriminating bacterial signatures of specimens collected from fishing areas located at a limited distance to each other. This study provides new information relating the structure of the gill microbiota of seabass and seabream in a fishing area with a crucial commercial and tourist interest, namely "Costa degli Etruschi". This study demonstrated that microbiome-based approaches can represent an important tool for validating the seafood origins with a central applicative perspective in the seafood traceability system.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The seafood consumption and trade have increased over the years, and along its expected expansion pose major challenges to the seafood industry and government institutions. In particular, the global trade in fish products and the consequent consumption are linked to reliable authentication, necessary to guarantee lawful trade and healthy consumption. Alterations or errors in this process can lead to commercial fraud and/or health threats. Consequently, the development of new investigative tools became crucial in ensuring unwanted scenarios. Here we used NGS techniques through targeted metagenomics approach on the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA genes to characterize the gill bacterial communities in wild-caught seabream (Sparus aurata) and seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) within different fisheries areas of the "Costa degli Etruschi'' area in the Tuscan coast. Our challenge involved the possibility of discriminating between the microbiota of both fish species collected from three different fishing sites very close to each other (all within 100 km) in important areas from a commercial and tourist point of view.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our results showed a significant difference in the assembly of gill bacterial communities in terms of diversity (alpha and beta diversity) of both seabass and seabream in accordance with the three fishing areas. These differences were represented by a unique site -related bacterial signature, more evident in seabream compared to the seabass. Accordingly, the core membership of seabream specimens within the three different sites was minimal compared to the seabass which showed a greater number of sequence variants shared among the different fishing sites. Therefore, the LRT analysis highlighted the possibility of obtaining specific fish bacterial signatures associated with each site; it is noteworthy that specific taxa showed a unique association with the fishing site regardless of the fish species. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of target-metagenomic sequencing of gills in discriminating bacterial signatures of specimens collected from fishing areas located at a limited distance to each other.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides new information relating the structure of the gill microbiota of seabass and seabream in a fishing area with a crucial commercial and tourist interest, namely "Costa degli Etruschi". This study demonstrated that microbiome-based approaches can represent an important tool for validating the seafood origins with a central applicative perspective in the seafood traceability system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38486253
doi: 10.1186/s42523-024-00300-z
pii: 10.1186/s42523-024-00300-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
13Subventions
Organisme : Regione Toscana with the project PO FEAMP 2014 - 2020 - Misura 1.39 SSL FLAG Costa degli Etruschi
ID : Project code: 2/SSL/16/TO-1/ICR/21/TO
Organisme : European Commission by FishEUTrust project Horizon-CL6-2021-FARM2FORK 01
ID : grant n. 101060712
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
The State. Of World fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. FAO; 2022.
Leal MC, Pimentel T, Ricardo F, Rosa R, Calado R. Seafood traceability: current needs, available tools, and biotechnological challenges for origin certification. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(6):331–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.03.003
pubmed: 25865857
Aung MM, Chang YS. Traceability in a food supply chain. Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control. 2014;39:172–84.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.11.007
Hoque MZ, Akhter N, Chowdhury MSR. Consumers’ preferences for the Traceability Information of Seafood Safety. Foods. 2022;11(12):1675.
doi: 10.3390/foods11121675
pubmed: 35741871
pmcid: 9222864
Denham FC, Howieson JR, Solah VA, Biswas WK. Environmental supply chain management in the seafood industry past, present and future approaches. J Clean Prod. 2015;90:82–90.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.079
Bailey M, Bush SR, Miller A, Kochen M. The role of traceability in transforming seafood governance in the global South. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2016;18:25–32.
doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.004
Parlapani FF. Microbial diversity of seafood. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2021;37:45–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.09.005
Anagnostopoulos DA, Syropoulou F, Parlapani FF, Tsiartsafis A, Exadactylos A, Nychas GJE, et al. Microbiota profile of filleted gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) during storage at various conditions by 16S rRNA metabarcoding analysis. Food Res Int. 2023;164:112312.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112312
pubmed: 36737906
Piredda R, Mottola A, Lorusso L, Ranieri L, Catanese G, Cipriano G, et al. Microbiome-based study in wild-caught Scomber scombrus fish products at the end of the supply chain. LWT. 2023;186:115264.
doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115264
Power A, Cozzolino D. How fishy is your fish? Authentication, provenance and traceability in fish and seafood by means of vibrational spectroscopy. Appl Sci (Switzerland). 2020;10:1–13.
Molkentin J, Lehmann I, Ostermeyer U, Rehbein H. Traceability of organic fish - authenticating the production origin of salmonids by chemical and isotopic analyses. Food Control. 2015;53:55–66.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.01.003
Gopi K, Mazumder D, Sammut J, Saintilan N. Determining the provenance and authenticity of seafood: a review of current methodologies. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019;91:294–304.
doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.010
El Sheikha AF, Montet D. How to determine the geographical origin of Seafood? Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56(2):306–17.
doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.745478
pubmed: 24834835
Milan M, Maroso F, Dalla Rovere G, Carraro L, Ferraresso S, Patarnello T, et al. Tracing seafood at high spatial resolution using NGS-generated data and machine learning: comparing microbiome versus SNPs. Food Chem. 2019;286:413–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.037
pubmed: 30827626
El Sheikha 151AF, Xu J. Traceability as a Key of Seafood Safety: reassessment and possible applications. Reviews Fisheries Sci Aquaculture. 2017;25:158–70.
doi: 10.1080/23308249.2016.1254158
Pimentel T, Marcelino J, Ricardo F, Soares AMVM, Calado R. Bacterial communities 16S rDNA fingerprinting as a potential tracing tool for cultured seabass Dicentrarchus labrax. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11862.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11552-y
pubmed: 28928412
pmcid: 5605529
Le Nguyen DD, Ngoc HH, Dijoux D, Loiseau G, Montet D. Determination of fish origin by using 16S rDNA fingerprinting of bacterial communities by PCR-DGGE: an application on Pangasius fish from Viet Nam. Food Control. 2008;19:454–60.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.05.006
Donkersley P, Rhodes G, Pickup RW, Jones KC, Wilson K. Bacterial communities associated with honeybee food stores are correlated with land use. Ecol Evol. 2018;8:4743–56.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.3999
pubmed: 29876054
pmcid: 5980251
Soliman T, Yang SY, Yamazaki T, Jenke-Kodama H. Profiling soil microbial communities with next-generation sequencing: the influence of DNA kit selection and technician technical expertise. PeerJ. 2017;5, e4178.
Shehata HR, Mitterboeck TF, Hanner R. Characterization of the microbiota of commercially traded finfish fillets. Food Res Int. 2020;137:109373.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109373
pubmed: 33233075
Vatsos IN. Standardizing the microbiota of fish used in research. Lab Anim. 2017;514:353–64.
doi: 10.1177/0023677216678825
Pratte ZA, Besson M, Hollman RD, Stewart FJ. The gills of reef fish support a distinct Microbiome influenced by host-specific factors. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(9):e00063–18.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00063-18
pubmed: 29453266
pmcid: 5930318
Quero GM, Piredda R, Basili M, Maricchiolo G, Mirto S, Manini E, et al. Host-associated and environmental microbiomes in an Open-Sea Mediterranean Gilthead Sea Bream Fish Farm. Microb Ecol. 2023;86(2):1319–30.
doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-02120-7
pubmed: 36205738
Itay P, Shemesh E, Ofek-Lalzar M, Davidovich N, Kroin Y, Zrihan S, Stern N, et al. An insight into gill microbiome of Eastern Mediterranean wild fish by applying next generation sequencing. Front Mar Sci. 2022;9:1008103.
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.1008103
Clinton M, Wyness AJ, Martin SAM, Brierley AS, Ferrier DEK. Sampling the fish gill microbiome: a comparison of tissue biopsies and swabs. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):1–15.
doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02374-0
del Rio-Lavín A, Monchy S, Jiménez E, Pardo MÁ. Gut microbiota fingerprinting as a potential tool for tracing the geographical origin of farmed mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis). PLoS ONE. 2023;18(8), e0290776.
Donnelly KAM, Olsen P. Catch to landing traceability and the effects of implementation - a case study from the Norwegian white fish sector. Food Control. 2012;27(1):228–33.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.03.021
Gadoin E, Desnues C, Bouvier T, Roque d’Orbcastel E, Auguet JC, Crochemore S, et al. Tracking spoilage bacteria in the tuna microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2022;98(10):fiac110.
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiac110
pubmed: 36124730
Liu X, Teixeira JS, Ner S, Ma KV, Petronella N, Banerjee S, Ronholm J. Exploring the potential of the microbiome as a marker of the geographic origin of fresh seafood. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:696.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00696
pubmed: 32362885
pmcid: 7181054
FAO G. The state of Mediterranean and Black Sea fisheries. Rome: FAO; 2016.
Cini A, Meriggi N, Bacci G, Cappa F, Vitali F, Cavalieri D, Cervo R. Gut microbial composition in different castes and developmental stages of the invasive hornet Vespa Velutina Nigrithorax. Sci Total Environ. 2020;745:140873.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140873
pubmed: 32758760
Takahashi S, Tomita J, Nishioka K, Hisada T, Nishijima M. Development of a prokaryotic universal primer for simultaneous analysis of Bacteria and Archaea using next-generation sequencing. PLoS ONE 2014; 9(8), e105592.
Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17(1):10–2.
doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–3.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869
pubmed: 27214047
pmcid: 4927377
Wright ES. Using decipher v2. 0 to analyze big biological sequence data in r. R J. 2016; 8(1).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2017.
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D et al. Vegan: community ecology package. 2019.
Kandlikar GS, Gold ZJ, Cowen MC, Meyer RS, Freise AC, Kraft NJB et al. Ranacapa: an R package and Shiny web app to explore environmental DNA data with exploratory statistics and interactive visualizations. F1000Research. 2018; 7.
Lahti L, Shetty S. microbiome R package. http://microbiome.github.io .
Arbizu PM. pairwiseAdonis: pairwise multilevel comparison using adonis. 2017. R package version 00, 2019; 1.
McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4), e61217.
Kassambara A, rstatix. Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. R package version 0.6.0; 2020.
Shade A, Stopnisek N. Abundance-occupancy distributions to prioritize plant core microbiome membership. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019;49:50–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2019.09.008
pubmed: 31715441
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of Fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with deseq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
pubmed: 25516281
pmcid: 4302049
Shetty SA, Lahti L. Microbiomeutilities: an R package for utilities to guide in-depth marker gene amplicon data analysis (Version 0.99.00). Zenodo. 2018.
Hamilton NE, Ferry M. Ggtern: Ternary diagrams using ggplot2. J Stat Softw. 2018;87:1–17.
doi: 10.18637/jss.v087.c03
Wickham H, Chang W, Wickham MH. Package ‘ggplot2’. Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using Gramm Graphics Version. 2016;2(1):1–189.