Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a U.S. FDA pooled analysis.


Journal

Journal of the National Cancer Institute
ISSN: 1460-2105
Titre abrégé: J Natl Cancer Inst
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7503089

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 21 12 2023
revised: 12 02 2024
accepted: 04 03 2024
medline: 15 3 2024
pubmed: 15 3 2024
entrez: 15 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This pooled analysis of patient-level data from trials evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with or without cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) prior to a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and anti-angiogenic therapy. Five trials of ICI plus anti-angiogenic therapy were pooled. Only patients with stage 4 at initial diagnosis were included to ensure that nephrectomy was done for cytoreductive purposes and not to previously treat an earlier stage of disease. Effect of CN prior to ICI on outcomes was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards regression model, adjusted for age, sex, risk group, performance status, and presence of sarcomatoid differentiation. A total of 981 patients were included. The estimated median progression-free survival with and without nephrectomy was 15 and 11 months, respectively, and the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.85). The estimated median overall survival with and without nephrectomy was 46 and 28 months, respectively, and the adjusted HR was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51 to 0.77). Objective response was 60% of patients with vs 46% of patients without CN. Patients with mRCC with CN prior to ICI plus anti-angiogenic therapy had improved outcomes compared to patients without CN. Selection factors for CN may be prognostic and could not be fully controlled for in this retrospective analysis. Prospective determination of and stratification by prior CN may be considered when designing clinical trials to assess impact of this factor on prognosis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This pooled analysis of patient-level data from trials evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with or without cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) prior to a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and anti-angiogenic therapy.
METHODS METHODS
Five trials of ICI plus anti-angiogenic therapy were pooled. Only patients with stage 4 at initial diagnosis were included to ensure that nephrectomy was done for cytoreductive purposes and not to previously treat an earlier stage of disease. Effect of CN prior to ICI on outcomes was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards regression model, adjusted for age, sex, risk group, performance status, and presence of sarcomatoid differentiation.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 981 patients were included. The estimated median progression-free survival with and without nephrectomy was 15 and 11 months, respectively, and the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.85). The estimated median overall survival with and without nephrectomy was 46 and 28 months, respectively, and the adjusted HR was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51 to 0.77). Objective response was 60% of patients with vs 46% of patients without CN.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Patients with mRCC with CN prior to ICI plus anti-angiogenic therapy had improved outcomes compared to patients without CN. Selection factors for CN may be prognostic and could not be fully controlled for in this retrospective analysis. Prospective determination of and stratification by prior CN may be considered when designing clinical trials to assess impact of this factor on prognosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38486364
pii: 7629168
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae066
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Published by Oxford University Press 2024.

Auteurs

Jaleh Fallah (J)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Haley Gittleman (H)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Chana Weinstock (C)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Elaine Chang (E)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Sundeep Agrawal (S)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Shenghui Tang (S)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Richard Pazdur (R)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Paul G Kluetz (PG)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Daniel L Suzman (DL)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Laleh Amiri-Kordestani (L)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

Classifications MeSH