A novel neck brace to characterize neck mobility impairments following neck dissection in head and neck cancer patients.

neck dissection range of motion measurements wearable neck brace

Journal

Wearable technologies
ISSN: 2631-7176
Titre abrégé: Wearable Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918230402406676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 13 11 2020
revised: 11 05 2021
accepted: 01 06 2021
medline: 12 7 2021
pubmed: 12 7 2021
entrez: 15 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This article introduces a dynamic neck brace to measure the full range of motion (RoM) of the head-neck. This easy-to-wear brace was used, along with surface electromyography (EMG), to study changes in movement characteristics after neck dissection (ND) in a clinical setting. The brace was inspired by the head-neck anatomy and was designed based on the head-neck movement of 10 healthy individuals. A 6 degrees-of-freedom open-chain structure was adopted to allow full RoM of the head-neck with respect to the shoulders. The physical model was realized by 3D printed materials and inexpensive sensors. Five subjects, who underwent unilateral selective ND, were assessed preoperative and postoperative using this prototype during the head-neck motions. Concurrent EMG measurements of their sternocleidomastoid, splenius capitis, and trapezius muscles were made. Reduced RoM during lateral bending on both sides of the neck was observed after surgery, with a mean angle change of 8.03° on the dissected side (95% confidence intervals [CI], 3.11-12.94) and 9.29° on the nondissected side (95% CI, 4.88-13.69), where CI denotes the confidence interval. Axial rotation showed a reduction in the RoM by 5.37° (95% CI, 2.34-8.39) on the nondissection side. Neck extension showed a slight increase in the RoM by 3.15° (95% CI, 0.81-5.49) postoperatively. This brace may serve as a simple but useful tool in the clinic to document head-neck RoM changes in patients undergoing ND. Such a characterization may help clinicians evaluate the surgical procedure and guide the recovery of patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38486630
doi: 10.1017/wtc.2021.8
pii: S2631717621000086
pmc: PMC10936248
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e8

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Biing-Chwen Chang (BC)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Haohan Zhang (H)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Sallie Long (S)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Adetokunbo Obayemi (A)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Scott H Troob (SH)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
New York Presbyterian-Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Sunil K Agrawal (SK)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Rehabilitative and Regenerative Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Classifications MeSH